• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
May 27, 2009 11:50 AM PDT

Zune HD will be a music player, not a super-device

by Matt Rosoff

After months of increasingly wild rumors, CNET's Ina Fried got the official scoop yesterday: Microsoft is indeed releasing the Zune HD this fall. The device will feature an OLED touch screen, high-definition video output (with an optional add-on), a version of Internet Explorer (it sounds similar to the version planned for Windows Mobile 6.5, which uses the core IE6 engine but adds Flash support, as well as some technology from IE8 to better support JavaScript), and HD Radio.

(Credit: Microsoft)

I spoke to the Zune marketing team this morning, and they didn't have much to say beyond those points. In fact, they weren't originally planning on saying anything until later this summer, but felt they needed to set expectations for Zune customers in light of all the rumors.

Here's why: the Zune HD isn't going to be the super-device that some geeks had been hoping for. It will play games--just like today's Zunes, which ship with a couple simple games--but it won't be a full-fledged gaming device like the Sony PlayStation Portable or Nintendo DS. It won't have its own application store, although Microsoft hinted it might connect to the forthcoming Windows Marketplace for Mobile, which could let third-party apps like Facebook and Pandora find a home on the device. It won't feature WiMax connectivity, although that might be planned for a future touch-screen phone with a similar form factor.

In other words, this is Zune 3.0, a music-focused device with a nice touch screen. It'll support video and apps, sure, but the team is focusing on improving the music-playback experience--think album art, more detailed artist pages with images, perhaps lyrics or video content.

Will these features be enough to get users to choose a Zune HD instead of an iPod Touch? The main difference seems to be HD Radio. I believe Microsoft when they say FM radio is the Zune's second-most important selling point, but Zune users are a very small portion of the overall MP3 player market--the tens of millions of users who bought an iPod didn't care about radio. There may be some other killer features we don't yet know about, and there's always the Zune Pass to consider--a great deal at $14.99 a month for unlimited streams and 10 permanent downloads--but I think the uphill battle against Apple will continue.

As far as the other half of the news goes, it's been clear for some time that Microsoft was getting ready to integrate the Zune Marketplace into Xbox Live. The company will have more details to show off next week at E3, so I'll save further comment until I see what they've got.

Follow Matt on Twitter

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995, and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mattrosoff.
Recent posts from Digital Noise: Music and Tech
EMI to offer instant concert recordings
Beatles copyright case down a legal rabbit hole
Study: Radio still has broadest reach
Lala co-founder discusses Google deal, iPhone app
Google brings online music to the masses
SongVoo controls iPhone music with simple gestures
JukeFly turns your PC into music-streaming device
Songite offers instant gratification for single songs
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (99 Comments)
by geotopia May 27, 2009 12:24 PM PDT
Wow, are they still making Zunes?
Reply to this comment
by sunnyhours May 27, 2009 12:29 PM PDT
I had the same reaction. I honestly had no idea the Zune was still around. Too funny...
by jabberwolf May 27, 2009 2:07 PM PDT
Yeah its taken marketshare of the MP3 player market faster and in greater amount than Apple's OSX has of the OS market in 8 years.

Imagine that, and still the Appletards think that Apple is so great, forgetting that it was Apple that introduced DRM to the music industry and allowed only their music from their site to be played on their devices.

Yeah there have been much better and liberal alternatives to the average sheep's ipod!
by slapppy May 27, 2009 2:17 PM PDT
Why not? They have enough money from their Windows monopoly to keep losing millions and millions for years. Eventually they will catch up.
by DrtyDogg May 27, 2009 3:04 PM PDT
slapppy how many millions has the Zune lost Microsoft?
by Dalmatian28 May 27, 2009 3:51 PM PDT
haha....Microsoft this, Microsoft that, "they are losers that can't do anything right" (according to most blogs) yet it seems that financially, Microsoft is still doing way better than most others! I hate to burst your bobble but last time I checked Microsoft was profitably selling most of its products including Zune. I like freedom that Microsoft gives you with most of its products....can you imagine Apple with their share of the PC market. I am confident that it would be something like this...you can install application on on this computer only if it is made by Apple, hey stup*d, pay up for the player...what you want it for free, ooo you want to play iTuens where???_ NOOOO, that is NOT made by Apple, You want to install third party hardware where???_ nooo, I tell you what you can install on your computer, you want overclock what?_ I will tell you what is the best speed for you!!! Do I need to continue??? See Microsoft is NOT so bad when you consider what would be like with out it!!!! I just think that Microsoft is better of the two evil...
by Random_Walk May 27, 2009 4:13 PM PDT
"Apple that introduced DRM to the music industry"

Really?

