'New York Times' goes social with TimesPeople

CNET News.com's Caroline McCarthy interviews two NYTimes.com
software engineers for a video in collaboration with Beet.tv.
Note: The spelling of Derek Gottfrid has been corrected.
(Credit: Beet.tv)

The New York Times has added a new feature to its Web site that takes a few cues from Facebook and Digg: TimesPeople, now in beta.

TimesPeople users can build up friends lists and can see a "news feed" of which stories their friends are recommending, sharing, and commenting on. Times online readers have been able to comment on stories, as well as rate reviewed restaurants and movies, for some time now, but recommending is new.

The TimesPeople drop-down menu, with a news feed and people search.

(Credit: NYTimes.com)

TimesPeople is currently available only as a Firefox browser plug-in, but software engineers told CNET News.com that it would eventually be more widely available and without a download required. New features will be added too, but don't expect the venerable newspaper to try to compete with Mark Zuckerberg: Engineers stressed that the Times will always be an information source, not a social network. That's why the TimesPeople application is extremely light and minimal--profiles are limited to locations and user icons, and content from the social feature is limited to a "news feed" page and a drop-down menu. However, at some point, a "Most Recommended" tab may join the popular "Most E-mailed" story list that the Times' site displays.

The TimesPeople iPhone interface.

(Credit: NYTimes.com)

Outside NYTimes.com, you can subscribe to a feed of an individual's activity using RSS, or browse your friends' updates with a specialized iPhone interface; TimesPeople members can also push their updates to their Facebook profiles by syncing the two. And if you'd rather just be an observer, you can subscribe to friends' updates on NYTimes.com while leaving your own feed updates turned off.

Many print publications have been working on social-news projects, primarily by partnering with existing sites like Digg. Conde Nast's Wired Digital went ahead and acquired Reddit. Critics might say that by building a social-news technology in-house, the Times is hurting itself by not tapping into the user base of an existing site.

But here's the catch: while NYTimes.com content is free, it requires a log-in to read more than a story or two at a time. The Times, consequently, has millions of user accounts already on file.

This story was researched and reported in collaboration with Andy Plesser of Beet.tv, who produced the video.

[jeffmcneill]

Too bad the Firefox extension freezes up the browser. Boo.

[MeeKaill]

Please don't let the NYT's fall like the Washington Post. The biggest reason the Washington Post fell was because they had the same people doing the same job for far to long. I'm not saying fire someone after,2 terms or 8 years but move them to another job, e.g. alternate workers so they don't get stale. You'll find more incentive in not only your staff, but your readers as well. I can see it coming, because it' happened to NYC&Co. and they merged with 3 other corporations. When you have the same artist painting the same signs for over ten years, they don't get better, they get lazy, and people stop recognizing the signs. Just a thought from one reader that would like to see more coverage of horse racing, the only sport in the world where you can take a small amout of money and have a chance of winning much more than you wager. Dr. MikeLBell, NYC