• On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
February 25, 2009 6:51 AM PST

Telecom industry may see over $12 million in fines

by Stephanie Condon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments
Share

The FCC has proposed more than $12 million in fines for the telecommunications industry, after hundreds of carriers failed to certify that they are instituting proper protections of customer data.

The carriers either failed to file or incorrectly filed documents to the Federal Communications Commission that would confirm they had implemented a plan to protect customers' proprietary network information. In the notices the FCC sent to the more than 600 carriers that completely failed to file the paperwork, the agency proposed a fine of $20,000 for each carrier. For the carriers that filed noncompliant documentation, the FCC proposed a range of fines up to $10,000.

"I have long stressed the importance of protecting the sensitive information that telecommunications carriers collect about their customers," acting FCC Chairman Michael Copps said in a statement Tuesday. "The broad nature of this enforcement action hopefully will ensure substantial compliance with our rules going forward as the commission continues to make consumer privacy protection a top priority."

The FCC strengthened its privacy rules in 2007 by adopting additional safeguards, including carrier certification, to protect consumer data against unauthorized access and disclosure. The rules apply to all telecommunications providers and interconnected Voice over IP providers.

The carriers will have an opportunity to show that the fines are inapplicable or to appeal for reduced fines if they are unable to pay the full penalty.

Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CNET News focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie.
advertisement
Recent posts from Politics and Law
'Green' gas and diesel get boost in biofuel grants
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
eBay fined $2.5 million in French perfume case
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Spain mandates affordable broadband for all
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by umbrae February 25, 2009 7:43 AM PST
Would be nice to have a list of those Telecos so we can avoid them...
Reply to this comment
by Warhaven February 25, 2009 9:59 AM PST
Good. And then they should find them again for taking that $44 billion back in 1996 and not upgrading our broadband infrastructure. We should have had fiber, or ethernet if they had listened to Cisco, running throughout California by 2000. But, like every other major corporation given a huge irresponsible sum of money from the government, they took the money and ran without any sort of repercussion.

I think I'll go declare myself a bank like American Express and get in on some of the federal stimulus money, even though I don't really need it.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan February 25, 2009 11:39 AM PST
Fining companies like this means nothing to the telcos. They simply pass the fine on to customers as yet another fee. And better yet, they can keep the fee going long after the fine has been paid for, which results in even more profitability.

Fines end up *helping* the telcos in such cases.
Reply to this comment
by Cliffro February 25, 2009 1:15 PM PST
I wonder if this is why when I've setup a landline twice in recent history, once with AT&T and just recently with TimeWarner, That I get phone calls within days of activation from Salespeople asking for me specifically.
Reply to this comment
by carlnunes February 25, 2009 1:38 PM PST
$20,000 fine is nothing to a telecoms. It's just going to raise the price of customer data/information; which is more valuable then ever.

Customers will see higher requirements for personal data when signing up for services; as this additional information will help the telecoms bottom line when selling customer data/information.
Reply to this comment
by Tech-Guy February 25, 2009 1:44 PM PST
This is interesting that the FCC is fining telecom's for customer data privacy, when there was no problem at all when AT&T was giving **ALL** customer data to the government. Oh well, 'tis life I suppose.
Reply to this comment
by whosyadaddy? February 25, 2009 8:22 PM PST
gripe.....gripe....gripe..... get a life people.
Reply to this comment
by mathcreative February 28, 2009 10:24 AM PST
whos why do you think we are here? We don't complain about the problems that are out their. No body know they exist.. Plus I thought all the comments above were well warranted. If you don't believe so, then tell them why with facts. Instead of just denouncing them as complainers.
Reply to this comment
by kerryvan12 March 2, 2009 12:46 PM PST
These are not the big "telco" companies. Most of these 600 companies are small businesses that were not even aware they were required to file this certification. They are not being fined for violating privacy rules. They are being fined for not filing or filing late a compliance statement they did not know they were required to file. My company filed the statement as soon as we became aware we were required to file. We are a small reseller of long distance services. We service a local community. We protect our customer privacy and don't sell our customer information. This $20,000 fine will put us out of business. The same federal government giving out billions to major companies in this bailout will put about 600 small businesses out of business by assessing a $20,000 fine for late paper work.
Reply to this comment
by RBTBABB March 12, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
kerryvan12
I too am part of the 600. I am a local reseller, we offer pre-paid home phone service. Our company is servicing about 200 accounts. Our company does not offer long distance. I am very frustrated, scared and need some advice.
Perhaps we should talk.
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right