Laptop border searches to continue
When the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced last summer that it could seize anyone's laptop, mobile phone, or camera at the border to analyze them for an indefinite period, the criticism was immediate.
Sen. Russ Feingold, a Democrat, called the move "alarming," and the ACLU denounced it as "surrendering your Fourth Amendment rights at the border."
It didn't help that the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals already had blessed the practice--meaning that anyone, even U.S. citizens, can have their tangle of gadgetry seized at borders or at international arrivals even if there's zero evidence of illicit activities. (It won't happen to everyone in practice, of course, but DHS nevertheless reserved the right to do it.)
On Thursday, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced new guidelines for searching and seizing electronic devices at the border. In a press release, DHS said the guidelines will "enhance and clarify oversight for searches of computers and other electronic media at U.S. ports of entry."
Rhetoric aside, in reality, not much has changed. Laptops and electronic gear can still be seized and held indefinitely; there's no requirement that they be returned to their owners after even six months or a year has passed, though supervisory approval is required if they're held for more than 15 days. The complete contents of a hard drive or memory card can be perused at length for evidence of lawbreaking of any kind, even if it's underpaying your taxes or not paying parking tickets.
This kind of open-ended scanning should worry anyone who travels internationally, not just privacy advocates. When we have laws like the No Electronic Theft Act, which makes sharing a sufficient number of MP3 files a federal crime, how many college students are unindicted felons? File this under the show-me-the-man-and-I'll-show-you-the-crime department.
Harvey Silverglate, a criminal defense attorney in Boston and co-founder of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, has a forthcoming book on this point called Three Felonies A Day. "When a statute is so broad that it catches so much ordinary activity, it's very problematic," Silverglate told me in an interview for CBSNews.com this week.
Here's an excerpt from the Homeland Security directive (PDF) to U.S. Customs and Border Protection: "An Officer may detain electronic devices, or copies of information contained therein, for a brief, reasonable period of time to perform a thorough border search. The search may take place on-site or at an off-site location, and is to be completed as expeditiously as possible."
Once the examination is complete and you have not been deemed a criminal, according to Homeland Security's privacy impact assessment (PDF): "CBP will contact you by telephone when the examination of the electronic device(s) is complete, to notify you that you may pick-up the item(s) during regular business hours from the location where the item(s) was detained. If it is impractical for you to pick up the device, CBP can make arrangements to ship the device to you at our expense." (Who's responsible if it's damaged in transit is anyone's guess.)
Homeland Security said Thursday that it performed approximately 1,000 laptop searches from October 1, 2008, through August 11, 2009.
One way to protect yourself from these searches is to use whole disk encryption from a company like PGP and make sure your laptop is completely powered down when crossing the border.
It's true that under the Obama administration, Homeland Security is trying to discourage agents from adding copies of your digital photos or other private files to their personal collections, and it has warned that trade secrets, journalists' notes, and medical records should be handled carefully. These are improvements over the Bush administration's policy.
But a better rule might be a simple one: require some evidence of wrongdoing--at least some suspicion of illegal activity--before agents start to poke through your PC and assorted gadgetry. This is what a bill introduced last year by Feingold would have done. The problem the Wisconsin senator wanted to address still exists; let's hope his desire to fix it does as well.
Declan McCullagh is a contributor to CNET News and a correspondent for CBSNews.com who has covered the intersection of politics and technology for over a decade. Declan writes a regular feature called Taking Liberties, focused on individual and economic rights; you can bookmark his CBS News Taking Liberties site, or subscribe to the RSS feed. You can e-mail Declan at declan@cbsnews.com. 
Once our gubmint gets their claws into something, especially in the law enforcement area, it takes some serious shouting and shoving to get it back. It doesn't really matter to them if it's right or wrong.
The harder part is avoiding the USA even for transit, because unlike European airports there is no such thing like separating transit passengers from real-inbound passengers, you have to fill in the same boring forms and risk the same laptop theft.
If everybody just stops visiting the USA this practice will soon stop by economic preasure from within, and the USA once again becomes a civilized country with better human rights than the rights they are defending in other counties with oil.
Thanks,.
Why would you search the border of a laptop? What good would that do? Shouldn't you search the hard drive of a laptop?
How about Border Searches of Laptops to Continue.
I'm glad Janet got to be DHS director--it got her out of my state as governor. But I wish she would borrow a little intelligence from somebody!
We are not alone in this search authority. I have been to 39 foreign countries in my life and every one of them have the same authority to search. So climb down form the US bashig crap. The sole reason for the article seems to be to raise anti-government feces slinging.
Travelling from one nation to another is real tricky. Here we have signs OUR government has posted along the highways leading to Mexico telling travellers that Mexico does not allow the importation of weapons or ammunition. (The southbound gun-runners don't care about that rule - they still smuggle the guns across through the desert not the regular ports.) Unless you ask before you travel, Mexico doesn't tell you what you can't bring into their country, But they'll arrest you if you do. And, once you cross the border you have brought it in. (and "I didn't know that was illegal." doesn't cut it.) One bullet will get you into the pokey over there.
One curious fact missing from the article is how many items they have actually seized as compared to how many are actually brought through the checkpoints.
Having crossed the border hundreds of times I know how many of the border agents think and that leads me to believe that they focus more on the contents of things brought in by foreign nationals and commercial shippers than everyday US Citizens. So, travel light, travel smart, and enjoy the trip.
The problem with all these Bush-era regulations, is that once they're in force and things have racheted up, they rarely rachet down. You've lost these rights forever.
You hit the nail on the head with that one. Remember the article about the GAO doing a study of the number of federal laws on the books? I believe they stopped counting at 10,000. What was it O'Brien said in '1984', "we've created so many laws that you'll have broken half a dozen by the time you get out of bed in the morning"?
- by moldor September 18, 2009 4:56 AM PDT
- What about MP3 players ? If I come to the USA with my iPhone full of podcasts and music, will they ask me to PROVE that they are genuinely purchased ? Will I have to bring receipts ?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(27 Comments)I can't see how this can be workable - but then again it IS the US Government, so maybe it doesn't have to be ?