EFF sues U.S. over NSA surveillance program
The Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a lawsuit Thursday against the Bush administration on behalf of AT&T customers to halt what it called the "massively illegal" warrantless surveillance of Americans' Internet and telephone communications.
In addition to suing the National Security Agency, the nonprofit Internet advocacy group also names President George Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Cheney's chief of staff David Addington, and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, as well as others.
"For years, the NSA has been engaged in a massive and massively illegal fishing expedition through AT&T's domestic networks and databases of customer records," senior staff attorney Kevin Bankston said in a statement. "Our goal in this new case against the government, as in our case against AT&T, is to dismantle this dragnet surveillance program as soon as possible."
The EFF said the evidence it would present is the same evidence central to a class-action lawsuit it filed in 2006 accusing AT&T of opening up its telecommunications facilities to the NSA for use in spying on the phone calls and e-mails of "millions of ordinary Americans." Such a practice violates free speech and privacy rights spelled out by the U.S. Constitution and also runs afoul of federal wiretapping law, the EFF claimed.
The ACLU won a brief victory in a similar case filed against the NSA when a federal judge ruled in 2006 that the NSA's surveillance program "ran roughshod" over Americans' constitutional rights Americans and violated federal wiretapping law. However, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the suit in 2007 on narrow procedural grounds without addressing the legality of the program. The suit effectively died earlier this year when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene in an appeal.
In July, the Senate approved a bill that would rewrite federal wiretap laws by granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies as long as the government claims the request was "lawful" and authorized by the president.
After the EFF's 2006 lawsuit was filed, reports of a secret room in an AT&T building in San Francisco surfaced and have become central to the nonprofit group's litigation.
Although EFF's lawsuit was filed before allegations about the room surfaced, reports of its existence have become central to the nonprofit group's attempts to prove AT&T opened its network to the NSA. Former AT&T employee Mark Klein released documents in 2006 alleging the company spliced its fiber optic cables and ran a duplicate set of cables to Room 641A at its 611 Folsom Street building.
The deleted portions of a legal brief accidentally released in 2006 sought to offer benign reasons why AT&T would allegedly have a secret room at its downtown San Francisco switching center that would be designed to monitor Internet and telephone traffic. (AT&T has publicly neither confirmed nor denied cooperating with the National Security Agency.)
Initial details of the surveillance program surfaced in late 2005 in a Los Angeles Times article that quoted an unnamed source as saying the NSA has a "direct hookup" into an AT&T database that stores information about all domestic phone calls, including how long they lasted.
Steven Musil is the night news editor at CNET News. Before joining CNET News in 2000, Steven spent 10 years at various Bay Area newspapers. E-mail Steven. 




Ummm....98 percent of Google's political contributions went to Democrats, the biggest share among top tech donors.
The spyware peddling facists at Google are all Democrats. Blame them.
http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/14/technology/google_democrats/index.htm
This brings about a conundrum for modern geeks as we're all funneling money to these evil entities. Every time you buy an iPhone and paying your monthly subscription bill to AT&T, Verizon, Comcast etc, you're ultimately supporting AT&T and their domestic spying abuses. And as long as a Republican is in power, they'll make up excuses to keep their domestic spying going with phantom menaces and other mysterious claims that cannot be substantiated.
I love my iPhone, but I absolutely deplore AT&T and the hick CEO that runs it who bends over for the NSA.
Unfortunately, all the major telcos/ISPs have grabbed their ankles. I've read that the NSA has a direct line to Verizon with access greater than that of Verizon's own sysadmins.
http://gizmodo.com/364435/whistleblower-says-the-feds-are-spying-on-your-verizon-mobile-phone-too
Nice try.
Lets just take a look at the massive wiretap program that took place under the Democrats under Bill Clinton shall we?
In 1994, Clinton administration Attorney General Janet Reno launched infiltrators, wiretaps, mail monitoring, and a wide range of other spying activities in a massive coordinated effort that included the FBI; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms; U.S. Postal inspectors; the U.S. Marshalls Service; and other Federal and local law enforcement agencies.President Bill Clinton had acted decisively to fight what he and First Lady Hillary Clinton deemed the most dangerous terrorist threat facing America: conservative Christians
More than 900 targets of all this surveillance included the Christian Coalition, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Women?s Coalition for Life, Feminists for Life, Americans United for Life, the 600,000-member Concerned Women for America, the National Rifle Association, the American Life League, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, and even then-Roman Catholic Cardinal of New York John O?Connor.
So don't talk to me about those 'bad" wiretapping Rerpublicans. At least the Republicans started these wiretaps after the biggest terrrorist attack in Amercan history, with threats of more tattacks to come. What excuse did Bill Clinton have?