"In 2002, Bertelsmann (comprising BMG, Arista, and RCA) was the first corporation to use DRM on audio CDs.[citation needed] In 2005, Sony BMG introduced new DRM technology which installed DRM software on users' computers without clearly notifying the user or requiring confirmation. Among other things, the installed software included a rootkit, which created a severe security vulnerability others could exploit. When the nature of the DRM involved was made public much later, Sony initially minimized the significance of the vulnerabilities its software had created, but was eventually compelled to recall millions of CDs, and released several attempts to patch the surreptitiously included software to at least remove the rootkit. Several class action lawsuits were filed, which were ultimately settled by agreements to provide affected consumers with a cash payout or album downloads free of DRM."

ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management#DRM_and_music

Clue: the iTunes Music Store didn't exist in 2002, genius.
by AlfredFrances May 27, 2009 5:53 PM PDT
Apple is an investor's wet dream
by TheDiplomat78 May 28, 2009 10:07 AM PDT
Team Xbox stated that anonymous yet reliable sources informed them that a digital entertainment handheld device, which is termed as ?xYz? for the moment, is in the final design stages of the making.</strong> Well, the ?Y? acts as a bridge to unite ?X? (xbox 360) and ?Z? (Zune) for a completely new platform of entertainment, wherein users can enjoy both gaming and media playback. The system is also said to offer Internet-related services and sadly doesn?t provide access to a phone network.

The sources claim that the device could possibly be unlike anything in the market today. The ?xYz? device is believed to give competition to Apple, Sony, Nintendo and even Google.
by NervClaX May 29, 2009 5:53 AM PDT
Yes, just as they are still making XBoxes. And they'll keep pounding away at Apple, Sony, Google, and anyone else who gets in their way with their near-limitless resources. Few companies can afford to compete the way Microsoft can.

And what's this about the Zune HD not being a "super-device." I WANT super-device. Give me super-device!
by SeizeCTRL May 29, 2009 1:34 PM PDT
I would imagine if it wasn't for the iPod and iTunes, Apple would be in a dark grim whole right about now. The iPod saved Apple from doom.
See more comment replies
by oorfenegro May 27, 2009 12:35 PM PDT
Once again Microsoft is behind the 8 ball. There are several apps for IPhone-Itouch that will play streaming radio. Who cares about hi def radio?
Reply to this comment
by ibeetle May 27, 2009 12:52 PM PDT
I was thinking the same thing. ClearChanel terrestrial commercial radio is still commercial radio. 2 songs an hour by singers you never heard of or never want to hear from again. Only this time it is in HD audio.

Seriously though I have heard HD radio. In the NYC area there are several and yet only 2 have gotten right. Look at the HD radio map. It is great if you live in NYC or LA or another major market. Live in a secondary market or smaller (about 60% of the country) and you are screwed.

I can see Zune owners laughing at iPod Touch owners saying I have a HD radio... of course there is no HD radio stations around, but I do have one.

It is nothing but a bullet point for the sales staff at Best Buy. We have a HD radio... what do you have? SiriusXM, Pandora? Live365? At lease ours is buit-in. With the iPod/iPhone you have to download it.
by DrtyDogg May 27, 2009 3:15 PM PDT
With the current Zunes you can stream straight from the Zune marketplace, how are they behind again?
by Random_Walk May 27, 2009 4:16 PM PDT
@Dogg: can it stream off the Internet (e.g. Pandora)?

(hint: Pandora costs $0.00)
by monkeyfun14 May 27, 2009 6:16 PM PDT
@Random_Walk

With a full browser and app support im sure it will be able to.

