October 10, 2009 8:20 AM PDT

Downed Facebook accounts still haven't returned

by Caroline McCarthy
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 76 comments

Something is really odd here.

As a reporter covering Facebook, I do get the occasional cranky complaints from members who, for one reason or another, are experiencing errors when they try to access their accounts. But it's never been anything like the past week, with a steady stream of e-mails continuing to come in from Facebook members who say they remain shut out of their accounts--despite assurance from Facebook that profiles have not been deleted and that the company is working on the problem.

"This is now seven days and counting," an e-mail sent on Saturday morning read. "It's beyond ridiculous and extremely frustrating."

"The experience completely reversed the Facebook opinion and experience for me," one reader complained. "I see many people bitch and complain, many more beg and a few threaten. To me, the route to take is fairly obvious. Mark Zuckerberg on his own page invites democratic input from Facebook users in one of his most recent videos. Given that statement especially, I find the way their user base is being treated with respect to their disabled account policy hypocritical at best."

"My account has now been held hostage for a week," another reader wrote. "Some of my friends think that I have deleted (my profile) or even blocked them...None of my friends or family can see my profile or even find it in search. It's as if I simply deleted my account or blocked all of them from seeing it without even a word."

Some users have started threads on Get Satisfaction and Yahoo Answers. A few others have pointed me to blogs and YouTube channels devoted to the subject.

The inaccessible accounts appear to be limited to a very small subset of Facebook's over 300 million active users, which means that it's not a large-scale issue for the health of the site. And Facebook is supported by neither subscription money or taxpayer dollars (though it wouldn't have advertising revenue without its users) so there's an argument to be made that users shouldn't be complaining about something they don't pay for. But that's an argument that many of the people who have come to rely on Facebook as a channel of communication simply don't buy.

Whether the string of complaints is warranted or not, Facebook hasn't disclosed exactly what's caused the "extended maintenance issue," and that's what I find puzzling.

Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline.
Recent posts from The Social
For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover
Facebook COO nominated to Disney board
Facebook app privacy: It's complicated
Snowstorm blankets Web with high shopping traffic
Big Facebook privacy void: Controls on Connect
Twitter? Profitable? Really?
Yelp bails on Google deal?
Facebook to hold spring F8 dev conference
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (76 Comments)
by jjp3 October 10, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
Thanks for continuing to follow this. It's not getting a lot of attention, so there's no pressure on FB to resolve. Where does FB say that the accounts haven't been deleted? I know they said that no accounts were "compromised". To me, that's legalese for "hacked". I'm not sure it means that the disk with my account on it didn't fail without a backup. I'm not a dba, but I can't imagine how it could take a week to get a small subset of users back online, unless they lost the data.
Reply to this comment
by codynews October 10, 2009 7:05 PM PDT
waaa. these tools crying about their twitter or facebook or other attention ***** pages being shut down for 2 minutes need to go outside and get some air and sun.

The page will be back up. If it's not, build another profile or better yet go see what the real world is like

/get off my lawn

Cody
by Piscesabitdreamy October 10, 2009 7:49 PM PDT
I too have been having the same "temporary site maintenance" issue for 7 days now. I have emailed with no response and called only to be hung up on after talking to their operator.

Due to their lack of customer service, I highly recommend everyone to file a better business complaint.

http://sanjose.bbb.org/Business-Report/Facebook-223670
by forkboy October 10, 2009 8:49 AM PDT
My initial reaction is to say that users who cannot access their account are being babies. It's a free service and there is an extended problem. Get over it.

But the longer I think about it the more I find myself agreeing with these folks. While Facebook is free there is hardly any reason to offer the service if it cannot be provided reliably, even if it is only a tiny subset of the Facebook community without access.

So where does that leave us all....
Reply to this comment
by Mweaver2k9 October 10, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
Exactly, people who rely on a free service have nothing to complain about. FB is under no obligation to do anything for you at all.
by JanasPlaceInKC October 10, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
Facebook wants people to join their service so that they can make their advertisers happy. They want people to trust them with their personal information. You may not actually "pay" to use their service, but it's only because of their subscribers that they get paid by the advertisers. No people on Facebook means no one to see the advertisements. They owe their subscribers an explanation of this whole mess and let them know what they are doing to resolve the problem, instead of putting up some lame "site maintenance" error for a week.
by qrtrnotes October 10, 2009 2:53 PM PDT
That's right! I don't PAY to see the Superbowl either....but when I watch it, the broadcast better be consistent! Otherwise, all those advertisers spending MILLIONS of dollars a minute are going to be justifiably hacked off!
by Tech Diva XXX October 12, 2009 10:06 PM PDT
Actually as a business, they should at least be under an obligation to let you know if your account is truly deleted or not. Just tell people the truth!! To keep beating around the bush or not addressing the issue properly is unprofessional.

