• On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
March 12, 2009 12:04 PM PDT

Microsoft exec appointed to DHS post

by Stephanie Condon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced Wednesday she is naming a Microsoft executive to be in charge of protecting the U.S. government's computing systems.

Napolitano has appointed Philip Reitinger to be deputy undersecretary for the department's National Protection and Programs Directorate, where he will be responsible for protecting federal computing systems from domestic and foreign threats. Reitinger currently serves as Chief Trustworthy Infrastructure Strategist at Microsoft.

"Phil's background in cybersecurity and computer crime coupled with his experience working across the federal government and the private sector to develop innovative security strategies makes him an asset to our department," Napolitano said in a statement.

In his role at Microsoft, where he is responsible for protecting information technology infrastructure, Reitinger has worked closely with government agencies and other private partners on cybersecurity protection programs.

Reitinger also has experience in the public sector. He formerly served as the executive director of the Defense Department's Cyber Crime Center, which provides electronic forensic services and supports cyberinvestigations. Before that, he was deputy chief of the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property division at the Justice Department. Reitinger also sits on the Federal Emergency Management Agency National Advisory Council, which advises the FEMA administrator on cybersecurity.

Reitinger's appointment comes a week after Rod Beckstrom, director of the DHS National Cybersecurity Center, resigned because of what he perceives as attempts by the National Security Agency to control DHS cyberefforts. The National Cybersecurity Center falls under the jurisdiction of the National Protection and Programs Directorate, so Reitinger will be responsible for replacing Beckstrom, according to DHS spokesperson Amy Kudwa.

Another Microsoft executive with government experience, Microsoft Vice President Scott Charney, echoed Beckstrom's comments on Tuesday telling Congress that the cybersecurity mission does not belong in the hands of the NSA.

"It's really important to empower DHS to take the necessary operational role," he said.

Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CNET News focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Politics and Law
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Spain mandates affordable broadband for all
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
Dot-com thinking for D.C.: Expert Labs debuts
FCC discusses barriers to national broadband plan
What Intel just bought for $1.25 billion: Less risk
by totocalimero March 12, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
Let me guess... He will make sure that the government buys MS stuff and only MS stuff for the next 15 years.

How is it called when the government and big corps are in bed and execs in the private sector "serve" in the government for a few years and then go back to their private employer afterward?

So, how will the license fees be negotiated? Will we see a situation where a former MS exec is in charge of negotiating with current MS execs? Wow! I'm sure the taxpayers will get their money's worth on this one.
Reply to this comment
by kojacked March 12, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
You make a fair point but:
1. Microsoft isn't big on the whole cyber security scene so I doubt there's much he can bring with him.
2. The post isn't CIO, he working for the National Protection and Programs Directorate. I doubt he'll have any say on what productivity apps the goverment uses.
3. How can you bring in an "expert" if they've never worked in the industry? Just because the guy works for Microsoft doesn't make him inherently evil.
by trueBuuuuuut March 12, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
i wont argue about govt. and big corps.

but the US Gov ALREADY does buy almost exclusively MS. there are a few linux/unix boxes here and there where they're absolutely needed, but other than that its windows all around.
by Commander_Spock March 12, 2009 6:30 PM PDT
Re: {... but the US Gov ALREADY does buy almost exclusively MS. there are a few linux/unix boxes here and there where they're absolutely needed, but other than that its windows all around....]"

Did you really mean "other than that its windows (Code-Base OS/2) all around...."; and, after all, with the Russians relying on OS/2 "From (IBM) With Love" there will most naturally be the "SAMBA" Protocol Officials to smooth running of things. Too bad for the Tuxedo Clad Birds (Linux Officials) who did not quite apparently make the cut!
by Commander_Spock March 12, 2009 6:52 PM PDT
This should have read: "there will most naturally be the "SAMBA" Protocol Officials for the smooth running of things".
by n3td3v March 12, 2009 12:37 PM PDT
The irony of putting a Microsoft executive incharge of security.
Reply to this comment
by ducttape36 March 12, 2009 1:35 PM PDT
well, maybe its a good thing, i mean nobody has more experience with exploits than microsoft. i mean, its not like he'll be personally developing the software they use.
by Commander_Spock March 12, 2009 8:56 PM PDT
Re: "maybe its a good thing, i mean nobody has more experience with exploits than Microsoft..."

You forgot to mention that they are famous warriors too they won the Operating System war against IBM and Browser war against Netscape Communications

So, bring the exploits on to the "Code-Base OS/2" Champs!
by edtechlab March 12, 2009 12:44 PM PDT
Microsoft and Security hmmmmmmmmmmm
Reply to this comment
by Super2online March 12, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
As soon as I saw the jist of this article I knew the criticism was seconds from following. Folks, we have far bigger issues to worry about than a Microsoft Executive being put in charge of cyber security.
Reply to this comment
by diver-1 March 12, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
I imagine security updates for every goverment computer every week.
Reply to this comment
by catch23 March 12, 2009 1:18 PM PDT
Doesn't matter, really. The Government (and the military, for that matter) often don't bother to patch them anyway.
by Commander_Spock March 12, 2009 6:49 PM PDT
Re: "I imagine security updates for every government computer every week".

Well, you have to remember that the "Code-Base OS/2 Operating System with 89% plus internet connection then it is: "Jobs-Baby-Jobs" for Software Developers!
by Commander_Spock March 12, 2009 7:09 PM PDT
Why should you worry about your "security" when the Space Dwellers" on the OS/2 controlled International Space Station had to scramble to the standby Russian Space Capsule; and, in any case the "banks" that have all you "cash" (unless you have it in your mattress or you have it buried in your backyard) overwhelmingly run Microsoft's Windows (Code-Base OS/2) Operating Systems and other products.
by tm_anon March 12, 2009 10:18 PM PDT
Actually, I'd think the security updates would come on Cybersecurity Wednesday, just after Patch Tuesday and Bowel movement Monday.
by Commander_Spock March 13, 2009 4:03 AM PDT
Re: "Actually, I'd think the security updates would come on Cybersecurity Wednesday"

Well, you have still got Thursday; and, the next day the 89% Internet Connection Crowd would be singing "Thank God It's Friday"; so, should care if there is the introduction of Double Cybersecurity Saturday and Triple Cubersecurity Sunday when it will be time to go "Fishing" or "Golfing" depending on the interest with time to watch the Russians at play with OS/2 from IBM with from your veranda; otherwise, life after all could have been so dull for some - Huh!
by Commander_Spock March 13, 2009 4:07 AM PDT
Oops! This should have read: "so, (who) should care..." Thanks.
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right