• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
November 6, 2007 3:53 PM PST

New advertising strategy is a big gamble for Facebook

by Caroline McCarthy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments

NEW YORK--When Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg spoke to a room full of reporters shortly after announcing the company's new Facebook Ads initiative, it became clear that this move is a risky one. Facebook Ads, with its focus on "trusted referrals," is heavily rooted in viral distribution tactics. And it's well-known by now that while a viral phenomenon can reach soaring levels of popularity, it can also become synonymous with in-your-face annoyance.

Zuckerberg was insistent that Facebook users will appreciate the fact that they'll be seeing advertisements that cater specifically to their interests and that showcase recommendations from their friends. "It seems like people prefer targeted ads. They just perform way better," he said. "The point that we're trying to make today is that it's way more organic and natural."

But there are questions--some big ones. One reporter voiced skepticism over the fact that because they're advertisements, the "trusted referrals" will only extend to positive reviews, whereas a major component of real-life recommendations among friends is what not to buy.

Perhaps more troubling is the fact that if you sign up as a "fan" of an advertiser group on Facebook--a brand of sneakers, for example--your name will automatically run alongside "Social Ads" for that brand in your friends' profiles, and Zuckerberg said that there's not yet a way to opt out of that.

"This is the first iteration of this," the Facebook founder assured the press as he explained that since Facebook Ads is new, the company could potentially change that no-opt-out policy for being a "fan" of a group. "When we announce a product, we want to also launch it (but) I wouldn't say that what we're launching today is the final version."

He promised that the company would act quickly if any concerns arose.

Forrester Research analyst Jeremiah Owyang emphasized that Facebook is still being very careful. "User backlash should be low for a few reasons," he said. "One, only two Social Ads display per day, (and) two, since users have become fans of a brand (opt in) they personally endorse, they ask for it." Essentially, they're getting what they're paying for, Owyang said in an e-mail interview with CNET News.com. "Since there's already ads on Facebook (flyers, banner ads, and sponsored groups) this is nothing new to a system where the features are free."

To add to Facebook's caution, the launch partners in Facebook Ads are also conscious of the potential for backlash. One of them is Sarah Chubb, president of Conde Nast's CondeNet Web division, which will be debuting tie-ins for its Epicurious and Flip.com brands on Tuesday night. "Anyone who was in that room today who's participating in this thing has probably thought very hard about that," Chubb said of the launch event in an interview with CNET News.com. "What's going to be interesting for anybody who's using the service as an advertiser is figuring out which kind of messages get the best reception--I think any one of us would risk alienating people."

But Chubb is ultimately optimistic. "We're advertising our sites and ultimately probably our magazines as well, and our sites are based on very vertical categories of interest like food and travel. Because those are sort of the things that people like to badge themselves with and share on Facebook anyway," she said, "we think that we don't run much risk."

Speaking with the press, Zuckerberg also answered questions about exactly what Microsoft has to do with Facebook Ads in light of its $240 million stake in the social network. The answer: not much. Redmond will be providing the "non-social" advertisements that will remain on the site.

"Microsoft is the exclusive third-party provider of IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) standard ads on Facebook. This program that we're launching, it's just a different format--they're not IAB-standard ads." Zuckerberg added that Facebook had worked the situation out with Microsoft. "We think it's a different kind of advertising."

Forrester analyst Owyang says there's no reason to suspect this wasn't the plan all along. "It's my understanding that Microsoft will continue to do what they do well--sell banner advertising and visual banners on Facebook," he said. "This has little impact to their current relationship, although it would make sense for the Microsoft Sales team to be selling these additional products to their clients. In some cases, expect banner ads to be used in a coordinated method with social ads."

At the conclusion of Zuckerberg's meeting with the press, the question arose about Google's OpenSocial platform, which has been described by some as a "Facebook killer." But the Facebook founder said it hasn't caused them to lose much sleep. "We've been so busy with this launch that we haven't had time to really look at that," he said. "We'll see after it launches."

Zuckerberg paused. "They're working on some issues."

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from The Social
'Jurassic Park' kid cast as Facebook co-founder
Farewell, triangles: AOL preps its post-Time Warner look
Brizzly opens up...and translates
Offerpal revises terms amid continued scandal
eBay sets Skype loose at $2.75 billion valuation
More on mobile payment front: Boku steps it up
SimpleGeo navigates from stealth to beta
Another music move: MySpace adds charts
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Facebook Social Ad Game - The More Specific The Better
by Albert Maruggi November 6, 2007 8:34 PM PST
If I read it right, signing up as a fan attaches my name to an ad served up to a friend of similar interest or if they are in a relevant group.

The more general the ad the less likely it will be for someone to giveaway their endorsement. However, if the ads are specific this has a nice feel to it. For example, if I like a certain halibut recipe, http://tinyurl.com/247kox, then some friend looking for fish will get my recommendation.

If however, it's just a blanket I like Chevy ad that runs randomly, not based on where my friend goes then it is less useful and more spamful.

By the way, the recipe is halibut with carrots, fennel, lemon, and garlic. Now what wine goes with that? See if I had an ad right now, that would be perfect.
Reply to this comment
Facebook Problems
by laserfix November 6, 2007 9:00 PM PST
Facebook is resorting to this strategy because of a fundamental flaw with their product: it's boring. It has no zing. The target demo is not dramatically enrolling in droves. And the target demo lacks latino and black attraction. So, the answer? Sign up big companies and try to maintain the fantasy a little longer. Six months from now: Facebook Who.
Reply to this comment
Does it justify their $15 Billion price tag?
by Jesse Chan November 7, 2007 2:20 AM PST
Does this play by Facebook to launch its advertising platform -- Social Ads & Project Beacon -- justify its current price tag? If the advertising play is successful, then "yes" what if it isn't, what is their estimated P/E ratio? http://fishtrain.com/2007/11/07/facebook-valuation/
Reply to this comment
Facebook for 15 billion
by Fireweaver November 8, 2007 11:46 AM PST
There's no way that Facebook is worth 15 billion dollars. It's one of the top 2 heavies in Social Networking in the US but someone please try to show assets or predicted income that even comes close to justifying that price tag.
Hype Hype Hype.
It's good to see that the dot com frenzied stupidity of investors hasn't gone away completely
Facebook who? Oh... duh...
by aSiriusTHoTH November 11, 2007 9:17 PM PST
Facebook who? Oh yea.. the website that is doubling the amount of signups per day over myspac.... Oh duh.. yea.. that website...

It won't be facebook who in 6 months. That is a very big under estimation of an extremely popular website. And a very bad forecasting of an extremely popular website.. on your part.
Reply to this comment
hayop!!!
by revenge666 November 11, 2007 10:28 PM PST
tangahin si kalbo!!
kilala nyo b c joe martinez ng rosario,batangas???
para sa mga nde p nakakakilala sa knya...
pwes ito xa!!
1. manyakis
2. nahuli n xang nananantsing ng isang teenager..nde q n babanggitin kung sino un..pero pg nabalitaan nyo ang pangalang..JOE MARTINEZ...lumayo na kau kc bka kau nmn ang sunod nyang mabiktima....
nde ko n muna sasabihin ang iba p niyang baho...
nxt tym n lng ulit....
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right