Even if it is free to the user, they still profit from having members. Members=many visitors to the site=advertising revenue. Also bad publicity can hurt. Just address the issue and be done with it!
by strongpimphand October 13, 2009 9:21 AM PDT
Nothing is free in life. NOTHING. Facebook makes money off of you and me. So, if I can't use their product, I'm either going to not visit the site anymore (which can lead to an influx of other sites getting my time) or, I could just give up altogether and not even come back when your fix it. This can mean that me clicking on that ad on my page...well, it will never be clicked again, which could lead to less hits for that ad which could lead to a lower offer from the company to facebook for the right to advertise!

This is a problem
by jhacker October 10, 2009 9:19 AM PDT
This happened to my cousin who is serving in Iraq with the USAF. It sucks because he uses Facebook as the primary way to contact his family. I challenged him because I went to send him a message and his name wouldn't come up. I thought he removed me from his 'friends' list. However, his name came back up a few days later.

This very same thing happened to me on Myspace a few years ago. I tried to access my account, and it said there was a problem. Finally, after a few days, I e-mailed them. Of course I did not receive a response. I lost all of my friends on there!! But, a few months later I signed up with the same e-mail address. But, that Myspace experience burned me and I seldom log into my account.
Reply to this comment
by SJ2571 October 10, 2009 10:44 PM PDT
Primary way to contact his family? Never heard of email?
by gefitz October 12, 2009 2:15 PM PDT
Uh, phone? Break out a stamp?
by grizzled82 October 13, 2009 7:43 AM PDT
You know it cost the Soldiers money to make phone calls from over seas, espcially when they need to call multiple people to update them on his/her status. So the best way is to email or social netowrk. Now the social just makes it easier to see who said what a reply back rather then searching through email full of spam which can take up most of your free time if your on duty. And sending mail can take a long time to get back to the states and by then something major could have happend to the soldier. So the military personel has a rigtht to complain, they are risking their lives to protect this country.
by Hunnter2k3 October 10, 2009 9:23 AM PDT
I saw this happening with one of my friends accounts as well, but it just recently got fixed.
Reply to this comment
by jture October 10, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
I'm beginning to wonder if FB's infrastructure is the problem. I constantly have issues with posts (my own and others') disappearing, friend counts changing when I haven't added new friends, uploads failing, etc.
Reply to this comment
by krosafcheg October 10, 2009 11:09 AM PDT
Because this isn't a paid for service, isn't an argument for not taking user complaints serious - or that their voice doesn't "count" as much. Realize this, there is ABSOLUTE value to us, the user, because their valuation is based on US. Needless to say, Facebook better get on it and start the information process to it's users regarding downtimes, REAL reasons and of course all the stupid ajax transport errors we all experience. We do have a voice and we do have value, even it not directly paying for the service.
Reply to this comment
by ericstone99 October 10, 2009 11:28 AM PDT
Exactly.
by grizzled82 October 13, 2009 7:53 AM PDT
We may not pay for the site, but we are still consumers. They get paid for advertivesing which means we still have control over the site. People can still choose to boycott the site and if enough poeple do so, they will lose add revanue and then eventually the site will shut down. But lets hope it doesn't go that far.
by sting7k October 10, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
I'm pretty sure all those people will survive a without facebook for a little while. If your friends are that upset they can't see your page or think you have disappeared get on the phone or email them and tell them about it.
Reply to this comment
by codynews October 10, 2009 7:06 PM PDT
Exactly. People have forgotten out to actually communicate with people outside of social networking sites.
by bobtongue October 10, 2009 8:16 PM PDT
It's easy to say when you aren't the one with the problem. I have been locked out for a week now, you forget how much you rely on it until it's gone. I use it to keep in touch with my children and grandchildren that live far away. I also use it to store and share pictures and notes. I keep up to date with whats going on at church through the church facebook page and I keep up to date with friends and families birthdays on Facebook. The experience has shown me that I probably should rely less on facebook and keep more on my local computer. Facebook offers itself as a free service but implies a certain quality of service by asking people to keep there treasures and memories on their site. They also imply to their advertisers that all of their market will be able to see the ads that they pay for. There is no reason that anyone should accept shoddy service when a company woos you to their site and then doesn't deliver. When you can no longer access your treasures for over a week, let's see if you think it's ok because you didn't have to pay to lose your "stuff"
by SJ2571 October 10, 2009 10:45 PM PDT
"The experience has shown me that I probably should rely less on facebook and keep more on my local computer" -- precisely! All this "cloud computing" concept is rubbish, as you've discovered. Why entrust all your info to a third party? Keep it local. Use email instead, which is still usable from any number of sites, rather than relying on one (Facebook).
by grizzled82 October 13, 2009 8:08 AM PDT
@ SJ2571

