Biden promises 'right person' as new U.S. copyright czar
Vice President Joe Biden lauded Hollywood at a gala dinner in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday evening, assailed movie piracy, and promised film executives that the Obama administration would pick "the right person" as its copyright czar.
Just days after four Pirate Bay defendants were found guilty in Sweden, Biden warned of the harms of piracy at a private event organized by the Motion Picture Association of America in the sumptuous, newly renovated Great Hall of the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C.
"It's pure theft, stolen from the artists and quite frankly from the American people as consequence of loss of jobs and as a consequence of loss of income," Biden said, according to a White House pool report.
Biden blasted China, saying its intellectual property laws remain "largely ineffective" and will end up "strangling their own creative juices," and compared it to what he described as India's more effective anti-piracy regime. He singled out Canada, a close U.S. ally, as needing stronger laws; it never signed the treaty that led to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and a proposal to adopt anti-circumvention restrictions was never adopted.
He also addressed President Obama's forthcoming decision about who will be named the intellectual-property enforcement coordinator, better known as the copyright czar. Copyright industry lobbyists sent a letter Monday to the president asking him to pick someone sympathetic to their concerns, while groups that would curb copyright law sent their own letter urging the opposite approach.
We "will find the right person for intellectual property czar," Biden said.
Under a law approved by the U.S. Congress last October, Obama is required to appoint someone to coordinate the administration's IP enforcement efforts and prepare annual reports.
Senators attending the MPAA gala included Richard Durban (D-Illinois); Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.); Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Judd Gregg (R-N.H.); Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota); Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont); Roger Wicker (R-Mississipi); and Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska).
An unspoken reason for the MPAA event--which included a symposium earlier in the day with remarks from top House Democrats and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke--was the loss of $246 million in tax breaks when the Senate revised the economic stimulus bill earlier this year. An MPAA report released Tuesday appears designed to avoid a repeat of that setback, listing the number of movies being filmed in each state.
Earlier in the day, Locke also talked up more government action against peer-to-peer piracy. "The recent revelation that an illegal copy of the upcoming movie "Wolverine" had been posted on the Internet prior to its theatrical release underscores the problem the industry faces...As a former prosecutor, I believe in the full and impartial enforcement of the law," he said.
On copyright, President Obama has signaled a more pro-industry approach than his predecessor, which has alarmed advocates of less restrictive laws.
The president chose as top Justice Department officials the music industry attorney who pulled the plug on Grokster and another longtime Recording Industry Association of America ligitator. The Obama administration recently sided with the RIAA in a file-sharing suit, and Biden was a staunch RIAA and MPAA ally as a U.S. senator.
"I think sometimes you underestimate the impact you have, and not just entertaining but uplifting," Biden told the audience at the MPAA event. "I wish I could inspire the way you do."
Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan. 



What fair use was involved in TPB?
Anyone caught violating these tough new restrictions should be considered enemies of the state, out and out terrorists that threaten the existence of the American Way. We'll turn them into front line targets in the next wars in Somalia and Sudan.
-
Coined "Inclusive" and "Inclusive Democracy" concepts from math term.
Original creator of "Lights On! Tampa!" art display/contest.
Proposed "Floating Riverwalk" for Tampa
Proposed "Water Taxi" for Tampa
Proposed Lee Roy Selmon Expressway 43 bridge extension to St. Pete w/rail link, civilian air port use for Mac Dill Field.
Developed pheromone chewing gum cure for delinquency, criminal behavior, drug addiction and sexual perversion.
Proposed GA's HOPE Scholarship Program (precursor to Bright Futures), college for millions.
Proposed "Don't ask, Don't tell", Law & Rule Obeying Gays in the Military executive order & 1st thing timing
Proposed Tuskeegee Presidential Apologies and generous NIH Victim Restitutions.
