• On GameFAQs: Is it OK to lay my Wii down on its side?
November 17, 2008 4:02 PM PST

District court halts keylogger spyware sales

by Stephanie Condon

A U.S. District Court has temporarily halted the sale of RemoteSpy keylogger spyware at the request of the Federal Trade Commission, which claims the software violates the FTC Act.

The FTC filed a complaint (PDF) against Florida-based CyberSpy Software on November 5, alleging the company has violated the FTC Act by selling software that can be deployed remotely by someone other than the owner or authorized user of a computer, can be installed without the owner's knowledge, and can used to surreptitiously collect and disclose personal information. The FTC also claims CyberSpy unfairly collected and stored personal information gathered with RemoteSpy.

In its complaint, the FTC asked the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, to issue a temporary restraining order halting the sale of RemoteSpy while its case is pending, permanently ban the sale of RemoteSpy, and require CyberSpy to pay restitution for any injury to consumers resulting from its violations of the FTC Act.

The court, in its temporary restraining order filed November 6 against CyberSpy, said there is a "substantial likelihood" that the FTC will be able to prove the spyware maker violated the FTC Act.

"The sale and operation of RemoteSpy is likely to cause substantial harm to consumers that cannot be reasonably avoided and is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition," the court wrote. "The likely harm includes financial harm (including identity theft) and endangering the health and safety of consumers."

Along with barring CyberSpy from selling RemoteSpy, the restraining order bars the company from disclosing or making available any information obtained through the software. It also requires CyberSpy to ensure any Web sites associated with the product, including www.remotespy.com, are not publicly accessible.

The FTC's complaint names Tracer R. Spence, the registered agent and manager of CyberSpy, as liable for the charges against the spyware maker.

CyberSpy's possible violations were first brought to light to the FTC in a complaint (PDF) filed in March by the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Though other federal agencies have been known to use keylogger software, the FTC has been challenging the distribution of spyware for the past four years.

Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CNET News focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie.
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Politics and Law
Going rogue? Palin bans gadgets, reporters from speech
Europe getting 'Internet freedom' law
Fiorina's first act as senator: Merge California and Nevada
Congress may require ISPs to block fraud sites
New York antitrust suit accuses Intel of bribery
Report: Oracle not yielding to EU with Sun buy
Spring Design seeks injunction barring Nook sales
Barnes & Noble hit with suit over Nook
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by RicABlair November 17, 2008 5:11 PM PST
In laymen's terms, a TRO is what is considered an "extraordinary remedy." It is not granted too often because money damages most times suffice to make parties whole. If a court issues a TRO , then it believes the one seeking the TRO can prove at trial (not at a preliminary hearing, not mentioned above)--what it complains of. This is a fairly stringent standard.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis November 18, 2008 7:38 AM PST
True. VERY rarely will a court issue a temporary restraining order when there is no apparent threat to someone's life. For them to do it in this case..... they must have a very good case. Really, all keylogging software should be made illegal. As should all spyware, deceitware (stuff that doesn't do what it purports to do on your system), and malware.
by sanenazok November 17, 2008 7:02 PM PST
Reading the complaint....just change some names around you have the case against EA's DRM.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis November 18, 2008 7:33 AM PST
samenazok.... you are right. Just change names around and change a few words here and there, and you have a ready-made case against DRM in general. Really, DRM has never been necessary. It just punishes those who buy software legally, and doesn't stop people who REALLY want to pirate from doing so.
The real thing that companies have to do is LOWER THEIR PRICES. Stop trying to milk the American consumer for every single cent you don't get overseas because of pirating.
Reply to this comment
by inachu November 18, 2008 11:48 AM PST
I agree 100%!

$60 for a pc game....NUTS!
by inachu November 18, 2008 11:48 AM PST
With this logic then it would also ban similar software that is owned by the FBI,CIA,NSA
Reply to this comment
by Harrison912 November 18, 2008 12:05 PM PST
As a web site owner of safety and security products, we have to be careful banning products that are used for good purposes just because a few bad people find ways to use them for criminal activity.

We wouldn't consider banning computers just because bad people use them to send viruses to other computers or to steal people's identities. We wouldn't ban cars because they're used in bank robberies or for sexual assaults. We wouldn't ban cell phones because they're used by bad people to take pictures that can harm another's reputation or cause accidents when people try to drive and text so why would we want to ban keyloggers because bad people use them in a harmful way.

Parents can use them to keep an eye on their children's internet activity to make sure they aren't being stalked by online predators or online bullies. Companies use them to make sure their computers are being used for the purpose they are intended and law enforcement use them to gain the evidence they need to prosecute suspected criminals.

To coin an old phrase, "Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.". Let's be smart and go after the offender not the tool they are using to do their dirty work.
Reply to this comment
by jlees November 18, 2008 8:19 PM PST
Thats right We should be more like Russia under Stalin and Germany under Hitler they they spied on everyone, I mean isn't it a good thing to spy on people
by mk1286 December 7, 2008 5:08 PM PST
I could not agree more with you, Harrison912. I am a customer of RemoteSpy and use the product to monitor my child's use on the computer. I now feel safe knowing what my child is looking at and doing on the computer while I am away. RemoteSpy has updated their blog with a press release, you can review it here: http://www.remotespy.com/blog/
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right