Well what would you do if Gmail, yahool or hotmail had a problem and you couldn't access your account and/or deleted your info and contacts, its the same thing. The site is free, but you would still be mad. And somepeople rely on one site because they dont want to have so many account and digital foot prints. Thats why they have facebook and myspace (they can do email, IM, satust updates, and more), because you wouldnt want to have five different accounts (user name and passwords) when one site can do to all.
by Paul_PI October 10, 2009 11:50 AM PDT
Thanks Caroline for contined coverage....

It drags on and on. Should we open new accounts and spend another 6 months building up our networks, or sould we wait. If we wait, how long? The real problem is the absolute dearh of information from them. Free or not how much time woukd it take to send a group email to a few thousand users every 6 hours or so with honest estimates of when we might see a return of service and some description of the problem.

For those who think we should expect nothing from a free service, I disagree. Although expectations should probably be low ang QoS not guarenteed, we should not expect a week outage. My account was off for a day in August for maintenance and it was back within 5 hours. I would not consider griping about that, but did get a little concerned when it had been out for 2 days. I would not and have not moaned about the slow responses, the stack overflow errors or the ajax errors because the service is free. All this considered, I would also ask if these haters of free to the user servicesthat post on this free forum, if they really think it is unreasonable to be disconnected for a week with no information??

It is not as if they are not working on the problem, 2 days in acconts were still visible with friends getting a "this account is temporally unavailable try again in a short while. Now there is no such message, it says no account found. That suggests they are cleaning there data base, hopefully in preparation for reinserting the data, but how long do they need..........

In reality this must be either a lost/corrupt backup that is with the menders, or the accounts have been hacked and removed because of some common signature... In both cases the embarassment factor and potential for lost revenue might be the reason for the lack of admission. This is however rather naive, the truth will come out, it always does... Things will be worse then....

Come on FB Give us our accounts back.
Reply to this comment
by codynews October 10, 2009 7:09 PM PDT
6 months to "build your network up" ?

dude, create a new account, re-invite your friends and family. Should take 30 minutes. Might take a bit longer (a few hours?) to find some of the pics you've uploaded (they still are on your computer right?) and resubmit them... but 6 months? Common...
by grizzled82 October 13, 2009 8:49 AM PDT
@ codynews

Building up a network can take a long time. True, close friends and family can take a short time. But this site is not just to keep in touch with friends and family, it is also used for business and networking. And thosae contacts are harder to find. So yes it can take a while to build a network back up.
by silicon_valley_insider October 10, 2009 12:09 PM PDT
the reason facebook is keeping a low profile on this is because it reveals a problem with infrastructure and management. a company like facebook is only a strong as its user base -- and that user base will only use facebook as long as it trusts the company with its very personal and private data. once that user trust erodes, so goes its user base -- along with its ad dollars and, ultimately, valuation in the eyes of private investors.

facebook will eventually go public. but can you imagine if this problem (a set of users locked out for a week, and their profiles missing, with no plausible explanation) were to happen if facebook were already a public company? what would the fallout be if a service such as google docs or yahoo mail went down for a "small subset" of users?

(by the way, we can only assume "small subset" because there's no official count provided by any reliable source. the fact that facebook placed a message on the front of its help pages addressing the issue suggests the actual number of affected users isn't so small...)
Reply to this comment
by jjp3 October 10, 2009 12:46 PM PDT
If there really are 300 million accounts, an outage affecting even just one tenth of 1% is 300,000 accounts.
Reply to this comment
by garaden October 10, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
There's a lot of twitter fallout, so I'd estimate at least a hundred users, maybe as many as a thousand. That's a lot by my book.