Presidential advisor to President Bubba "Bill" Clinton, Hillary Clinton 1972
Presidential advisor to Presidents George W. & G. H. W. Bush, 1971
(George H.W. Bush led the plumbers in killing JFK & many others)
Wrote poems for Dead Poets Society (& sax solo)
lyrics "Light and Day" Spotless Mind
Stories, characters, speeches for Braveheart, Independence Day, Armageddon, Deep Impact, Titanic, Good Will Hunting (I wrote the notes/problems in the film), Cast Away, LOR, Wag the Dog, Lost in Translation, V for Vendetta, Juno, Forrest Gump, Night at the Museum, Shawshank Redeption, The Matrix I, II), Austin Powers, Green Mile, Cast Away, Gladiator, Mystic River, 300, Galaxy Quest, Vanilla Sky, A Beautiful Mind, Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Simpsons Movie, etc.. And TV shows: Morning Edition, Touched by an Angel, Bones, Justice, House, Lost, Numbers, and Fringe (of course).
Found three ways to mitigate hurricanes (saved Houston from Ike flooding), potential treatment for autoimmune disease and cancer. Invented the port doubler for laptops, a room temperature superconductor, artificial gills. All this and nobody cares? Where are my old friends?
but then I read the above comment and my train of thought was derailed!
Elaborate please - ***? Strange ramblings or actual meaningfulness?!?
Other "sampling" examples that are absolutely creative:
- taking a naturally occuring fungus and transforming it into penicillin. A useful sampling, I would think.
- taking a sail from sailing, and a board from surfing, and inventing the windsurfer. Nothing AT ALL new about a windsurfer, but it is a transformative sampling of existing inventions.
Dude, you suggest our artist "come up with some original work". You are myopic, and one of the many who have either been fooled, or are so foolish as to think that invention comes from magic and appears in the inventor's brain as an isolated "spark" of invention. Music, art, movies (according to you) all appear as entirely creative works to a single person, who then should OWN all forms of revenue for that invention. A much more reasonable theory, borne out by...i dunno...reality, suggests that when we invent something "we stand on the shoulders of giants". That means that almost all invention is actually not spark appearing out of the ether, but the flame of a candle that is passed from one artist to another with varying amounts of sampling.
Call it sampling, learing, cultural heritage, copying, combination...if we didn't build on the achievments of prior humans, we would each need to truly start from scratch: spending our full days gathering fruit and pulling lice out of each other's back hair with our handy opposable thumbs.
(PS: Opposable thumbs idea courtesy of Charles Darwin, all rights reserved.)
"Biden blasted China, saying its intellectual property laws remain "largely ineffective" and will end up "strangling their own creative juices,""
Actually overly restrictive IP laws choke off innovation, and the U.S is rapidly moving in that direction.
We've seen it with patent law and have started to patch that. Now we have to learn the same lesson with copyright it seems. Nobody creates in a vacuum and when everything is tied up for more than a century and every use and every derivative requires payment, it just become too expensive for anyone else to do anything.
Thus, only Coke can produce Coke. Let's say I produce a drink, call it Coke, and put it on shelves. Trademark law is designed to protect the shopper from buying my crappy, corn-syrup-laced drink while thinking they are buying Coke.
That kind of protection should last indefinitely. It's not defined as ownership, but as consumer confusion prevention.
When he decided to swap out for all new computer systems and was told how much all new licenses for Office were going to cost we switched to Open Office real quick. REAL QUICK. Like in a couple hours. And it was only a few machines. He could have afforded it. Other businesses afford it, but he's cheap. REAL cheap.
Well, the thing is, home users are cheap. I'm not cheap. I'll buy my own copy of Office any day which I do have all legal and legit, but most home users either pirate or download free software. Even though DRM is crackable I've noticed many home users switching to open source stuff anyway because it's just as good. Well for what they do anyway. Why break the law when you don't have to?
Uncrackable DRM would mean some home users which don't have enough money to buy things like Office or a copy of 7, even if they wanted to, wouldn't have a choice anymore. They couldn't choose to download a cracked copy because there wouldn't be one.
