• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
April 16, 2008 7:45 AM PDT

Reviewing the results of a ScanCafe order

by Gordon Haff

I've been on a bit of a de-cluttering jag over the past year or so. Too much paper, too much "stuff" around the house. So I've been slowly dumping the junk and selling or donating the rest.

ScanCafe Bangalore office

(Credit: ScanCafe)

This includes photographs. I had stacks of snapshots of family, friends, places, and so forth sitting around in various drawers and boxes. I had made a half-hearted effort to digitize some of the old slides previously, but scanning is really tedious work. Scanning the hundreds of photos involved here was just more than I realistically felt like tackling.

Over the past couple of years, I'd had some slide scans done locally by a small photo store and a large one. I wasn't impressed in either case. I paid about $1 per scan and the results were pretty mediocre. I don't doubt that I could have eventually tracked down someone in the Boston area who could do a better job for a reasonable cost, but we're still talking pretty big bucks for a mass scan-athon.

That's when, after reading some reviews and surfing some forums on photo sites, I decided over Christmas to box the whole lot up and send them to ScanCafe.

I recently received the results. Bottom line? Good quality and, at $0.24 per slide and $0.27 per print, the price is hard to beat.

I'll dig into my experience in a bit more detail, but let's get one thing out of the way first. The reason the prices can be so good is that the Burlingame, CA-based company does the scans at its facility in Bangalore, India. The way it works is that you ship your box of photos to Burlingame (you print out a UPS label when you place your order online), where they are batched up in a palletized air freight container and shipped to India.

Unsurprisingly, the "ship to India" part causes some intake of breath in a lot of people. However, having gone through the process and thought about it some, I think the incremental risk is pretty small. If you have a handful of photos that you would be especially heartbroken to lose, it's perfectly understandable that you might not want to trust them to a shipping company at all to send them out and get them returned. But once stuff is being shipped around anyway, the international air transport step wouldn't seem to make a big difference. In fact, given that ScanCafe is understandably sensitive to this issue, they seem to have put particular thought into both the whole logistics process and its transparency to customers.

(For what it's worth, for many years I've had slide film processed by Kodak using prepaid mailers. I had one batch of several rolls lost; I'm pretty sure it was the local Postal Service's fault on the return leg. And a couple of years ago, Kodak made such a hash of closing down its Fair Lawn processing facility that I had film missing for months. In other words, staying domestic is no guarantee.)

With that out of the way, how about the rest of the experience?

Quality. I ordered basic 3000 dpi JPEG scans of my slides and 600 dpi scans of my prints. For $0.09 more you can get higher-resolution TIFF scans. I didn't bother given that these are really "memory shots" and I'm not planning on making big prints. The overall quality was quite good. Many of the photos were old. Slides dating back to about 1960 were faded and dirty in many cases. I found the corrected color balance to be spot-on, and the general cleanup to be well done--especially for the price.

A minor caveat is that the JPEG files are relatively highly processed. This means that they look pretty good "out of the box" with relatively high saturation and dark blacks and bright whites. That's great if you want to look at and share the photos more or less as-is. It's not so ideal if you want to process them further yourself. (For $0.14 per slide you can get a TIFF scan with no processing plus a fully-processed JPEG.)

Turnaround time. This was not a particularly speedy process. In fact, it took close to three months door-to-door. As I noted earlier, there's a nice portal that lets you see where your order is, so I wasn't concerned or anything; I just wanted my scans. However, the company has recently significantly expanded their scanning facility (now 20,000 square feet) with the goal of getting turnaround down--although the nature of their operation means that's it's never going to be an especially fast option.

Customer service. I had one slight billing problem (my 8"x10" prints were charged at the rate for larger pieces of paper). I received a prompt reply to my e-mail to customer service, and the matter was resolved within a day.

Pricing. This is one of the real strengths of the service so long as you're sticking to "standard" media. This includes 35mm color negatives, 35mm color slides, and paper photos up to 8"x10". They'll do other types of scans (such as newspaper clippings and black & white negatives), but those are $0.99 each. I note that they've actually increased the price for newspaper clipping/letter/paper artwork from $0.37; they've obviously decided to focus on a specific set of high-volume media types. You get to review the scans before they're shipped back to you. You can delete up to 50 percent and not pay for them. In practice, this is probably most useful if you're having negative strips done, given that you can't specify that only specific frames be scanned. (Standard color negative scans cost $.19 per frame.)

Overall, I give ScanCafe high marks. I combined the photos on the DVD I received with other scans and digital images and was able to give my brother a nice selection of family photos. Who knows when I would have gotten to it were I doing the scans on my own?

Gordon Haff is a principal IT adviser at Illuminata and has more than 20 years of IT industry experience. He writes about what's happening with enterprise servers and data centers, "Yotta-scale" computing, and related software and device trends as part of the CNET Blog Network. Disclosure.
Recent posts from The Pervasive Data Center
Intel's James Reinders on parallelism - Part 2
Intel's James Reinders on parallelism: Part 1
Red Hat debuts virtualization management
3Leaf's modern take on NUMA
Cloud computing's dual identity
Technology takes time
I/O virtualization's competing forms
IBM tackles the virtual data center
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by slidesinaflash April 16, 2008 10:18 AM PDT
I'm going to try to make this not spammy - so I'll start with a disclosure, I own Slides in a Flash, a small company that is using digital cameras to convert slides rather than scanning. Saying that, I've found that the niches we serve are people who are looking for output in RAW the format they are used to processing for their own digital photos, and people who can't wait 3 months. Slides are usually processed and posted online within 24 hours of receiving payment (or receiving slides if they were pre-paid) and mailed back as soon as the customer is satisfied. I'd love to offer the 'discard the ones you don't want' option, but I think I'd have to charge more to start with (I'm not in India!). I also feel like that would be stealing an idea. :)

What is amazing to me is the number of companies that can exist on a tiny scale (this business is not my main source of income) despite the giants like ScanCafe. The web is an amazing equalizer, and I think this is a good thing for keeping the quality customers receive at a higher level.
Reply to this comment
by ghaff April 16, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
re: small companies. I think the reason may be that there aren't particular economies of scale unless you're talking about an international operation like this one. As for the "discard the ones you don't want," it seems mostly a gimmick to me--at least for slides and prints. I'm going to have to sort through the stuff at some point anyway so why not do it before sending out to be scanned.
by zupcsics October 5, 2009 9:27 AM PDT
Re ScanCafe: What they don't tell you about scanning negatives is that they will NOT scan individual frames.

So if you want individual negatives scanned, they will scan the entire strip, you can delete up to half, but you'll still end up paying for a lot of scans that you don't want - and they will end up on your CD/DVD as well.

Too bad, because scanning the negative will (usually) give the best results (they scan negatives to much higher resolutions). Unfortunately, this limitation makes using ScanCafe to scan negatives much more expensive than it seems, and makes the results much less convenient than scanning prints or slides.
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About The Pervasive Data Center

This blog takes a deep (and often skeptical) look at trends big and small in the world of enterprise servers, data centers, and "Yotta-scale" computing. This means also taking into account the myriad of software, networks, and devices that are driving change in (or being driven by) these back-end systems. Stories posted to this blog may also appear on Illuminata's site.

Gordon Haff is a principal IT adviser for Illuminata of Nashua, N.H. Before becoming an IT industry analyst, Gordon held a variety of product-marketing positions at Data General, spanning more than a decade. He's programmed for DOS, Windows, and Linux; builds his own PCs; and holds engineering degrees from MIT and Dartmouth, with an MBA from Cornell. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Pervasive Data Center topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right