Also, I can't agree with the "It's free, they don't owe you anything" argument. Companies like Google, despite offering free web services like Gmail, have a much better track record with these things. See this: http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/more-on-todays-gmail-issue.html. Gmail's web interface went down for *100 minutes* and a blog post was written the *same day* with precise, technical details about the problem and the steps Google was taking to prevent it from happening again!

Basically, just because Facebook isn't based on traditional company/client payment models doesn't mean they can do whatever they want. First of all, from a revenue perspective, Facebook has business relationships with hundreds of advertisers that assume their ads are getting displayed to users. This specific issue won't affect that much, but say a few *million* users experience a similar service problem.

Also, their reputation is at stake here. It's true we can't demand a refund from Facebook, which limits our leverage. But that doesn't change the fact that this is a huge frustration for us, and therefore pretty embarrassing for Facebook. Small subset, yadda yadda, but a *week*? Really?

But really, there are less cynical and more important reasons Facebook needs to be on the ball for things like this. Facebook comprises the social hub of the Internet, and that's a position that cannot be taken lightly. For many people (like me) it's the only way they can stay in touch with large groups of people simultaneously. For armed services, it's an easy way to contact their families. For many political groups it's the backbone of their campaign. For many oppressed peoples, it's a symbol of freedom. And some affected people use these accounts for their businesses, and they're losing *real money* as a result of this failure.

It's like Google's admonition, "Don't be evil". Google realizes that for such a massive company with such far-reaching power, the bottom line isn't the bottom line. They're basically directly responsible for a large part of the Internet, and they have a social contract to fulfill those duties. As far as I can tell, Mark Zuckerberg feels similarly. Companies, especially Internet companies with unusual business models, don't exist solely to make money. They exist to provide a service, and right now Facebook's breaking that contract with me. Whether or not they have a legal responsiblity, they certainly have a moral responsibility to take care of the people who depend on them.
Reply to this comment
by codynews October 10, 2009 7:11 PM PDT
Sorry, you lost me at "a lot of twitter fallout".

drama much?

Cody
by garaden October 10, 2009 8:49 PM PDT
Huh? I'm not talking about the cries of pain and rage on Twitter, that of course is nothing new, I'm just talking about the number of people reporting the problem. Which is what Twitter is best at: tracking trends.
by garaden October 10, 2009 8:53 PM PDT
Huh? I wasn't talking about the usual cries of pain and rage on Twitter about something or other, that of course is nothing new, but simply the extent of the problem. That, after all, is what Twitter does best: tracking trends.
by mjmc12 October 10, 2009 2:55 PM PDT
I have also been locked out of Facebook since Oct. 3rd. I am from Southeastern Pa. and I have been following the posts on the Get Satisfaction board also. I do not play games, answer quizzes or polls, so if this is any way of linking the people involved, I am way out of it. I do have a Mac, so I thought at first maybe it is my Mac. I can see that alot of people are saying that we should email or callthese "friends" we have on Facebook. There is one small problem there, I have been contacted only through Facebook, and there is no way of finding out their email address. The main reason I joined Facebook, was to find some of my old classmates and friends from long ago. I had been contacted by many, and they only can reach me via Facebook. This is a "free" service I agree, but so are so many other services on the web, and I have never had this problem with any of them. I will survive if I don't get my Facebook account working again, but I do feel bad that I must seem rude to these people who have no clue why I am suddenly not available. It would be nice if we could just know that we are not going to be able to get back on. Why keep us waiting and wondering why?
Reply to this comment
by October 10, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
Some people have all the luck. I've been trying to delete my Facebook account for months and I still get messages through it. I guess that makes me one of the 300 million active users.
Reply to this comment
by freshapril October 10, 2009 4:50 PM PDT
My account has been out since October 3rd as well. Facebook may offer a free service, but that doesn't mean that they do not owe their users the common courtesy of an explanation for the outage. It is implied in the offering of the service that they will maintain and keep the site running. If there has been a problem that cannot be fixed with my account, just let me know. I believe one of the reasons that facebook has been so hushed about this outage is 1. the outage is more widespread than we have been lead to believe and 2. that if investors and sponsors hear about this they will not find them as attractive of an investment and pull their money. It has been seven days, facebook needs to acknowledge the problem and their shortcomings in being able to fix the inaccessible accounts so that the members can decide whether to rebuild with a new profile or move on.
Reply to this comment
by qrtrnotes October 11, 2009 11:41 AM PDT
I have started a temporary profile which I will transfer to my husband once all this is corrected....Its pathetic that I can't live a week without Facebook!
by freshapril October 11, 2009 4:12 PM PDT
I refuse to put the time and effort into another account. What happens when it goes down? If I can't even get a response from the ONE account. I ave joined Twitter and have re-connected with some friends and fanily that way.
by gefitz October 12, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
"if investors and sponsors hear about this"? You're kidding, right? You are insane if you think that people paying money for advertising don't know about this. If they don't, they aren't viable anyway. They know about it alright, and honestly, they do not care about losing access to the couple of thousand users in a pot of hundreds of millions of accounts.

