• On MovieTome: R2D2 was in Star Trek?
June 17, 2009 5:46 PM PDT

Iranians find ways to bypass Net censors

by Declan McCullagh
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 15 comments

A new generation of Iranians has found ways to bypass the country's notoriously censorial Internet restrictions and disseminate details about Iran's internal turmoil in the wake of the recent election.

In technical circles, at least, Iran is well-known for erecting one of the world's most restrictive Internet blockades, second only to China in its scope. Certain blogs are cordoned off, politically unacceptable keywords are blocked, and Web sites like Facebook, MySpace, Flickr, the BBC, and YouTube remain--at least at the moment--off-limits.

That has complicated the task of distributing videos and e-mail descriptions of the hundreds of thousands of demonstrators marching in the streets to protest the reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Supporters of reformist leader Mir Hossein Mousavi have alleged that the election was a fraud.

But the government's censors have been unable to staunch every data leak. "The bottom line is that a lot of information is still getting out," says Zahir Janmohamed, advocacy director of the Middle East and North Africa for Amnesty International USA.


Watch CBS Videos Online
Harry Smith of CBS News speaks with Steve Grove, director of news video at
YouTube, about the role YouTube is playing in Iran as the country tries to
crack down on news organizations.

Some of the online restrictions appeared around the time of the election: that's when Facebook, BBC English (BBC Persia was already blocked), Technorati.com, and YouTube were added to the verboten-in-Iran list. One report says that YouTube's traffic from Iran has dropped by 90 percent in the last few days, and another says that Yahoo Messenger was blocked early Wednesday. Unconfirmed reports from Iran say Twitter.com is also blocked.

One way around the government's online blockades is to find the electronic equivalent of a detour, which involves using something known as a proxy server.

Here's how it works: Normally, a Web browser makes a connection directly to a Web site's Internet address. But that address can be easily discovered and added to the government's blacklist. The trick is to redirect Web browsing through a proxy, which could be a permanent commercial service or someone volunteering his or her computer temporarily.

Then, instead of the relatively easy task of blocking Facebook.com or YouTube.com, the Iranian government has the far more difficult job--in practice, an impossible one--of identifying and blacklisting thousands of individual proxy servers.

In the last few days, Web sites like proxysetupforiran.blogspot.com have sprouted, as have exhortations to engage in a bit of social activism by creating your own proxy server, complete with detailed instructions on how to do it.

Twitter is abuzz with information on how to set up proxies and tips on how to keep addresses known to correspond to Iranian government computers from using them. Other sites have suggested filter-bypassing utilities like a Firefox plug-in that bypasses bans on connecting to Flickr.com or software called FreeAccess Plus that claims to circumvent restrictions on YouTube, MySpace, and some Persian-language sites blocked by Iran.

Using Tor to stay anonymous
Similarly, Iranian usage of the Tor anonymizing network has spiked. "We have seen a doubling of Tor users from IP addresses in Iran over the last few days," says Andrew Lewman, executive director of The Tor Project.

Think of Tor as a far more complex and powerful version of a proxy server; once a computer with the right software installed connects to the Tor network, the rest of the connection becomes very difficult for even government agencies to monitor. Unlike some Web-based anonymizers or proxy servers, Tor can handle instant messaging communications as well.


Watch CBS Videos Online
Iran has a history of riots and protests. Students rioted in 1999 and 2003, but
were put down quickly. The difference this time is the Internet. Bob Orr reports.

Tor's public addresses can be blocked, of course, but enterprising individuals can set up private entry points. "You act as a secure relay into the Tor network," Lewman says, referring to private entry points. "From someone watching it, it looks like an SSL session between a browser and a web server, so it doesn't stand out. We look like SSL by design, because who's going to suspect a web browser?" (SSL stands for Secure Sockets Layer, the standard method of encrypting Web connections to banks or credit card companies. There have been reports that Iran is blocking SSL too.)

A Web site called iran.whyweprotest.net has recommended Iranians use Tor to cloak their identities and bypass government filters; a related one called TorIR.org offers instructions on how to configure the software for most common Web browsers.

Daniel Calingaert, deputy director of programs at Freedom House, a human rights group, says Iranian authorities have been focused on jamming phones and satellite connections and have not paid as much attention to the Internet.

"They're still focused on cat and mouse games with satellite broadcasting," Calingaert says. "They had jammed BBC Persia, which is probably the most respected and known source of news. And then we've heard that BBC moved to different frequencies. A lot of people are able to get it. It varies based on time of day and neighborhood."

Janmohamed, from Amnesty International USA, says that because SMS text messages are curbed, Iranians have been using the Twitter application on mobile phones as an alternative. And now, he believes, the government has begun to pay attention. "When I look at the pattern of arrests from Saturday to today, initially you had the Mousavi supporters, the Calvin Klein activists--the urban elites--and now you're getting people of all different backgrounds," he says. "They're cracking down on a wider group of people."

According to the OpenNet Initiative, a collaboration of Harvard University, the University of Toronto, the University of Cambridge, and Oxford University, Iran "uses the commercial filtering package SmartFilter--made by the U.S.-based company, Secure Computing--as the primary technical engine of its filtering system."

McAfee now owns Secure Computing and sells the software as McAfee SmartFilter; a product description boasts of "a proven repository of more than 25 million blockable websites across more than 90 categories." (A U.S. economic embargo against Iran prohibits software licensing and the company has said in the past that the software is pirated. McAfee did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday. Harvard law professor Jonathan Zittrain, an OpenNet contributor, wrote in a blog post this week that "today Iran runs its own home-grown filtering software.)

