• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
December 7, 2008 10:43 PM PST

Tech commission suggests new cybersecurity post

by Stephanie Condon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 3 comments
Share

The Department of Homeland Security has failed to ensure the nation's cybersecurity, a new report to be released Monday concludes, because the threat of cyberattacks is too vast for any one agency to tackle and must be addressed by a new White House office, as well as revised laws and government practices.

As President-elect Barack Obama fills the remaining cabinet positions in his administration, a Center for Strategic and International Studies commission is recommending Obama create a new office in the White House: the National Office for Cyberspace, headed by an Assistant to the President for Cyberspace. The Commission on Cyber Security for the 44th Presidency, an independent, nonpartisan group, releases its final report Monday after more than a year of exploring how to address the country's cybersecurity threats.

"America's failure to protect cyberspace is one of the most urgent national security problems facing the new administration that will take office in January 2009," the report says. It is "a battle fought mainly in the shadows. It is a battle we are losing."

The immediate risk lies with the economy, the report concludes, given the widespread use of cyberspace to conduct commerce and store intellectual property. However, the scope of threats is much more far-reaching, the commission said, with the most dangerous threats coming from the militaries and intelligence services of other nations.

President Bush charged the DHS with combating cyberterrorism when he created the department in 2002. The DHS runs the National Center for Cybersecurity, yet it is not prepared to address cybersecurity threats, the Government Accountability Office reported in September. The National Cyber Security Initiative established by President Bush in January has received harsh criticism as well, particularly for being too secretive.

Monday's report acknowledges the next administration will have to strengthen the DHS but concluded that even a bolstered DHS "is not the agency to lead in a conflict with foreign intelligence agencies or militaries, or even well organized international cyber criminals."

One of Obama's earliest actions as president, the commission recommends, should be to make a statement declaring cyberspace a vital national asset that will be protected by all instruments of national power.

A new White House office, new regulations
That would mean putting in place a national, comprehensive strategy led by a National Office for Cyberspace and an Assistant to the President for Cyberspace, the commission said. The recommended executive office, staffed with 10 to 20 employees, would merge the DHS National Center for Cybersecurity and the Joint Inter-Agency Cyber Task Force (created by the Director of National Intelligence).

The new office should take a "federated approach" to governing across agencies, modeled after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the commission said.

Along with the new office, Obama should establish a new cyberspace directorate in the National Security Council that absorbs existing Homeland Security Council functions, the commission recommended.

"The split between 'homeland' and 'foreign' makes no sense for cybersecurity and, in a globalized world, makes little sense for U.S. security in general," the report reads.

The NOC's overarching responsibilities would include issuing security standards for cyberinfrastructure to other agencies and monitoring their compliance. To best achieve this, the commission said, the Federal Information Security Management Act would have to be revised to allow the NOC to more closely monitor other agencies' cybersecurity efforts.

Other new regulations could include a mandatory requirement for agencies to contract only with telecommunications carriers that use secure Internet protocols.

Criminal laws, like the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act, also need to be reviewed, the commission said, to reflect modern realities like the potential need for rules for remote online execution of a data warrant.

Partnerships abroad and in the private sector
As the U.S. reinforces its own cybersecurity practices, it should continue to do so at the international level as well, the commission said. The U.S. should encourage other nations to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, it said, and can reinforce such international cybersecurity norms with the threat of sanctions for noncompliance.

Better communication and trust also needs to exist between the public and private sectors, the commission said. It recommended the next president create three new public-private advisory groups dedicated to cybersecurity, including a presidential advisory committee to provide a line between the White House and executives from critical cyberinfrastructure companies.

The commission's report identified four critical cyberinfrastructures: energy, finance, the converging information technology and communications sectors, and government services.

"They form the backbone of cyberspace," the report says.

Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CNET News focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie.
advertisement
Recent posts from Politics and Law
'Green' gas and diesel get boost in biofuel grants
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
eBay fined $2.5 million in French perfume case
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Spain mandates affordable broadband for all
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by n3td3v December 8, 2008 12:14 AM PST
None of these recommendations are needed and are a waste of money, now why don't the DHS listen to n3td3v and create something worth while like the security industry software license scheme that is the best idea to regulate attack platform security software from getting into the hands of the bad guys in the first place, which are only ment to be used for penetration testing purposes by the security professional community. Though the DHS don't want to take recommendations from people like me, they prefer to take recommendations from ********* like Marcus Sachs who don't know the real issues and what solutions are needed, because they don't know the street like n3td3v does.
Reply to this comment
by OBAMANATION December 8, 2008 12:42 AM PST
I have watched regulation after regulation created on a national and international basis. Every year the NDSS Security Symposium brings computer scientist together from around the world to discuss Internet security. We don't need more regulation, we need freedom. We don't need oversight, we need more insight. We don't need lawyers, reporters and others passing laws that they don't even understand. We do need is someone that understands a cylinder based system that is self cleaning.
Reply to this comment
by cmaurand December 8, 2008 1:39 PM PST
Eliminate ActiveX from Microsoft products and the security holes will be closed.
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right