• On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
October 15, 2007 1:36 PM PDT

Secret manual shows Comcast (gasp!) protects customers' privacy

by Declan McCullagh
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments
Share
Technorati Profile

Comcast's confidential "Law Enforcement Handbook" was publicly disclosed on Monday.

It turns out to be a 35-page manual dated September 2007 for police and intelligence agencies to use when they're trying to extract information out of Comcast about subscribers. The company's Internet service, VoIP telephone service and cable TV service are all covered.

Among the highlights:
• Comcast maintains for 180 days a log of what IP addresses its users are assigned.
• Unread e-mail is deleted after 45 days and sent mail after 30 days.
• Comcast does not automatically keep copies of e-mail downloaded through POP (Post Office Protocol) to a program like Thunderbird.
• Requests made under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act are handled through FBI field offices in Philadelphia and Trenton, N.J., which will send an agent to "hand deliver" the documents.
• Court-ordered wiretaps cost police $1,000 for a set-up fee and "$750.00 per month for each subsequent month in which the original order or any extensions of the original order are active." Also, Comcast will, for $150 a week when legally obliged to do so, divulge lists of calls made and received.

What's perhaps most interesting, though, is that the leaked handbook shows that Comcast seems to be trying to protect its customers' privacy. I didn't see anything in the document offering to divulge more information than the law permits. Instead, the company repeatedly stresses that police follow legal requirements, and even attaches the text of two federal privacy laws as appendixes.

Of course, those laws may be overly fed-friendly, especially when it comes to FISA requests, orders requiring companies not to delete records and national security letters. Blame federal police and a compliant Congress for that.

Comcast representative Sena Fitzmaurice confirmed on Monday that the handbook was legitimate. It was posted by the Federation of American Scientists' Secrecy News.

It's worth noting that, in a survey CNET News.com conducted last year of Internet service providers, Comcast said "no" when asked: "Have you turned over information or opened up your networks to the National Security Agency without being compelled by law?"

Others, including AT&T, Cable & Wireless and Global Crossing, refused to answer the question.

Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan.
advertisement
Recent posts from Politics and Law
'Green' gas and diesel get boost in biofuel grants
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
eBay fined $2.5 million in French perfume case
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Spain mandates affordable broadband for all
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Comcast?
by nicmart October 15, 2007 3:11 PM PDT
Hard to believe, but it seems like time to say something good
about Comcast. It appears to be a responsible policy. Unlike the
creeps at AT&T, who appear to make their company little more
than an agent of the executive branch.
Reply to this comment
It's actually much better than the article suggests.
by dubyahdee October 15, 2007 4:06 PM PDT
Agents don't really know where the office for hand delivery is, and no one at Comcast knows for sure either. When agents finally show up for "hand delivery" requests, they wait in line for an hour to find out Comcast just gave the last of those documents to some guy a few minutes ago. They then promise to mail the documents, but never do. When the Fed calls back, they say that mailing the documents is against policy, but they can come pick it up.

And the email retention policy doesn't matter because they store the emails on a Motorola PVR. It crashes every week or so and they lose all the data.
Reply to this comment
Would appreciate knowing how you know this
by Brentbb0 October 15, 2007 5:12 PM PDT
It would be nice to believe you. Can you increase our confidence in what you say?
View reply
For safety some privacy must be sacrificed
by jscott418 October 15, 2007 4:50 PM PDT
I personally am not paranoid about this. I am certain that a lot of
information is already out there and its a little late to worry about it
now.
Reply to this comment
Essential Liberty and Temporary Safety
by ben_franklin October 15, 2007 5:22 PM PDT
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

---

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
Fine...
by devbost October 17, 2007 6:35 AM PDT
...you move to China where you can be really, really safe, and the rest of us who don't buy that argument will continue trying to wrest privacy rights from an authoritarian government run amok.
Coward!!!
by VelvetJonesLives October 15, 2007 5:09 PM PDT
You sniveling coward. You don't deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Reply to this comment
who/what
by this1! October 16, 2007 12:26 AM PDT
are you talking to/about Velvet?

as much as i <3 yelling lunatics who believe their views are right just because they can say them louder, it would be nice for said views to be expressed in a manner so that others beside the yelling lunatic knows what said lunatic is talking about.
now let's see the real one
by sadchild October 16, 2007 6:07 AM PDT
now let's see the real one, not the one they printed and leaked to the media
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right