Grow up. You aren't that important.
by Piscesabitdreamy October 10, 2009 5:44 PM PDT
I too have been having the same "temporary site maintenance" issue for 7 days now. I have emailed with no response and called only to be hung up on after talking to their operator.

Due to their lack of customer service, I highly recommend everyone to file a better business complaint.

http://sanjose.bbb.org/Business-Report/Facebook-223670
Reply to this comment
by dmac1021 October 10, 2009 5:59 PM PDT
Please continue to follow this story!!! Your site is one of the only places that I can at least keep up with it as you are aware Fb has been slow with any information. I believe it's a much larger group then they are letting on given the comments on their sites, the various news blogs (w/comments) and twitter however it's hard for those 'Fb Forgotten' to organize themselves to figure out exactly how many.

I too have been down since around 3am US ET last Sunday morning. Although I socialize with many people every day in real life, I use Fb to keep up with my daughter who is 5 hours away at college with her permission (she calls it empty nest solution), my mother who has cancer and updates her status so that her grown children know if she's up to talking with us on the phone that day or not feeling well enough to do so (that way she feels in control and we aren't ringing her phone relentlessly or driving miles and miles to her house when she is not up for the company). I also use Fb to keep in touch with people from 25 years past just to say hi, check on their families and keep in touch during times where we just are not able to spend a lot of time on the phone.

I also understand the position of Fb that we are free users, fair enough, however I spend money on various applications and products advertised which in turn are probably paying Fb some type of fee, right? So as a consumer who periodically buys a product or joins a network or cause and supports that cause financially I would think that by proxy we are paying customers.

Yes, I get the fact that I should keep my contacts outside of Fb and I do for the most part however Fb is simpler to keep in touch with some/many and in some ways has become part of my normal communication processes.

Anyway... I appreciate your updates since I'm sure there are many of us out here that feel like the Fb forgotten.

Many thanks!
Reply to this comment
by xanthorp October 10, 2009 6:04 PM PDT
I want my money back! oh yeah it's free.....
Reply to this comment
by inachu1 October 10, 2009 6:24 PM PDT
Accounts are going online then offline.... mostly offline.
sometimes you can see your friends profile then BAM nothing as if they never signed up and searching for them does not find them using the search tool at the top.
Reply to this comment
by mrcjacobs October 10, 2009 8:16 PM PDT
Sucks for them. I've been sitting here at my pc non-stop for 6 months and FB has been rock solid for me. I don't know what I'd do without it. It loves me and I love it. Lol.
Reply to this comment
by hugo_goncalves October 10, 2009 9:14 PM PDT
I'm also on the bad-luck group. I already created a new profile, but it's kind of sad all this situation. I know it's a free service but just imagine if this happend to a lot more people than it did. Let's say 25% of the people were locked out. Yes, it's free but the value of the site it's all about the number of users.

And all of those people who are calling us "crying babies" and "it's a free service", you're lucky it didn't happened to you. I'd like to see your reaction if it happened to you.
Reply to this comment
by yermom October 12, 2009 11:10 AM PDT
couldn't care less.
i don't run a business through the site, nor do i use the site to organize rallies for the betterment of mankind.
sure, some people actually get something useful out of the site, and some use it as the only way to maintain a long distance relationship with family/friends, but i really don't care that 'little johnny's got a runny nose and i was up all night doing laundry'. please people. stop the drivel.
by susanb33 October 12, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
yermom- not sure why you feel the need to respond if you are not the one experiencing the outage. It IS frustrating to those of us who communicated easily with those we love on our fb accounts. i DO have a life outisde of fb but I miss the regular updates of my friends/family. It will be difficult to recreate if our accounts do not come back up. I, for one, am hoping that fb actually comes up with a fix for this issue!!
Showing 1 of 3 pages (76 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right