What kills me is that everyone is like well iPod Touch has more Apps well no ****? This product isn't even released yet.
by DrtyDogg May 28, 2009 3:08 AM PDT
@Random_Walk: We'll see in a couple of months.
by Random_Walk May 28, 2009 6:51 AM PDT
...so in other words, the "current Zunes" cannot.
by Rod Roddy May 28, 2009 8:29 PM PDT
Whats really funny is all the Appleheads that can hear the Zune HD right at there heels and all they can do is volley WEAK insults at the Zune. Microsoft has been slowly but surely chipping away at the Apple behemoth that is the ipod since 2006. Apple has had it's head too far up its arse building an "app" store and forgetting that the ipod was first and foremost a music player--hence the inferior sound quality as opposed to the Zune. Oh yeah, all you haters, that Xbox 360 your playing...yeah, that's not Apple :)
by DigitalAngelic May 29, 2009 5:18 AM PDT
No, Random, the current Zunes cannot. But neither can the iPod Classic or Nano, the current Zunes' competitors, so... what's your point?
by Justin8888 May 27, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
It wont even be a music player
Reply to this comment
by BLSCPTS May 27, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
Funny! My Zune plays music just fine.
I can't compare it to a iPod as I've never had an opportunity to play with one. The radio comes in quite handy at the gym as the TV's broadcast their audio over the FM range.

I look forward to checking out the Zune HD. :)
by shinji257 May 28, 2009 8:14 AM PDT
It says right in the article that their focus is improving the music experience. Their focus will always be on music.
by Spartan_458 May 30, 2009 5:57 PM PDT
Your face won't even be a music player!


That's the level of fail on your statment.
by 4dthinker May 27, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
The ZuneHD looks to be the offspring of a CowonS9/SamsungP3/iriverSPINN/ipodTOUCH mating. WiFi. Multitouch and the accelerometer give it the same gaming/App potential as the iPod Touch. The OLED screen isn't for music playback. Battery life could be amazing (the S9 gets 50+ music hours / 11 video hourse on a charge). It could be pretty amazing.

Yet the Korean players all have record-from FM, voice recording, and bluetooth for wireless headphones. No mention of a microphone on the zuneHD, and your option will be to BUY songs you hear on the radio instead of simply recording them. They'll have to make WiFi as amazing as what it's used for on the TOUCH, or spice the ZuneHD $50 or so less than similar memoried models.
Reply to this comment
by shinji257 May 28, 2009 8:16 AM PDT
Of course the oled screen isn't for music. It is for battery life. oled screens use alot less battery life and have a more vibrant display than current technology.
by 4dthinker May 27, 2009 12:56 PM PDT
And there is no reason to assume the ZuneHD can't listen to web radio.
Reply to this comment
by tlt112770 May 27, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
If this is not an uber device that at the very least connects with live services in the cloud they have already lost. The current zunes are excellent music players and video players. A device that is again just a music and video player will not move the dial for micorsoft. Game over.
Signed ,
Zune 30 user with no reason to upgrade
Reply to this comment
by shinji257 May 28, 2009 8:17 AM PDT
I just got a 30gb zune from ebay. I didn't see a significant difference between the older and newer models.
by DigitalAngelic May 29, 2009 5:20 AM PDT
You have no reason to upgrade because Microsoft has given you all the new features for FREE. :P
by ibclc2 May 27, 2009 1:35 PM PDT
I have an iPod Touch with ooTunes installed, a radio application that gives me tons of stations from around the world, including stations from my XM subscription. Why do I need HD radio on a Zune??
Reply to this comment
by jabberwolf May 27, 2009 2:08 PM PDT
Because zune hd radio allows you to save 10 songs a month for using it. so you can listen to those tunes anytime and indefinitely.
by Delfairen May 27, 2009 2:44 PM PDT
HD radio works without wi-fi how does your ipod touch do for radio without wi-fi?
by terminalblue May 27, 2009 2:01 PM PDT
actually this is exactly the device most "geeks" were speculating. Anyone grounded in reality knows that wimax is out of the question, and its the same way with the app store...KIND OF...

the system will be Windows CE based with Xbox live functionality...so most likely, it will EVENTUALLY work with XNA based games. It must have at leat a 500mhz (my guess is about 700mhz )processor for the realtime encoding/reencoding of HD video (something that no current generation of ipod can do). And honestly, with a real web browser, the need for an "app store" is ridiculous. (BTW, the app store is just an excuse to make apple's closed architecture seem open.)

i dont think that anyone is expecting this device to be a netbook alternative, but it is a competitent competitor for the Ipod touch. personally, this is far more appealing of a device then anything apple has produced

Signed,
dissapointed ipod touch user always looking for something better
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor May 29, 2009 7:34 AM PDT
Terminalblue, I'm curious, because I've always been so happy with my iPod Touch.