There is a difference between wiretapping with a warrant and wiretapping without.
Your tin foil conspiracies notwithstanding, Republican rule has brought the US to the brink of permanent decline.
Naaaah.
History has shown that the one calling himselk "TheDecider" is the world''s most supid indidvidual, who makes the most moronic statements on this site.
And hey, tell your Al Quaeda pals we are gonna come take 'em out, ok?
The_Decider : "There is a difference between wiretapping with a warrant and wiretapping without"
I suggest you'de better check BJ Clintons' wiretaping programs, and the outrageous abuses that were perpetuated by him and his Attorney General Reno.
And oh, BTW, Google is still the world's biggest peddler of spyware.
The_Decider : "Republican rule has brought the US to the brink of permanent decline."
Is that why the US economy has outgrown that of the EU,m every single year of the Bush administration?
And how are your Al Quaeda pals and 72 virgins doing, Mr. Zarqawi?
Name me even one country on this planet, that has more freedoms than America. And don't even think of mentioning Europe. I lived in Britain for some years. Not only do they not have anything even close to the first amendment, they have nothing close to the second amendment or a lot of the feeedoms we enjoy in this country. And the British MI 5 intelligence service has been spying on the British for DECADES, long before Al Quaeda or 9/11.
@ krujaw : "Don't let your country turn into another empire - all empires fall"
Unlike Europe , the Britsh Empire, The Roman Empire, The Greek Empire, The Turkish Empire, etc, the United States had never had coloniy grabbing as a policy. We fought, spilled our blood to save Europe in WWi and WWII, then pumpded hundreds of billions of dollars to rebuild the European economies, and helped establish democracies there.
@ krujaw : "Take example of Israel - they have been attacked way more frequently and, yet, they haven't invaded and indefinitely occupied any country "
Ummm..Isreal invaded and occupied South Lebanon for 20 years.
Israel occupied the Sanai Penninsular (part of Egypt) for decades, after Egypt attacked Israel in the Yom Kippur War back in 1973.
Now why don't you check your fact s before you spew?
To those who wish to point fingers at one party or the other, they are both complicit in this spying on citizens. We have been deluged with a host of unconstitutional laws in the name of "security", supported by both parties, and our Constitution has been trampled for decades. Until America wakes up and realizes that the current political duopoly is an illusion to divide us, we will continue down the path to either Socialism or Fascism, with the end result being the same, a totalitarian police state. Quit voting for the "lesser of 2 evils", pick a 3rd party whose views most closely align with yours, and send the message that you are sick of our political circus. Your vote will not be wasted, you have nothing to lose.
Quit defending the loss of your rights. Leaders have given reasons to their people since the dawn of time to give up their rights. Never once has it led to anything good. Terrorism is an ideal not a country. It is water through a sifter. These wars will only enrage new generations of foreigners. In the mean time we loose the freedom we prided ourselves on.
Slowly we are moving from computer users, to objects withing a computerized system. As more things integrate, GPS, Car, Cell Phone, Lap tops, you are directed what to do and not choosing. The controls are being built now. I.E. wire taping on a scale so large it encompasses an entire country. Those that spout let them listen, I have nothing to hide are ignorant to history. Oppressive governments only get more oppressive. The laws they can make you would think laughable now, till you live under them. Try getting certified to take your own child to the pool. Some in Brittan have too now!
Your history lesson is also well-taught, although be careful with your American history - American colonialism exists, it is just different and more modern and mature in nature, as befits a nation that is itself much younger than those you refer to. I wouldn't characterise Iraq or Afghanistan as colonialism-in-disguise, but look back in history to the Philippines (1899-1935), the Danish West Indies (bought by the USA, and now the American Virgin Islands), or even, during the period of the Marshall Plan that you mentioned so eloquently, the offer of $100MM US for Greenland.
End of story.
It is truly shameful that he will manage to leave office without being held accountable for his illegal acts, by Impeachment, against Us, The People.
The Congress has truly let us all down by refusing their Constitutional Mandate to defend the American People and the Constitution from these abuses and they should be ashamed.
If it weren't for such Organizations as EFF no one would be trying to protect our Rights at all and they should be commended for doing what our 'Elected' Politicians refuse to do.
"Anyone who trades liberty for safety deserves neither!" As a veteran who has watched men die to stop actions such as illegal tapping, torture and secret trials in other nations, I believe these men would turn in their graves to see America acting like this!
Mark Heiinemann
- by ftwain September 23, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
- For more information about this suit and some legal perspective, visit:
- Reply to this comment
-
(26 Comments)http://www.atelier-us.com/e-business-and-it/article/electronic-frontier-foundation-sues-nsa-bush-administration-for-warrantless-surveillance-of-americans