• On The Insider: Miley Cyrus in Sex and the City 2
November 13, 2008 4:00 AM PST

A new Congress, a new approach to technology?

by Stephanie Condon
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

Presidential elections may capture the public's attention, as Barack Obama's victory did last week, but the less glamorous work in the U.S. Congress tends to prove more important for technology topics.

In general, much of today's current congressional leadership will continue unchanged into the next, albeit with some complications such as Obama's departure and some narrow Senate races including Minnesota's. Whatever the outcome, Democrats are likely to be newly emboldened and may be eager to approve legislation that stalled in the 110th Congress, including spyware regulations and a shield law that would protect some bloggers.

The outlook is complicated by some shuffling in House and Senate committee leadership, which is expected to take place next week. Two politicians are jockeying over chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce Committee, which includes green tech and Internet regulation in its portfolio. And increased interest in intellectual property issues in the House Judiciary Committee has led John Conyers (D-Mich.) to reorganize a key subcommittee.

Same issues, new players
Energy-related legislation will be one area of expected focus, though a continued economic downturn could divert attention or Treasury funds.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi "has taken a personal leadership role in identifying and advancing a house innovation agenda, which didn't really get as far as it should have," said Robert Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. "Republicans are generally less oriented to pro-active policies to spur innovation--they're more interested in reducing barriers to innovation."

Other issues expected to be addressed again next year include Net neutrality, consumer privacy issues such as regulation over electronic medical records, and patent reform.

Kay Hagan, the incoming Democratic senator for North Carolina, touted Net neutrality on the campaign trail.

In the House, look for Conyers and Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), chairman of the Telecommunications and the Internet panel in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, to take the lead. On the Senate side, senators like Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) are likely to remain focused on tech-related issues.

Some new members are expected to bolster the Democrats' commitment to tech issues, "particularly Mark Warner who is very technology savvy," said Atkinson. Warner, the former Democratic governor of Virginia, was elected to fill the seat of retiring Republican Senator John Warner.

After the election, Computer and Communications Industry Association President Ed Black praised the new Democratic senators for their tech-friendly platforms, noting that Mark Udall of Colorado and Kay Hagan of North Carolina both pledged their support for Net neutrality during their campaigns.

Some uncertainties exist on the tech policy front, like who will chair the Senate Republican High Tech Task Force since Chair Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) lost his seat last week. A senior aide to the task force said Republican leadership has yet to determine who will chair the group, but its agenda will remain focused on issues like broadband deployment, immigration reform, and securing U.S. competitiveness in the global high-tech marketplace.

Additionally, some Democratic agenda items, which call for more spending, and presumably higher taxes to fund those projects, could fall by the wayside if moderate Democrats insist on maintaining a pay-go system.

Musical chairs
It will be more clear how Congress intends to address tech policy once the Democratic caucus decides upon committee chairs next week.

"In both chambers, the committee makeup plays a significant role in what issues come forward," said Betsy Mullins, vice president of government and political affairs for TechNet, a bipartisan technology lobbying group. "Having certain champions and people who understand your issues can only help you."

In the senate, Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii) is expected to replace Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.V.) as chair of the Appropriations Committee, leaving open his chairmanship of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.

Sen. John Rockefeller (D-W.V.) would logically assume the leadership role of the Commerce Committee, though his office declined to comment on the subject. In that position, he would assume responsibility for Congressional oversight of the digital television transition, which many expect to be fraught with complications.

Sen. John Rockefeller (D-W.V.), a longtime broadband proponent, is likely to be the new Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee chair.

The committee has jurisdiction over a number of tech issues, and Mullins said Rockefeller would probably push forward broadband deployment legislation, as he has tried to do for years, and would encourage public-private partnerships in scientific research.

Critical subcommittees in the Senate Commerce Committee could face big changes as well. The science, technology, and innovation subcommittee is currently chaired by Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), who is rumored to be a potential candidate for a cabinet position in the next administration.

It's also possible the next Commerce chair could reinstate the communications subcommittee, which Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) eliminated in 2005, greatly reducing the influence in the committee of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). Kerry would be in line to assume that leadership role, but Dorgan--a strong Net neutrality proponent--could be a more likely choice, some have said.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) has been a natural Silicon Valley ally as chair of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The committee may function differently even if Bingaman remains in that role, however, with the retirement of ranking Republican member Pete Domenici who, as the other senator from New Mexico, worked closely with Bingaman. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), as the next-most senior Republican member of the committee, may fill the GOP leadership role.

Power play
On the House side, a battle is brewing over the chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce Committee. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), who currently chairs the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is bidding to replace Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) as head of Energy and Commerce. Dingell, who has chaired the committee for 28 years, is defending his seat with strong support from other Democrats.

Waxman's challenge is a "stunning" development, said a representative from the communications industry, given Dingell's longstanding history in the committee. While both congressmen are considered to be smart and tough politicians, he said, Dingell is more business-friendly, which could be important, given the state of the economy.

As an ally of the auto industry, Dingell does not always win the approval of environmental groups but is seen as being able to work across party lines. In October, he introduced legislation to cut greenhouse gas emissions with Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.).

