Obama's tech agenda put on hold
This was originally published on CBSNews.com.
When times are hard, people adjust their priorities--even the president. When an unexpected economic disaster imploded as Barack Obama was entering office, some of his technology agenda was put on hold.
Almost 100 days into his presidency, Obama has yet to advance most of the strong technology policies he promised during the campaign.
Thanks in large part to the economic crisis, Obama has yet to put forward his new cybersecurity strategy, or even fill some important technology-related vacancies. At the same time, the downward-spiraling economy has let him to push forward in other ways that were unexpected as recently as last fall.
In orchestrating the development of a $787 billion stimulus package, the president won congressional approval for significant spending on broadband infrastructure, electric smart-grid technology, and electronic health care records. Still unclear, though, are the ultimate results of that spending, or whether it will translate into more investment by the private sector.
"I think it's a positive sign (the administration is) including technology as a cross-cutting issue in all of their priorities," said Ben Scott, the policy director for the media advocacy group Free Press. "So far, with every opportunity to push technology policy into the mix, they've done so. Some of the standalone tech policy agenda has not been an immediate priority, but it would be unfair to demand that, given the other crises the administration is dealing with."
Some of the most important pieces of the president's technology policy are only beginning to unfold. Less than two weeks ago, Obama appointed Virginia's secretary of technology, Aneesh Chopra, to be his chief technology officer. Chopra is responsible for formulating an open government directive within the next 20 days and will work closely with Obama's chief information officer, Vivek Kundra.
Obama's pick to chair the Federal Communications Commission, Julius Genachowski, has yet to be confirmed, but he is expected to push for more Net neutrality regulation.
All three appointments, Scott said, "reflect a strong commitment to a new kind of technology policy, (and) a commitment to making technology work for the government."
Appointments may hint at approach
Obama has also made some high-level appointments within the Justice Department that may hint at the administration's approach to technology--specifically, toward the protection of intellectual property. The president has filled out the department with lawyers favored by the copyright industry, including attorneys who have represented the Recording Industry Association of America and the Business Software Alliance.
The president has yet to appoint anyone to fill the role of intellectual property enforcement coordinator, a new, congressionally mandated cabinet position responsible for coordinating the White House's IP enforcement efforts. Vice President Joe Biden emphasized the need to find the "right person" for the job, given the significant impact intellectual property has on the economy.
The jury is still out on whether the IP enforcement coordinator will play a meaningful role in copyright and IP policy in the White House, said David Sohn, senior policy counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT).
"What the person in that position is able to achieve and how much prominence they will have is hard to tell," he said.
While the administration has yet to take any significant actions on the IP front, the Justice Department did intervene last month in a file-sharing case in which it sided with the record label plaintiff.
Obama's endorsement of strong but reasonable intellectual property enforcement generally aligns with the Bush administration's position. President Bush's White House endorsed the legislation that created the IP enforcement coordinator position, after it was stripped of its more extreme provisions.
The Obama White House has yet to greatly diverge from the Bush administration on another tech policy item critical to the nation's economy--cybersecurity--but that could change dramatically in the coming weeks.
Bush in 2008 gave the Homeland Security Department jurisdiction over the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative, a new program to coordinate cybersecurity efforts. The program has come under harsh scrutiny, however, and President Obama in February called for a comprehensive, two-month review of all federal cybersecurity efforts. He selected Melissa Hathaway, who worked for the director of national intelligence in the Bush administration, to conduct the review.
The final review was sent to the president for his approval but has yet to be publicly released. Hathaway last week indicated that it may recommend shifting cybersecurity responsibility away from DHS to the White House.
"Signs so far say there will be at least one major difference (from Bush cybersecurity policy) in terms of transparency," said Greg Nojeim, senior counsel for CDT. "The review team's process has so far been transparent, and they've involved stakeholders from industry, Congress, and privacy and advocacy groups. If that carries forth into the execution of the policy, it would be a very good sign and a significant departure from President Bush's approach."
While Obama may be able to learn from Bush's mistakes in the realm of cybersecurity, he also has the fortuitous advantage of having a green light from Congress to invest in new, major initiatives that his predecessor did not.
