• On The Insider: Pam Anderson - Snow Bunny
June 23, 2008 10:04 PM PDT

Firefox: checking for updates?

by Michael Horowitz

I happened upon a computer today that hadn't been used in a couple years and was running Firefox version 1.0.6. That version still had a single X on the far right side for closing tabs. It wasn't until later that each tab got its own little X.

Clicking on "Help -> Check For Updates" told me that the latest version was 1.0.12. Nothing about version 1.5, 2, or the just-released 3. Likewise, when Firefox 2 users check for updates, they are only told about the latest go-round for version 2, nothing about version 3.

In general, the way Firefox self-updates is very well done. This is born out in the stats below, an excerpt from a website activity report showing, for this month, how many hits the site experienced from people using Firefox version 2.x. As you can see, the vast amount of Firefox 2 users are using the latest edition, 2.0.0.14.


Is the failure to look up the version ladder a bug or a conscious design decision? Either way, there are, no doubt, computer users that never got the memo, people still running Firefox version 1.0.12 or 1.5.x, thinking they have the latest and greatest.

Self-updating Firefox from version 2 to version 3 now, would be a mistake. While a new version is new, the decision to upgrade should not be automated. However, at some point Mozilla will stop maintaining version 2, a condition techies refer to as "end of life". Here's hoping that when version 2 hits EOL (the mandatory TLA) that the update checking is a bit more self-aware.

Update June 26, 2008: According an article today at arstechnica, "...Mozilla told us that they have not finalized the schedule for when Firefox 3 will be made available to Firefox 2 users through the update channel, but they suspect that it will happen within the next two or three months."

See a summary of all my Defensive Computing postings.

Michael Horowitz is an independent computer consultant and the author of several classes on Defensive Computing. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Defensive Computing
Fixing bugs in the Flash Player yet again
Getting more battery power for your computer
Get an MSI Wind Netbook for only $349
Not interested in a Netbook computer? Consider the Honda Fit
Beware emails linking to blogspot.com
When Word documents break
More about printer ink rip-offs
Some computers are too important to be networked
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by john55440 June 24, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
IMHO, FF2 "Check For Updates" should present FF3 as an Optional Update. Currently, it doesn't.
Reply to this comment
by asadotzler June 25, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
Michael, our update mechanism has two distinct types of updates, "minor" updates for security and stability fixes that are automatic and pretty aggressive, and "major updates" for new feature versions that are not as automatic or aggressive until the previous major version is EOLed.

Firefox 1.0 had some pretty serious issues with updating that were fixed by the time we shipped Firefox 1.5 so it wasn't until 1.5 that Firefox could make the "major" updates correctly. You just won't get it in Firefox 1.0.x, and fortunately, the number of people on Firefox 1.0.x is exceedingly tiny.

Firefox 1.5.x users were given minor automatic updates until Firefox 2 had been available for a bit more than 6 months (Mozilla supports older versions with security and stability updates for at least 6 months after the new major feature version ships.) During that time, Firefox 1.5.x users also received several major update notifications urging them to move to Firefox 2, but not until Firefox 2 had received a couple of "minor updates".

Firefox 2.0x users won't receive the major update push until some time after we've shipped our first minor update to Firefox 3 and Firefox 2.0.x users will continue to get stability and security minor updates regularly until about six months from now.

This is good for two things: One, it gives us a chance to fix any issues that we didn't discover with our two million beta testers (there are almost always one or two edge case bugs that you don't discover until you have tens of millions of users.) Two, it gives the add-ons community a couple of months to get all of their add-ons updated and well tested in Firefox 3 before we start "pushing" people into Firefox 3 via automatic updates.

In the mean time, if you want to update to Firefox 3, it's just a download away at http://www.mozilla.com

- A
Reply to this comment
by mhinnewyork June 26, 2008 8:32 AM PDT
Please contact me at michaelhorowitz at gmail so that I confirm your identity. Thanks. Michael Horowitz
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About Defensive Computing

Michael Horowitz is an independent computer consultant and the author of several classes on Defensive Computing. He views Defensive Computing as taking steps, when things are running well, to avoid or minimize the inevitable problems down the road. It's about educating yourself to the level where you can make your own intelligent decisions about keeping your computers and data happy and healthy. If you depend on computers, yet are on your own, without an IT department or nearby nerd, this blog's for you. His personal web site is michaelhorowitz.com.

He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Defensive Computing topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right