What disappointed you about it and what does this device have that the Touch didn't?
by terminalblue May 29, 2009 5:36 PM PDT
@myles

here are alot of thing that let me down with the touch, mostly the fact that it barely worked with any ipod accessories (no radio remote support?!). i hated how little you could actually do with it (this was pre-app store on a jail broken touch). the sound was terrible (compared to the zune at least) but it did have an EQ, which was a nice addition, but the hardware amp just couldnt keep up. the browser was very good, but its overall usefulness was lost on me because (at first) most website didnt work correctly.

I should specify that i was only dissapointed in the sense that i am an early adopter of alot of technolgies, and this simply didnt live up to the hype.

out of the box, the zunehd is offering all of the same ORIGINAL features of the touch PLUS the HD features and support for the zune software (which kind of makes itunes look primitive).

ALOT of people love the touch/iphone...but its pretty much just ok, feature wise.
by slapppy May 27, 2009 2:20 PM PDT
@jabberwolf

My gosh, your completely brainwashed. Jobs never wanted DRM and has always pushed for DRM free music.

http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg May 27, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
My gosh you're completely brainwashed. You believe everything the CEO of a company tells you.
by Pacu102 May 27, 2009 3:25 PM PDT
Wow... talking about brainwashed people while you give us an apple written article to prove your Jobs-is-actually-against-DRM point...
by slapppy May 27, 2009 3:28 PM PDT
Yep and both of you have done nothing to prove your point. Just a lot of hot air.
by DrtyDogg May 28, 2009 3:14 AM PDT
You haven't proven a thing either just a lot of hot air.

Here is something you might find interesting if you believe everything a company tells you:

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1997/nov97/dojpetpr.mspx

According to this Microsoft has never ileagally abused their monopoly.
by Random_Walk May 28, 2009 6:59 AM PDT
Err, y'all realize that slapppy is correct, right?

ref: http://news.cnet.com/2100-1027_3-6156763.html

'course, everyone misses the point: iTunes Music Store was the first commercial store to mainstream digital music, which in turn allowed them to push for an end to DRM, when other stores (especially the subscription ones) were happily pushing for tighter DRM restrictions.

Now to be perfectly fair, there was one music store out there that sold DRM-free tunes first... allofmp3.com, I believe the name was. Problem is, it was operating illegally and out of Russia, so it doesn't quite count...

BTW: I have never shopped at the iTunes Music Store, but I will give them credit where credit is due.
by shinji257 May 28, 2009 8:20 AM PDT
@slapppy: Their whole appstore is one big DRM dump. It used to be alot worse than it is now but still. You can't play those .m4p's on anything other than itunes or ipod/iphones. That is DRM in itself because it _restricts_ the music to their devices. Nothing else understands their DRM encryption. The non-DRM stuff? Oh it is .m4a. The player still has to understand it for portable devices. Can't play it on an XBox even if you wanted to.
by Random_Walk May 28, 2009 12:34 PM PDT
@shinji257:

"That is DRM in itself because it _restricts_ the music to their devices"

...then kindly explain the "burn to CD" feature that's built into iTunes.
by boy444 May 27, 2009 2:56 PM PDT
Wow, I want it so bad, but if I know microsft it will brake in three months for no reason and all I did was maybe use it three times. Tell me how much gb of memory it has. I hoe 120gb. Also, what the zune pass thing. Do i still get to have unlimited songs on my zune for $5 a month, I love the wifi download for songs saves a crap load. Also why are music player companies dumb, wifi is out kindle has 3g why can't they get 3g on these mp3 players.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 27, 2009 3:20 PM PDT
Actually

iPods have the highest failure rates of portable devices.

