Selling live recordings at shows
Pollstar magazine asks a good question: why aren't more artists recording their live concerts to CD and selling them at shows? I recall that the Pixies recorded most of the shows on their reunion tour in 2004, but I haven't seen many bands do it since.
Pollstar notes that some venues retain the rights to sell anything recorded there, while others charge artists a fee for the privilege of recording their own shows for resale later. (Fair enough--the venue has probably invested heavily in sound gear, or at the very least in acoustics, which may have an effect on the final product.) Copyright issues surrounding co-written songs and label/publisher ownership can also be an issue.
But another reason is technology: rigs that can burn lots of CDs simultaneously cost several thousand dollars, and the artist has to haul this gear as well as blank CDs and jewelcases around. One possible answer is memory sticks. They're more expensive per unit than blank CDs, but they're smaller, file-transfer is faster, and they don't require dedicated equipment--just a computer, which you're probably already using to record the show.
At least one high profile artist is already doing this. Last summer, I spoke to Seattle P-I reporter Todd Bishop (who maintains an excellent blog on Microsoft) right after he got back from seeing Willie Nelson. Willie was selling USB wristbands of the day's concert for $25 a pop at the show--in fact, you can still buy them through his Web site. Trent Reznor also made some very creative use of memory sticks to promote Nine Inch Nails' last record, and given his recent split with his label, I wouldn't be surprised if he starts selling music this way as well.
Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995, and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network. Disclosure.





In addition, AVI conversion supports all kinds of encoders, including DivX and XviD. WMV conversion allows different conversion qualities, including normal, online, PDA, and user defined. It also supports formats for iPod, PSP, MPEG4-DVD, and other MP4 players or portable devices.What else? Burning DVD, Adding your own translucent logo to video frames, and many much more.
Yes, no doubt. ALL-IN-ONE! For such a little cost, now you can enjoy the excellent performance of this super multimedia conversion tool.
I go to bt.eTree.org to get my concerts dowloaded after the show instead of waiting at the venue for 2 or 3 disks.
Disks are so old school anyway. If you could get it on a SD card say 4 gig. That would be better.
The only reason most people (i.e., not the top 1% of fanatics) want an "on-the-spot" live recording is the exact same reason they want a t-shirt: to show others they were there.
Hardly a good reason for a band to release a mediocre-fi recording of an average show.
I agree with some other posters that downloads are attractive because they don't require you to wait in line, but there's a spontanaeity right after a great show that fades away after a few hours. I'd personally be more likely to pay right away.
- Downloads = no overhead
-
by daveturnley
October 30, 2007 11:30 AM PDT
- Pearl Jam released recordings of every show on one of their tours five years or so ago (on old-fashioned CDs). The idea of capturing the show you've just seen is cool, though I wouldn't want to pay in advance (in case the show blows). And I wouldn't want to wait in line afterward.
-
Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)The obvious answer is that bands should just upload the shows right after they end. Fans can then go home and download, and fans elsewhere can collect the whole tour. Charge a low price (like $3 each) and watch the people eat it up.
A band like Radiohead (sorry, but aren't they required to be mentioned on music blogs for at least another month?)--with their rabid fan-base--could make some nice cash.