• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
October 29, 2009 1:33 PM PDT

Facebook spells out updated privacy policy

by Caroline McCarthy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 4 comments

Facebook head of communications Elliot Schrage posted a company blog entry on Thursday inviting members to review proposed updates to the social network's privacy policy, and much of it deals with what happens to the content of accounts that members have opted to delete.

"Specifically, we've included sections that further explain the privacy setting you can choose to make your content viewable by everyone, the difference between deactivating and deleting your account," and the process of memorializing an account once we've received a report that the account holder is deceased," Schrage wrote. Earlier this week, Facebook detailed the process of "memorializing" an account, which leaves the profile intact to current friends but hides potentially sensitive information.

Now, in the proposed new policy, which members are invited to review and comment on until November 5, Facebook explains to users that they can "deactivate" their account, which hides it but keeps information stored for potential reactivation, or alternately choose to delete it for good.

"Even after you remove information from your profile or delete your account, copies of that information may remain viewable elsewhere to the extent it has been shared with others, it was otherwise distributed pursuant to your privacy settings, or it was copied or stored by other users," the new wording explains. It's referring to content like posts and comments on other members' profile 'walls.' "However, your name will no longer be associated with that information on Facebook."

It's been a long and twisted road for Facebook's privacy regulations. The new policy was put into place after a complaint from the Canadian Privacy Commission called into question what would happen to member profile data if a user deactivated an account.

That fiasco followed outrage over changes to Facebook's terms of service that implied Facebook claimed an "irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license" to member content even if the account had been deleted. One privacy advocacy group readied a federal complaint, and Facebook backed off and returned to its old terms of service.

In July, Facebook cleaned up its user privacy controls as it prepared to open up more of its profile content to public access and search engines.

But the Canadian Privacy Commission had also taken issue with how much Facebook profile information could potentially be shared with third-party developers or advertisers. Facebook made additional modifications to its user privacy controls in August in response to concerns about the developer platform, and in Thursday's post about the new privacy policy Schrage highlighted that the social network does not intend to share personal data with advertisers.

"The information we provide to advertisers is 'anonymized,' meaning that it can't be traced back to you as an individual in any way," Schrage's post explained.

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from The Social
Facebook changes stock structure: IPO on the way?
Joost: It coulda been a contender, or not
LinkedIn's platform loosens up
'Technical issue' downs eBay search over weekend
'Jurassic Park' kid cast as Facebook co-founder
Farewell, triangles: AOL preps its post-Time Warner look
Brizzly opens up...and translates
Offerpal revises terms amid continued scandal
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by n3td3v October 29, 2009 2:23 PM PDT
The only way to know you have privacy is don't use Facebook, its widely known your personal information is being exploited by marketing companies and state intelligence services. What wording they put in the carefully crafted terms of service will never change this.
Reply to this comment
by codynews October 29, 2009 3:02 PM PDT
Wouldn't any normal person easily understand the difference between DELETING an account (should get rid of all data) and deactivating (which should just turn it off)?

I hate all this legal 1000 page TOC bullcrap. Why can't people just spell things out in short easy ways?
Reply to this comment
by sythara October 30, 2009 1:09 AM PDT
Lawyers, thats the reason.
by rickyvogay November 7, 2009 3:14 AM PST
Thanx for the valuable information. I love orkut. But my friends are spending more time on face book. So Iv got no choice but to move. but now i feel it intresting...... keep posting. Will be visiting back soon.
(<a href="http://www.r4ds.com.mx">r4</a>)
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right