• On The Insider: The Biggest Celeb Scandal of 09
August 23, 2007 11:58 AM PDT

Who decides what's "classic rock"?

by Matt Rosoff
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 14 comments

In Seattle, there's a classic rock station, KZOK, that's been around forever. It was already old when I discovered it in junior high school in the early 1980s, and of all the music stations in Seattle, it's the only one that still has exactly the same format. I mean, the playlist yesterday is exactly the same as the playlist in 1982, although they might stick in a song by an artist that used to be known as "new wave" (U2, Talking Heads, Pretenders), or a band that didn't exist in 1982 (Guns and Roses), and there's probably a little bit less of the 70s guitar stalwarts like Robin Trower or Montrose (but only a little less!). It's still preset on my car radio for those rare times when I'm stuck without my iPod or Zune and am sick of listening to NPR and my usual college/indie radio station.

But one of the things that's always bugged me about "classic rock" radio--and this isn't to pick on KZOK, they're using a format that's common across the U.S.--is the definition of the word "classic." On one hand, it's obviously a marketing tactic--classic rock is music that was popular on FM rock radio in the 70s, and other songs that could appeal to the people who listened those stations--I'm guessing mostly white males born in the 50s. But there's always that song or that artist that makes you wonder "how did this make the cut?" Musical taste is subjective, but how many people get excited whenever, say, a Bob Seger tune comes on the radio? I mean, he sort of rocked back in the day, but do people still really love him? Do people ever come home from a hard day at work and grab a beer and put on Bob Seger? A whole album? All the way through? If not, then why is he still played on classic rock radio in such heavy rotation?

A couple of days ago, the Digital Audio Insider blog did an interesting thing with numbers from Internet radio service Last.fm. For each artist, that service shows how many individuals have listened to the station featuring that artist, and the total number of songs by that artist that have been played by all listeners. If you divide songs by listeners, you get the average number of songs each listener has played for each artist. This gives you a very rough measure of listener devotion to particular artists.

Of course the technique is flawed. It only measures a very particular audience: computer users who listen to this particular music service on their computers. Artists with deeper catalogs should tend to have higher numbers than artists with only an album or two. And artists with really long songs might have lower numbers than those with short songs.

Nonetheless, the results on Digital Audio Insider contained some interesting tidbits. For example, I listen to a lot of bands in a genre that some call "post rock." (Horrible term, but I use it for lack of a better one...it basically means long, heavily amplified, mostly instrumental songs played by fairly large ensembles, with lots of big building dynamics...sort of a poor man's classical music played by ex-metalheads or -punks, I suppose.) Within this genre, fans of Explosions in the Sky, Sigur Ros, and Mogwai apparently listen to lots of songs by these bands--their averages are all in the 30s. But Godspeed You Black Emperor, who practically invented the genre, has a much lower average--down in the 20s.

I really like Godspeed. But come to think of it, I often skip their songs when they come up on random shuffle. I like to think it's because they're too long, too heavy, and demand too much attention. Or that they're only listenable in the context of a complete album. But then again, Sigur Ros has many of the same qualities, and I always listen when they show up. So maybe I don't like Godspeed as much as I thought I did.

Digital Audio Insider's chart focused on newer indie-rock artists, with The Beatles as the control group. But that got me thinking about classic rock radio, so I did my own measurements.

Pink Floyd came out way at the top of the list, with 49.27 plays per listener (athough still way short of The Beatles' 64.48). This was somewhat gratifying, as I'm a big fan...then again, I guess I just fit right into Last.fm's target demographic. Bob Dylan (34.14) and Led Zeppelin (32.36) were in the 30s, which isn't surprising given their lasting influence and breadth of audience, and Rush also scored high (33.68), which shouldn't be a surprise to anybody who's ever met a hardcore Rush fan. Then again, the Grateful Dead have similarly hardcore fans, but they were much lower at 24.71.

Queen surprised me with a 27.59. Other relatively high scorers included U2 (26.76), David Bowie (26.29), and AC/DC (24.99). The Stones (22.27) and The Who (20.41) scored surprisingly low, given their breadth of influence and prominence on classic rock radio.

But guess who was at the very bottom of the list--below power-pop like Van Halen (15.85) and Journey (13.78), below quintessential 80s pop bands like Talking Heads (17.13) and The Police (13.36), even below my other favorite "why do they play this band?" band, Bad Company (8.52)...Bob Seger. On average, his listeners played only 7.89 of his songs on Last.fm.

(Sorry to pick on Bob Seger, but it had to be someone. He's just the one that always sticks out to me. For the record, I still kind of sort of like his songs "Katmandu" and "Get Out Of Denver," the latter of which contains the great line "cause you look just like a commie and you might just be a member.")

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995, and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mattrosoff.
Recent posts from Digital Noise: Music and Tech
Rank your favorite songs with Rank'em
Muziic Web app offers Vevo without ads
10 music-tech trends that will shape the next decade
The five biggest digital audio duds of 2009
Fantastic DJ app for iPhone stung by piracy
The five most welcome digital audio products of 2009
Star 6 beat-box app for iPhone improved
Vevo CEO confirms it's all about business
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Segar is OK
by TonyV1963 August 24, 2007 10:09 AM PDT
Bob Segar had a selection of good rock tunes in his time. Hollywood Lights, Turn the Page, Night Moves are three of my favorites (meaning I'd turn the volume up rather than switching the station). He might be a B list rocker, but I'd say he qualifies to be played on a classic rock radio station.

What I want to know is who decided Billy Squire is classic rock?
Reply to this comment
seger/squire
by konstantinshark August 24, 2007 2:00 PM PDT
When you hear Turn the Page once or twice daily for last 20-25 years, you might... mmm... want to turn the page (as in, change the channel).

