• On BNET: Vote: How will Apple blow it?
March 3, 2009 11:35 AM PST

Obama picks Net neutrality backer as FCC chief

by Declan McCullagh

President Obama on Tuesday nominated Julius Genachowski as the nation's top telecommunications regulator, picking a campaign advisor who has divided his career between Washington, D.C., political jobs and working as an Internet executive.

Genachowski had been mentioned as a likely candidate for the Federal Communications Commission post, in part because he participated in the Obama campaign's Internet efforts and previously worked as chief counsel to Democratic FCC Chairman Reed Hundt.

Julius Genachowski

Julius Genachowski

(Credit: LaunchBox Digital)

"He will bring to the job diverse and unparalleled experience in communications and technology, with two decades of accomplishment in the private sector and public service," Obama said in a statement.

Genachowski is likely to continue the Democratic push for more Net neutrality regulations, which are opposed by some conservatives and telecommunications providers. He was a top Obama technology advisor and aided in crafting a technology platform that supported Net neutrality rules.

The FCC's first official Net neutrality ruling--an earlier one resulted in a settlement--came last summer when the agency narrowly voted by a 3-2 margin that Comcast's throttling of BitTorrent was unlawful. That case is now before a federal appeals court.

Genachowski was a Harvard classmate of Obama's and previously worked for Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer. He's currently a co-founder of LaunchBox Digital and Rock Creek Ventures, and held executive posts including general counsel at IAC/InterActiveCorp, which owns a list of Web properties including Ask.com, Match.com, Gifts.com, Reference.com, Evite, Citysearch, and Excite.

IAC is a member of a coalition that supports more Net neutrality regulations and which also includes Amazon, eBay, and Google.

Genachowski doesn't take over the post officially until his nomination is confirmed, as expected, by the Senate.

Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Politics and Law
Going rogue? Palin bans gadgets, reporters from speech
Europe getting 'Internet freedom' law
Fiorina's first act as senator: Merge California and Nevada
Congress may require ISPs to block fraud sites
New York antitrust suit accuses Intel of bribery
Report: Oracle not yielding to EU with Sun buy
Spring Design seeks injunction barring Nook sales
Barnes & Noble hit with suit over Nook
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Randomletters1 March 3, 2009 12:22 PM PST
+1 to the Obama camp for this move. Keep the throttle wide open on my torrents, and I'll vote you a second term, even though I didn't vote for you the first time.
Reply to this comment
by LastLion March 3, 2009 2:23 PM PST
Ugh. The phrase "net neutrality" conveys a positive message, but it is a complete misnomer. The reason the internet has been so amazing so far is because it has been widely unregulated. You think your torrents are going to better protected when the government controls the web?

The best (simple) explanation I've seen of the farce that is "net neutrality" can be found here:
http://www.dontregulate.org/
Reply to this comment
by atici March 3, 2009 2:54 PM PST
Totally agree. The reason net works so well is because it's mostly unregulated. In fact how well it works demonstrates how great things would be if there were no politicians doing nothing but cr8p and people don't interfere with what individuduals can do. I believe such a country could be possible with a constitution with strongest protections on individual and economic freedoms.
by ogvor March 3, 2009 8:10 PM PST
Yes, it would be much better if Comcast/Verison/Cox/SBC controls the web.
by Dalkorian March 4, 2009 9:11 AM PST
Interesting. Not regulating the net has worked wonderfully so far due to actual competition and the fact that there wasn't all that much going on. High definition video sites didn't exist a few years ago, most if not all web pages were simple static HTML and we were all on local dial up connections. Since those days everything has changed - the internet has more data on it than ever before and most of the content is now dynamic (think of Youtube). Add to that the collusion of the cable and telco companies, who took our money to expand their infrastructure but gave themselves huge cash bonuses instead and are now crying about "Bittorrent pirates" while they start capping the usage we've paid for, and it's plain to see. We have a problem that we can't continue to ignore.

That's what is interesting. To maintain a hands off approach to the internet, we need to create some laws keeping the cable and telcos hands off the internet too. The unregulated internet worked great while it was unregulated by anyone, but once conjob decided to forge packets to illegally terminate a lawful application and instill caps on our usage in order to expand their profits a little more the internet no longer was unregulated. It's just regulated by the cable companies and telcos now.

Do you like the idea of being forced to use the search engine that conjob wants you to use? What if you tried to do a Google search, but found that the site was so slow it wouldn't load because your ISP didn't like them ("they didn't upgrade to the higher bandwidth tier that guaranteed fast packet delivery, like Ask did"). THAT is what you're advocating here.
by Randroid1138 March 3, 2009 11:46 PM PST
The post by "LastLion" below points to a website called http://www.dontregulate.org/

This is what is called "astroturfing", or fake activism by corporations, to fool the general public.

Hands Off The Internet (HOTI), the creators of the website, purports to be a campaign for internet users' rights, in fact the site is owned by big telecom companies and various right-wing groups. It is actually a front to push the telecom industry's objections to internet neutrality. Such "members" of HOTI are:

# Alcatel
# The America Channel
# American Conservative Union
# AT&T
# BellSouth
# Center for Individual Freedom
# Cinergy Communications
# Cingular
And more...

Check it out yourself:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Hands_Off_the_Internet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right