That means when they lose their Windows disk instead of downloading a cracked copy of XP they download a copy of Linux. Instead of downloading a cracked copy of Office they download OO. Instead of getting a cracked copy of Photoshop they'll download something else like GIMP or Paint.NET. Alright, so maybe you can afford it, just not your friends right? Well after a few years, if all your friends are using OO and GIMP and FF and you're exchanging data with them, what are you going to download to make it easier on you? The open source programs of course. Why pay all this money for Office when all your broke butt friends are sending you ODFs from their Linux machines anyway right?
Sure, maybe those programs aren't as good, but most users don't really know how to use all the features in those programs anyway. But it doesn't really matter because they'll have no choice anymore. They'll have to suck it up and use open source if they like it or not.
A few decades go by and open source gets more popular by the day. Eventually schools and businesses realize that hey, we're paying for this Windows crap and this Office crap and nobody even knows how to use it! Everyone at home is using Linux and OO and the GIMP. Since that's what they already know how to use and since it's free, why don't we just go ahead and use it too!
That's why MS and Adobe will never make uncrackable DRM. As for music and movies. Well, if I can see it I can record it. If I can hear it I can record it. Good luck trying to make uncrackable DRM for that. You have to unencrypt it eventually. My brain doesn't understand stuff when it's still encoded in AACS. You gotta take the DRM off so I can watch it.
But, if they could make DRM uncrackable on music and movies? That would be fantastic. Kids will never be able to buy and watch as much media as they're stealing now! That means kids seeing less violence in movies. They see less sex in movies because they see less movies. Hearing less violent and sexual rap lyrics. Not being able to hear Britney Spears? How is that a problem? Uncrackable DRM would be the savior of our society! And maybe, just maybe, THE KIDS MIGHT ACTUALLY GO OUTSIDE AND PLAY FOR A CHANGE! Nobody would have to see Hollywood's crap propaganda anymore. Locked up tight in uncrackable DRM is exactly where all that crap belongs!
And this copyright crap is what our leaders spend their time on ????
[CNET editor's note: Obscene language deleted.]
Our elected officials aren't representing the people any more, just the corporations that can afford to pay their way into office. I think in terms of politics and the economy, copyright infringement is slightly above gay marriage, and slightly below "less filling vs. less taste" in overall importance.
Democrats warn us of Republican big brother. But Democratic big brother targets little guy who makes a mistake . Not large operation such as http://www.divxcrawler.com/ . We as Customers need a fair use clause for media we buy at Current Price of this media some type of rights should be included . Media Companies need better understanding of Current Technology and have better outlets for there media . Bar code Faking for CD and DVD been around for years RIAA should spend a little time on the Docks or at Dollar store Warehouse distribution centers Checking media . All problems world faces making another million for the EMI or Dream Works Seems Little Self Centered.
Which means the movie was leaked by someone WHO WORKS WITHIN THE MOVIE INDUSTRY or WAS STOLEN FROM THE STUDIO DURING POST PRODUCTION! That has absolutely NOTHING to do with retail consumer piracy or DRM. If it had been a book, would you blame the plain paper copier manufacturers? Of course not, but only because the courts have established plain paper copiers have substantial non-infringing uses. But, there was a time in the '70s when that was very much in question.
Remember, these are the same people that a decade ago thought they should be paid for each temporary copy of a copyrighted work as it traversed the computers comprising the Internet while in transit from point A to point B.
Rock On Piratebay!!!
- by scottthesculptor April 22, 2009 10:29 AM PDT
- copyright law needs some serious revision
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (48 Comments)long dead artists have the copyright for their works handed down through generations or bought by people too rich to bother creating anything but wealth for themselves.
That's what a "Copyright Czar" should be concerned with.
Not some trivial file sharing of mindless entertainment.
But, of course, whoever has the money buys the laws . . .