Survey: Over half of U.S. workplaces block social networks
A majority of U.S. workplaces block access to social-networking sites like Facebook and Twitter, new survey results commissioned by consulting firm Robert Half Technology indicate. Fifty-four percent block social networks "completely," while another 19 percent only permit it "for business purposes."
Only 10 percent of companies surveyed permit social-network use on the job for any kind of personal use; 16 percent allow "limited" personal use, according to the results released Tuesday.
The study, conducted by an independent research firm, surveyed about 1,400 chief information officers at U.S. companies with 100 or more employees, which means that the results obviously don't encompass small businesses.
Regulating social-network use at work is a complicated matter. There are some nuances that numbers like these don't bring up: "limited" personal use of social networks sounds like it could mean anything from blocking the majority (but not entirety) of social sites to simply instituting a "don't trash your boss on Facebook" rule. Some companies, additionally, may have different standards set for different degrees of employees--the guy running the company Twitter account and the human resources department may have extra privileges, for example.
There also isn't a differentiation in the results regarding which percentage of "blocked completely" workplaces use filtering software to keep employees off banned sites and which ones have a rule by which employees are supposed to abide (but might not).
Internet controls and filters in the workplace are nothing new. But social networks pose an interesting case: their potential for professional as well as personal networking, not to mention the well-publicized use of Twitter for marketing and customer service. There's also the fact that they've become so ingrained in culture and communication that some companies choosing to block them can appear draconian rather than prudent.
But they're still great for procrastination and counterproductivity, so it's not surprising that most businesses put the clamp on them.
"Using social networking sites may divert employees' attention away from more pressing priorities, so it's understandable that some companies limit access," Robert Half Technology executive director Dave Willmer said in a release. "For some professions, however, these sites can be leveraged as effective business tools, which may be why about one in five companies allows their use for work-related purposes."
Along with the survey results, the company also offered a number of tips for social networking on the job: be aware of your employer's policies, don't complain about your co-workers or boss online, and keep tabs on your usage so that it's not too much of a time suck.
Caroline McCarthy, a CNET News staff writer, is a downtown Manhattanite happily addicted to social-media tools and restaurant blogs. Her pre-CNET resume includes interning at an IT security firm and brewing cappuccinos. E-mail Caroline. 
Speaking of procrastination and counter productivity, I just read this article to avoid doing work and was saddened that this article couldn't have been longer. Now you've forced me to go procrastinate longer by reading the self righteous, soapbox rantings over at Techcrunch.
If people are getting their work done, reward them. If people aren't keeping up, get rid of them. It doesn't matter if the reason is facebook or twitter or YouTube or just basic incompetence. You don't want underperforming employees that you have to stay on top of. Get rid of the under-performers and hire people who manage their own time - and give them the freedom to do so.
My place of work is pretty anal, using the stock filters from the Smoothwall site blocking software, and then adding *tons* of custom urls (thank God for cached google sites). There are certainly certain people there that would spend nearly as much time on social sites as the girls . Funny thing is, IT could do a log search and come up with statistics for average and total number of hours ppl kept x site open on their machine. Instead, they just try and disable the behavior rather than root out the people that waste time in general. I can tell you the head of our company would be one to want to put the fear into slackers and would implement the searches given a chance.
However, our IT staff is nice enough not to bring it up to him...
Is Facebook a time waster? Yes. But so are random water cooler chit chats, many other web sites (even business sites with forums can be big time wasters). People will find other ways to waste time, if one particular method is blocked.
- by blastoffnetwork October 13, 2009 7:55 AM PDT
- That's because these places have turn into spam central. Not to mention that fact that people are obsessed with them.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)