Even if Iranians can't always secure a reliable Internet connection to the outside world, they nevertheless have a potent voice: the Iranian and Persian diaspora, amounting to millions of former residents living abroad. It just takes one e-mail message with a video or photo attached for the contents to rocket around the diaspora and eventually end up on a place like TehranBureau.com. In a pinch, a simple phone call to a family member abroad can be transcribed for a Twitter feed.

Freedom House's Calingaert says: "What makes this situation different from others and is driving a lot of it is that you have a very large and vibrant online and blogger community of Iranians outside the country."

"People are really bypassing channels though Facebook and Twitter and contacting their cousins," Amnesty's Janmohamd adds. "You've got one of the largest Iranian diasporas in Los Angeles. Information is getting out there."

Updated 8:14 p.m. PDT: Added more information on Iran's filters.

Declan McCullagh is a contributor to CNET News and a correspondent for CBSNews.com who has covered the intersection of politics and technology for over a decade. Declan writes a regular feature called Taking Liberties, focused on individual and economic rights; you can bookmark his CBS News Taking Liberties site, or subscribe to the RSS feed. You can e-mail Declan at declan@cbsnews.com.
advertisement
Recent posts from Politics and Law
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
eBay fined $2.5 million in French perfume case
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Spain mandates affordable broadband for all
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
Dot-com thinking for D.C.: Expert Labs debuts
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by man_w_balls June 17, 2009 9:26 PM PDT
it's the Internet vs totalitarian social control!

go Freedom!
Reply to this comment
by Fil0403 June 20, 2009 9:53 AM PDT
Thank God Bush is gone, otherwise people would probably see it as Bush vs. Iran.
by hmdz105 June 17, 2009 10:54 PM PDT
What a paradox!!!
At the same time US has helped Iranian regime by denying Iranian's access to MSN messenger, Google Talk, and all other Google product out there under the pretext of USA sanctions!!!. I think Google And Microsoft both share the same ideas with Ahmadinejad's government! Go criticize US, CNET!
Reply to this comment
by surf&work June 18, 2009 9:06 AM PDT
***? This comment is full of holes.
by tenbosch June 18, 2009 5:56 AM PDT
All this talk of Internet technology. Is there any reason someone from Iran can't just pick up a telephone and make their message heard?
Reply to this comment
by surf&work June 18, 2009 9:18 AM PDT
Quoting from this article you just read: "Iranian authorities have been focused on jamming phones and satellite connections."
by Seaspray0 June 18, 2009 11:08 AM PDT
Declan McCullagh, can you update the article to show any facts on whether the reason for the protests is a valid one... mainly, "that the election was a fraud"? Defending freedom of speech is great as long as the message isn't a lie. I don't doubt there was some fraud, but all the information I've seen to date doesn't indicate it would have affected the outcome of the election by a long shot.
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 June 18, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
The western media is not reporting that Mousavi won the election. They are reporting that Mousavi is declaring the election a fraud - which, is what the losing candidate does after each and every election.

There is no doubt that there is a news story, that mass protests is a news story....at the same time, if we are going to debate the subject, what should a country do, if an opposition pro-western candidate, has a significant, protesting, and mobilized army of support, and yet failed to win the election?

Should we then advocate overturning the election? Should a candidate who didn't win, replace the candidate who did win?

Frankly I don't care about either candidate in Iran, thats their business, but I don't see the automatic relationship between protest and regime change, that others seem to think exists.
Reply to this comment
by NorthwestTech June 18, 2009 2:29 PM PDT
@Seaspray0

The question of whether details of the protesters' message are true is beside the point. The problem is the censorship. And this certainly does play into your concern about the veracity of the info coming out of Iran: When the only information available is that which is sanctioned by the authorities, it is *guaranteed* to be distorted. The only way to learn what is really happening is to provide free communication for all sides.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 June 19, 2009 1:37 PM PDT
"The question of whether details of the protesters' message are true is beside the point." No it's not. The election results were not even close. It would have taken massive fraud to throw an election to that degree and so far the evidence does not show this. Fraud of that magnitude would be easy to detect. Slandering the truth is no excuse for violence and destruction, and inciting a mob based on slander does not make it right. You had it partly right... The only way to learn what is really happening is to allow both sides to communicate, but it must be the truth, only the truth, and nothing but the truth. If one side claims fraud, they need to back it up with evidence and so far there has been none. Show me the proof.
by devans00 June 20, 2009 12:34 AM PDT
I love that the internet has made the concept of Media Blackout obsolete. Also, I love that the internet allows regular people from all countries to interact directly, without the filter of governments or mainstream media.

Funny enough, we have more in common, belief in justice and democracy, than one would have thought.
Reply to this comment
by Fil0403 June 20, 2009 9:57 AM PDT
Yes, we can only imagine what has happened in Iran (and other countries) before Internet is what it is today.
by Fil0403 June 20, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
I guess this Net censors are supposed to be a proof of how democratic Iran is?
Reply to this comment
by Fil0403 June 20, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
*these, sorry
by tamrafi June 21, 2009 1:35 AM PDT
We just fail to realize that all we talking is technology, but it has a human face to it. What we are seeing right now is blatant misuse of technology, and feeding it to the new generation, who can't see beside it. How many people tweet on the 70 people killed yesterday in Iraq. How many people thought the about the consequence of war and source of all these trouble and loss of life. Now, using all these technology and technology obsessed minds, everyone want to see bloodshed in Iran. It serves the purpose of many. Lot of warfare and expenses saved, and nobody can 'directly' blame us. But whatever goes around comes around. And truth always wins.
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right