iPods have been criticized for their short life-span and fragile hard drives. A 2005 survey conducted on the MacInTouch website found that the iPod line had an average failure rate of 13.7% (although they note that comments from respondants indicate that "the true iPod failure rate may be lower than it appears"). It concluded that some models were more durable than others.[87] In particular, failure rates for iPods employing hard drives was usually above 20% while those with flash memory had a failure rate below 10%, indicating poor hard drive durability. In late 2005, many users complained that the surface of the first generation iPod Nano can become scratched easily, rendering the screen unusable.[88][89] A class action lawsuit was also filed.[90] Apple initially considered the issue a minor defect, but later began shipping these iPods with protective sleeves.
by shinji257 May 28, 2009 8:21 AM PDT
How do you get it for $5 per month? It is $15 last I checked.
by shinji257 May 28, 2009 8:23 AM PDT
@monkeyfun14: Last I looked both the ipods and zunes shared the same hard drives. The failure rates are more likely the user rather than the player.

P.S. - I should know. I dropped mine and the hard drive failed afterwards. Managed a warranty replace even though I did wrong but a week later they came out with larger models so they may of been trying to get rid of the older generation
by johnnyzero54 June 1, 2009 11:54 AM PDT
3g is only for phones silly everyone knows that . the phone company has to make there money
by andychrist1 May 27, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
Look at the way "marketplace" and "more" are chopped off on the side and bottom of the display. And this is a publicity photo? MS is just as sloppy as ever. This bodes ill.
Reply to this comment
by Lumiseon May 29, 2009 3:23 PM PDT
Are you a stupid moron? Ever hear of SCROLL DOWN TO SEE THE REST OF THE MENU???????????????????????

And Marketplace is a big word, and they have nice big font for everything. Get over yourself.
by agusus May 27, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
> "the tens of millions of users who bought an iPod didn't care about radio."

That's not true. You're making a huge generalization with no proof of your thesis.
I've bought iPods but I do care a lot about having radio, and HD radio would be even cooler. I simply bought an iPod because a competitive Zune wasn't released yet when I was buying my music player (this was back when only the v1 Zune was out). If the Zune HD works well I very likely will buy it.
Having radio is a huge benefit for when I get bored with the music I have loaded on my device, or when I want to listen to news or NPR. It's also super useful if you workout at a gym that uses FM frequencies to broadcast the audio channel of their TVs (I used to go to a gym that did this).

Re: a commenter above who said if you don't live in NYC or LA then you get no HD radio stations, the hdradio.com site says I can get like 20 or 30 HD radio stations in Seattle, including my top 3 favorite stations that I already listen to on my non-HD radio.
Reply to this comment
by stewcanoe May 27, 2009 5:28 PM PDT
Zune Pass is not that great of a deal. It is a music lease. When you quit paying the monthly subscription price, kiss the bulk of your music library goodbye. Even if you figure on 10 permanent songs a month that comes out to 1.49 per song. Not all that great. Not to mention the diversity of content available on iTunes. If you cannot stand iPods or Apple, save your money and buy a Creative Labs Zen. I have gone back to iTunes because the pricing is straight forward and simple. Microsoft's idea of having to spend real money to buy credits so I can buy songs is cumbersome at best. And as I said the subscription idea is just a way to hide the higher cost of permanent music. Besides, my original iPod is still working. (I replaced the battery myself and the drive has never had a problem.) My original Zune is kaput after only about a year. One day it just quit working. So I am sticking with the simple straight forward iPod. I do however like the standard ear buds on the Zune over the stock iPod buds. Maybe Apple should buy their buds from Microsoft!
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 27, 2009 6:19 PM PDT
What are they supposed to give you unlimited drm free songs for 15 a month and still make a profit?
by Seaspray0 May 28, 2009 8:32 AM PDT
I'm don't agree with your logic, stewcanoe. You get to download 10 songs without DRM a month for free. How much would you pay for those on itunes? Add in the benefit of being able to listen to just about any song you want, anytime...it can be well worth it. But that's for individuals to decide... it will be worth it to some, but not others. There is no right answer here. There is a wrong answer, and that's claiming that your way is the right way for everyone else.
by stewcanoe July 21, 2009 6:00 AM PDT
Seaspray0 says 14.95/mo is free!?!? If you are paying 14.95/mo for the subscription, and you get only 10 permanent songs for that monthly fee, then that comes out to 1.49/song. With iTunes there is no monthly subscription fee. You only pay for the songs you buy. And they are yours. The average price on iTunes is now about 1.19/song. And what if you don't want to buy 10 songs a month? With Microsoft you are still paying 14.95!
by surfboy90291 May 27, 2009 6:05 PM PDT
It was the record labels that required the DRM. It was also the record labels decision to increase the price for top selling tracks. This gave Apple the necessary leverage to negotiate the removal of DRM in exchange for variable track pricing. At any time, any purchased music from the iTunes store could be, on an authorized computer (and you can authorize 5), burned to a CD or, in later versions of iTunes, converted to MP3s, free of DRM.
Reply to this comment
by H3y-y0u May 27, 2009 7:29 PM PDT
This is why we should just buy CDs. Unless of course you just want a few singles.
by DrtyDogg May 28, 2009 3:16 AM PDT
you have to pay to remove the DRM legally.
by xkpierce May 27, 2009 6:10 PM PDT
give me a better registration experience, an equalizer, and more zune-compatible after market products (two zune-dockable clock radios? really?) and i'll be happy with the current offering. is it a licensing issue that (by my guess) 98% of all after market products are not compatible with zune?
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 May 28, 2009 8:34 AM PDT
Maybe you can start up a company that makes a zune dock.
by DigitalAngelic May 29, 2009 5:36 AM PDT
Not a licensing issue, it's just that more people use iPods.
by SuPaGrAm May 27, 2009 6:32 PM PDT
I like the 14.99/month unlimited...