Doctors and hospitals will have to digitize their patients' medical records under Obama's watch or face eventual penalties under the electronic health record provisions of the stimulus package. The stimulus bill dedicated $19 billion for the digitization of medical records, which Obama has called the "low-hanging fruit" of health care reform.
Challenges to IT adoption ahead
It may be easy in comparison to comprehensive health care reform, but experts say there are dizzying challenges to information technology adoption in the health sector. It is so challenging that it took the current economic crisis to jump-start the process, even though the and called for health IT adoption years ago.
"I think it was a game-changer for (Obama's) entire economic agenda," said Scott, of Free Press.
In the five years Scott has spent advocating for broadband deployment, he said, it has been difficult to envision investments of even around $200 million--much less the $7.2 billion for broadband included in the stimulus.
Back in September 2008, former FCC Chairman Michael Powell said at an FCC forum that it would be unrealistic to entertain "the idea that there's money to get people to dig up streets and put in fiber."
Now, Scott says, it's possible the $7 billion in broadband stimulus funds could be the first of regular annual investments, if the Universal Service Fund is revised to subsidize broadband infrastructure rather than just telephone service.
"The stimulus bill gave the administration an instant opportunity to implement a new theory of broadband policy, which is to begin treating Internet access as a public good, not as a private good," Scott said. "When you put $7 billion in broadband infrastructure, that is a policy which is really unprecedented and positive."
Rob Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, agreed that the stimulus reflects Obama's commitment to advancing the use of technology, whether through the modernization of the health care system or the expansion of broadband. A commitment to technology is likely to be manifest in the president's procurement policies, regulatory changes, and in other areas.
He said it is doubtful, though, the president will be able to promote spending on technology at a significant level ever again.
"While I think the administration has a deep commitment to public investment in these areas, there are going to be so many priorities in other areas that risk crowding them out," Atkinson said. "The stimulus was a one-time opportunity that doesn't come around very often."
Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CBSNews.com focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie. 
I have got my tax break though in the form of 60 something a month. Thanks Obama!!!!!! That pays for my cable bill. That was promised and delivered.
We can pray things will get better, but it will take a lot more than the government dumping billions of our tax dollars into bailouts. Somebody has to pay for all that, including that $60/month in tax breaks. Trying to make businesses pay for it will only lead to more failed businesses and lost jobs. And I'm not looking forward to my kids having to clean up that financial mess in 10 or 15 years.
The economy imploded AFTER Democrats took control of Congress in 2006. The economy boomed under Clinton after Republicans took control of Congress.
You see, all spending originates in Congress. I know you're probably the product of our public education system (also run by Democrats) so have been indoctrinated to think that Presidents control tax policy, spending policy, writing laws, etc.
Now, since economic hardship is always caused by Democrats and we now have Democrats controlling Congress again, you can expect the economic situation to continually get worse over the next three years. But Obama doesn't have to worry, because you will happily blame every screw up his party produces squarely at the feet of Bush. You will be no different than the idiots in Siberia who cried when they learned Stalin died, even though he was the thug who put them there.
The Tech Agenda is delayed- so nothing is getting done on that project. In that case, there is no work for the Technology Czar or whatever the title is this week. Obama should lay off the entire Technology office including the Czar.
It's the fair thing to do.
As to your earlier comment about the public education system being run by Democrats, and thus being a failure, I believe it was your beloved Bush who came up with and passed no child left behind in 2001 which lets failure after failure graduate because they couldnt possibly be held back because they arent ready for the next grade, it must be the teachers fault, so let them through.
Also thank you for pointing out that in 1999 when Clinton was in charge we had a Republican congress which decided to pass the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which allowed financial institutions to act as both investment baks as well as consumer banks, which was previously not allowed. This was the begining of the end, and made it legal for banks to do the things which go us into this mess. So thanks Republican Congress for all your helpful contributions.
I have my problems with Obama, but its far too soon to judge his performance, and call it a failure in any sense. I wouldnt say hes done any worse than Bush, but then again how could you?
- by DJOmega6 April 28, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
- Jesus, people, it's Republicans AND Democrats fault for this mess. No one is without blame. This is a tech website, not a place to push your own political agendas. If you guys want to do that, go to foxnews.com or msnbc.com
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)