No restore point for you
Once upon a time I sat down to write a blog posting. While waiting for Windows XP to boot up, the System Restore icon on the desktop caught my eye.
I suggested making a desktop icon for System Restore back in July when I offered Four tips to using System Restore on Windows XP. In this case, the icon served as a visual reminder that I hadn't checked up on System Restore in a while.
System Restore is a feature of Windows XP* that periodically backs up the registry and other system files that Microsoft considers critical. Each backup is called a Restore Point. Whenever something goes wrong, with either Windows or an application, restoring the system to a Restore Point when everything was working well, should probably be your knee-jerk debugging reaction.
The problem with System Restore is that it's a miserably designed application, one that could only be produced by a company with no competition in the marketplace. You need to periodically check up on it because it both breaks and turns itself off and in neither case does Windows XP tell you that anything is wrong (you can't make this stuff up).
So, while XP was in the final stages of booting, I clicked on the System Restore icon and then chose to "Restore my computer to an earlier time," which is the only way to check the inventory of Restore Points.
As shown above, there were no Restore Points. None. Nada Zilch.
The System Properties (see above) showed that Windows was indeed monitoring the C disk (which in English means that it should be making Restore Points). It had 399 megabytes of hard disk space allocated to System Restore, well above the 200 megabyte minimum. There were no errors on the event logs.
Why no Restore Points? Beats me. Fortunately, I was able to make one.
Help System Restore help you. Every couple weeks or so make sure it's still making Restore Points.
*System Restore also exists in Windows ME and Vista, but not in Windows 2000.
See a summary of all my Defensive Computing postings.
Michael Horowitz is an independent computer consultant and the author of several classes on Defensive Computing. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. 



My bottom line: there's still no substitute for a regular full system backup.
Leo
http://ask-leo.com
Needless to say, I agree completely that there is no substitute for a regular disk image backup. But making one is beyond the abilities of many computer users.
koyophoto: GoBack has it's proponents, but I'm not one. It can indeed be very useful and is a huge step up from System Restore. But, a while back I read the manual (such as it is, brochure is probably a more accurate term) cover to cover and there are many gotchas with GoBack. That is, it interferes with a number of things and you always have to be aware of it's interference. For example, recently a disk image backup program refused to run because it detected the presence of GoBack. And if you are editing large files or making database updates, you probably need to turn it off beforehand.
john55440: Not sure what you mean by offline backup software. File backups or
disk image backups? As for Norton Ghost, I used a couple versions of the software (though not v12) and that was more than enough. I will not use it ever again.
Michael Horowitz
- by ezsurfer January 7, 2008 6:08 AM PST
- Add one more to the list of Gotcha's with system Restore. Recently lost a laptop motherboard. When returned, system restore cannot function. Not sure exactly why, but it no longer recognizes the laptop as the same computer. And since when did a motherboard replacement delete the entire hard drive?
- Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)Welcome to Windows "Vista". So, since the computer came backas the originally as purchased XP, that is the way it shall stay.
On the backup front, HP now makes a Home Server. Looks like my kind of idea. Hardware to do what you can't afford not to be done right.
Clif