"Dingell has a long record of fostering communications and technology issues," said an Energy and Commerce Committee spokesperson, that includes promoting competition among communications service providers and overseeing preparation of the digital TV transition.

Still, Waxman said in a statement (PDF), "My record shows that I have the skill and ability to build consensus and deliver legislation that improves the lives of all Americans."

The House Judiciary Committee is also in flux, now that Conyers has decided to restructure the courts, the Internet, and intellectual property subcommittee. Intellectual property will now be under the jurisdiction of the full committee; antitrust topics get their own subcommittee.

Subcommittee Chair Howard Berman (D-Calif.) announced earlier this year he would give up his position to chair the House Foreign Affairs Committee instead, so the vacancy created an convenient time to restructure the subcommittee.

A Judiciary staff member said interest in intellectual property issues has grown dramatically in the full committee, so the change gives more members a chance to weigh in on the issue. He said it is still undetermined who will chair the subcommittee.

There has been speculation that another leadership role critical to technology could end up changing hands in a House Energy and Commerce Committee subcommittee.

Ed Markey (D-Mass.), a politician prone to grandstanding on topics like the iPhone and AT&T, may be interested in giving up that spot in order to chair the energy and air quality subcommittee, some insiders believe. The move would allow him to more effectively work on energy legislation. Markey also chairs the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. Markey's office declined to comment about the chairmanships.

Stephanie Condon is a staff writer for CNET News focused on the intersection of technology and politics. She is based in Washington, D.C. E-mail Stephanie.
advertisement
Recent posts from Politics and Law
Psystar said to have deal with Apple
eBay fined $2.5 million in French perfume case
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosed
IBM staffer posts pics on Facebook, loses benefits
Congress may probe leaked global warming e-mails
Spain mandates affordable broadband for all
Town to photograph every car that enters and leaves
Dot-com thinking for D.C.: Expert Labs debuts
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ferretboy88 November 13, 2008 4:41 AM PST
Obama will focus more on taking money from people who work and giving it out to those who don't. Tech is on his last page.
Reply to this comment
by zizzybaloobah November 13, 2008 5:22 AM PST
"New" Congress? Really? Nearly everyone running for re-election in a Congress that has an even lower approval rating than the President is returning. A few changed seats here and there hardly make for a new Congress, much a Congress that has the expertise and leadership to make the tough decisions that need to be made.
Reply to this comment
by xylyx3d November 13, 2008 6:41 AM PST
zizzybaloobah and ferretboy88, you are entirely correct. the only thing that has changed is karl marx is now president. the same old dysfunctional congress is in session
Reply to this comment
by Spartanicus November 13, 2008 10:53 AM PST
Oh give it a rest. How about replying to the content of the article? By speaking of Marxism and the like you are simply marginalizing yourself.

How about something constructive? We know that the congress has been previously pretty bad with tech. Now is an opportunity to make some headway into better thinking. Demand it of your reps. It certainly beats whining about the election you lost.
by UITD November 13, 2008 6:58 AM PST
Are you effin kidding me? This Congress AND this new president do something about technology? WHY? Because he had a nice new fancy web site that he was able to brainwash the masses from? This same hypocrite and fraud, Obama, refused to hand over any documentation that would prove his eligibility to become president of the USA under the Constitution YET he will be background checking EVERYONE who wants to work for him in the White House and his administration. What a effin hypocrite. This ineligible president that many of you out there voted for has FLEECED you big time. And your new Lord Obama will continue to take from you but he wont be giving it to the poor. He needs the poor to NEED him, he'll just hoard what he takes for himself and his terrorist friends.

With less than a 10% approval rating, dont expect anything from do-nothing Pelosi and whackjob Reid. And, dont think your new president has a fighting chance to do much himself either. This coward voted "present" at every session, never introduced a bill himself and doesnt know up from down -- yet you buffoons made him president.

Do you know what BOHICA means? Look it up. Open wide. :-)
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 November 13, 2008 8:34 AM PST
Manhattan 2 Project. That is what is needed. We are bringing the best minds in the tech world together to put technology to the test. Security, Energy Conservation, Exploration, and Public Safety. All these projects are underway by the engineers at the Manhattan 2 project.

Solar Transfer phase 1 and 2 is just the beginning. The Government is not where the answer is this time around.
Reply to this comment
by Captain Bebops November 13, 2008 9:42 AM PST
Since when has Congress ever understood tech issues? Just look at how they legislate them. They are throwbacks to the 19th century. They are obsolete and need to be deleted.
Reply to this comment
by Spartanicus November 13, 2008 11:00 AM PST
I'd like to see some recognition for the value of open source and open standards - at the governmental level these are particularly important. Support for open standards will help the interoperability challenges the govt will face in myriad systems, and open source is essential for certain technologies, e.g. voting machine software.
Reply to this comment
by keschrich November 13, 2008 12:22 PM PST
The best thing congress could do to help the tech industry is not get involved. Increased regulation does not foster innovation- it suppresses it.
Reply to this comment
by cohaver November 13, 2008 2:04 PM PST
Best thing would be for Congress not be a group of Lawyers but end users that Use Technology .
Some the Telephone is little hard to understand. Day's of Mr Smith going to Washington DC is what America needs not Group people who never lived in the Real World .
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right