May 21, 2008 4:38 PM PDT

Napster MP3 store: great selection, bad interface

by Matt Rosoff
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

Napster launched its Web-based MP3 download store yesterday, and it seems to be the latest digital music whipping boy, with negative reviews in several places.

Let me start with the positives. Napster claims the store has 6 million tracks, which is 50% larger than any other MP3 store out there. They do have a single download of "The Promise" by When in Rome, an obscure 1980s single my wife loves but that iTunes will only let you buy as part of the full Napoleon Dynamite soundtrack. I'm sorry, Apple, but I won't pay more than $0.99 to get that song.

Two album results...but we won't show them to you.

(Credit: Screenshot)

And of course it must be mentioned that every song on Napster's MP3 store is DRM-free, meaning it can be transferred to an unlimited number of computers and devices and will play in just about every music software program known to humankind.

But I'm afraid that Napster still falls short in interface design--a longtime complaint I've had with the company.

Oddly, the Napster home page still features the subscription service far more prominently than the MP3 store, even though the store launched today and will presumably be attracting a lot of onlookers.

When you do find the store, you'll probably recognize it: it looks an awful lot like iTunes rendered within a browser. Which would be fine if it worked as well as iTunes. Unfortunately, there are a few gaps. First, if you have Firefox pop-up blocking enabled, you have to turn it off. Second, when you get a list of search results, they seem to be listed in a random order, making it hard to find a particular item. (Perhaps they're listed by popularity? It doesn't say.) You can arrange them alphabetically, but it takes some hunting and clicking--some of the headers are clickable, some aren't.

Then, there are just some general bugs. For example, when I searched for the new Nick Cave album, Dig, Lazarus, Dig, I got a green bar showing me that two album results were available...but the screen for the results was strangely blank. (See the screenshot.) Huh? Another glitch: when I conducted a new search, sometimes it ignored the changed search terms and re-ran the previous search.

I also ran into the "this MP3 is not available" debacle that this Ars Technica reviewer describes--in this case, it was for a Pink Floyd album I was particularly excited about downloading, an obscure 2005 re-release of two songs from a 1968 movie called Tonight Let's All Make Love in London. But although the album showed up in my search results with a little "MP3" tag next to them, the MP3s aren't actually available for purchase. Insane.

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995, and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mattrosoff.
Recent posts from Digital Noise: Music and Tech
Muziic Web app offers Vevo without ads
10 music-tech trends that will shape the next decade
The five biggest digital audio duds of 2009
Fantastic DJ app for iPhone stung by piracy
The five most welcome digital audio products of 2009
Star 6 beat-box app for iPhone improved
Vevo CEO confirms it's all about business
Vevo--a music site we didn't need
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by iancull May 21, 2008 5:26 PM PDT
Doesn't support Safari at all!
Reply to this comment
by gsmiller88 May 22, 2008 10:18 AM PDT
Typical. I'm surprised Mac users are even able to download. At least it supports Firefox for Mac, and not just Internet Explorer and Navigator, like a website I visited last week.
by wyly295 May 21, 2008 7:05 PM PDT
Bash away. I subscribe and love it.
Reply to this comment
by Viper007Bond May 21, 2008 11:34 PM PDT
A bitmap for your screenshot? You should know better. ;)
Reply to this comment
by celticbrewer May 22, 2008 5:04 AM PDT
High five, Viper. I find it hard to respect anyone's technical review when they post a bitmap on a webpage.

As for Napster, I'd be willing to give it a try. None of the negatives posted here really concern me. I'd consider amazon, too. I do know one thing- I'd never buy anything from Apple.
Reply to this comment
by gsmiller88 May 22, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
Maybe someday you will see the light.
by Fractalight May 22, 2008 5:29 AM PDT
I'm a subscriber and since this new version was released, when I open the Napster Player up it forces me to download the latest player. No probelm right?... Wrong... I download the latest player and have it run the .exe and the set up crashes. Of course I've put in a help request... over 24 hours ago. I love what Napster is, but I just don't like dealing with their "help." They shouldn't force the subscriber to update their player.
Reply to this comment
by stateofdesign June 5, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
Fractalight, I'm having the same problem. What did you have to do to fix it? Thanks.
by rabhairt May 23, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
Really? That's all you've got? You hit a weird search result and you can't find a deep track re-release from Pink Floyd?

It's official, you get a "dude, seriously" for this review...
Reply to this comment
by MattRosoff May 23, 2008 11:05 AM PDT
In an MP3 store with 6 million songs, search is everything. Inaccurate search results waste my time. And my point wasn't that it didn't have an obscure re-release from Pink Floyd. My point was that it appeared in the search results with a little "MP3" bug...but if you click on that bug, you find out that the MP3s aren't actually available. That's just idiotic and misleading. But you're welcome to check it out for yourself, that's why I posted the links.
by Musicvoid June 2, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
The time old problem and here it is again. Great selection of tunes but lousy interface. That is what has kept apple, iTunes and the iPod ahead of the competition and it will continue to do so until digital music retailers both online and mobile build consumer friendly interfaces. What they need is for the apps to have intuitive UIs which are fun to use not a pain.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Digital Noise: Music and Tech

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995 and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He's also a bass guitarist and an avid collector (and digitizer) of LP records. DISCLAIMER: This blog contains the personal opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinions of his employers or of CNET Networks. As an IT industry analyst, the author occasionally agrees to nondisclosure agreements from Microsoft or other companies, and he will not violate the terms of such agreements on this blog.

He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Noise: Music and Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right