Billy Squire's songs? They get annoying rather faster. Billy Squire = classic? Neh!!! Classic of what? Classic of power-pop-barroom-background music? Quite possibly. But still Nahh!!!

Cheers.
You are right.
by MattRosoff August 24, 2007 10:49 AM PDT
True, Bob Seger > Billy Squier.

I'm sure we can all think of other examples. But Bob stuck out to me because (1) that "Old Time Rock and Roll" song is the most overplayed song ever and (2) I got really sick of hearing him singing for Chevy every 10 minutes on NFL Sunday.
Reply to this comment
Classic Rock: 1965-1980
by QMT August 24, 2007 3:24 PM PDT
Rubber Soul to the death of John Lennon. Seems fairly straightforeward.
Reply to this comment
1965-1980?
by MattRosoff August 25, 2007 8:40 AM PDT
So is Funkadelic classic rock? What about the Sex Pistols?
Reply to this comment
A world going to hell...
by wango2007 August 25, 2007 8:51 AM PDT
... and you're debating what is classic rock and what is not.

This question seems soooooooo shallow.
Reply to this comment
Power Pop?
by rodrigodosreis August 27, 2007 4:23 AM PDT
Van Halen? Power Pop? If you're refering to the Sammy Hagar days, maybe ok I
guess, but otherwise it's just like calling Led Zeppelin Adult Contemporary
Reply to this comment
remember when they were called AOR?
by moon_brain August 27, 2007 8:31 AM PDT
Album Oriented Rock

Read "FM" by Richard Neer, the former NYC Rock Jock. It's a great book that explains the death of DJ and listener driven commercial rock radio and the rise of consultants and further restrictive playlists. Corporate radio killed the goose that laid the golden egg.

They used to be able to play rock artists old and new, "new wave" or 60's hippie, urban-sound or southern rock, etc..
Now they can only play a limited amount of old stuff with almost no deep cuts. Remember whole album sides? Yeah - maybe you'll get that 2am on a Sunday or something. Probably...not.
Reply to this comment
radio and van halen
by MattRosoff August 27, 2007 9:37 AM PDT
FM: thanks for the recommendation. I remember that another local AOR hard rock station, KISW (now all-metal) played Roger Waters' Radio KAOS in its entirety in the middle of the day. And they used to do some really amazing segues between songs that suggested the DJ was actually designing the playlist on the fly. The fact that the corporates didn't think we listeners would see through the shift.

Van Halen: yes, I was talking about the Hagar years.
Reply to this comment
My Question:
by grissomb August 27, 2007 12:32 PM PDT
My Question is more of Oldies. When does something get termed "Oldies."

Sooner than you think.

I'm 25 and I don't like a lot of newer music. I like a bit of Ryan Adams and Michael Buble, however then I kinda of skip back to Guns n Roses and anyone prior. Love the "classic" bands like Eagles, Zep, Beatles, Dylan... anyway....

Talked to a friend of mine- she's 20. She constantly refers to anything before 1990 as oldies. Guns n Roses was oldies. Huey Lewis was oldies. And she hated it. Staind is her all-time favorite band. Staind. Ya we don't talk much anymore.

But how long will it be before you turn on an "oldies" station, expecting 50s and 60s music- but instead get Tupac and Biggie?

Those days are coming, and they scare me.
Reply to this comment
when do you stop listening to new music?
by boopiejones August 27, 2007 3:52 PM PDT
ever noticed how your parents and older friends/coworkers don't listen to new music that is being produced? i always wondered when i would stop enjoying new music that is coming out. well, at age 30, i can honestly say that i think the time has come (or at least is fast approaching). on my way home from work i find myself flipping through the radio only to stop at "oldies" stations (i'm defining oldies as anything not produced within the last 5 or so years). it is extremely rare, maybe about once every three or four months, that i say "ohhh, never heard this song before - i like it!"
Reply to this comment
still listening to new music
by MattRosoff August 28, 2007 9:23 AM PDT
I'm 37 and I still seek out and listen to new music, although it goes in waves...sometimes I'll go months without discovering anything I like, then get into a whole bunch of new stuff. I am more easily bored with simple pop and rock than I used to be, and can't figure out what all the indie kids see in the power-pop and garage punk bands that are so big in Seattle now, so I guess I do recognize my age in that way.
by Zak70smith June 24, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
find everything you want at http://megaupload.name
Reply to this comment
by Markking08 May 2, 2009 10:46 PM PDT
classical rock like the riff
was made by a symphony orchestra
a sand bucket of particles the classical orchestra
has been reduced to fewer rock pieces of instruments
hence classical rock

no ******' sex pistols nor rolling stones nor the beatles is NOT

THE WHO, QUEEN, DEEP PURPLE, LED ZEP, BLACK SABBATH ARE THE ONLY UK CLASSICAL ROCK
USA? PUT KANSAS ...???
CLASSICAL ROCK IS MAINY AND ENGLAND THING

VERY FEW ROCK BANDS QUALIFY CLASSICAL ROCK
YOU HAVE TO DRAW A PARALLEL IN THE RIFF
WITH BEETHOVEN STYLE CLASSICAL MUSIC
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.

About Digital Noise: Music and Tech

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995 and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He's also a bass guitarist and an avid collector (and digitizer) of LP records. DISCLAIMER: This blog contains the personal opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinions of his employers or of CNET Networks. As an IT industry analyst, the author occasionally agrees to nondisclosure agreements from Microsoft or other companies, and he will not violate the terms of such agreements on this blog.

He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Noise: Music and Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right