Everyone is trying so hard to find flaws in everything microsoft does, seriously think about it you can download whatever the hell you want as much as you want and pay $15 a month. Right now I have downloaded 2344 songs (about 18GB) and 50 permanently, I don't need to tell you how much that would cost on itunes.

It's not for everyone but just because it's microsoft doesn't mean it's evil. If you download a lot of music (legally at least) than this is a lot cheaper.

Also Zune HD seems awesome, I'll probably buy it on boxing day with Windows 7.
Reply to this comment
by xkpierce May 27, 2009 6:49 PM PDT
i can appreciate your position. however, i don't think ms is evil. but look at it this way: one of the biggest (if not the biggest) tech companies in the world can't (or won"t) jump into the mp3/4 world while a competitor eats them alive. why bother getting into the market at all if you're not going to do the best you can?
i have new zune 120,
by stewcanoe May 27, 2009 7:03 PM PDT
It really isn't 14.99/mo unlimited. You only get to listen for 14.00/mo, with only 10 perm. downloads. You need to read the agreement. If you discontinue your subscription, you don't get to keep all that. You can listen all you want, and download 10. When you quit most of it goes away.

And I don't dislike Microsoft. I use PC's, I have a PC laptop, and desktop. My smart phone uses Windows Mobile. And I love Halo for the PC. (And don't forget Flight Simulator!) I just don't like the way Microsoft is marketing Zune Pass. They keep using the word unlimited and that is highly misleading at best. (Besides, my phone not only has FM radio but is are pretty decent MP3 player to boot.)

My iPod is just easier to use, and I like just buying my music outright without the shenanigans. In any case, enjoy your Zune. I'm sure it will bring you great joy. As long as you keep paying 14.99/month.
by travisvn1 May 27, 2009 7:08 PM PDT
I would have to agree with you on that one lets do the math. 2344 songs x $.99 = $2320.56/ $15 = 154 months or 12.892 years of Zune pass subscription. that is not taking into account the songs you would also download in those 12 years plus the 1540 permanent songs you get to download (10/month x 154) Zune pass is by far more economical. Who cares if you own the music in 12 years I'm sure I will be listening to something different anyways and it wont cost any more to download that music. How many times do people subscribe to netflix for movies or rent DVDs? It is the same thing.
by stewcanoe May 27, 2009 7:34 PM PDT
So I guess it depends on whether you want to rent or buy. I happen to like to buy. And while I agree that you can buy the songs you listen to on Zune, you have to do so through a system that seems to have been designed by the folks at Chuck E Cheese, where you buy tokens so you can play.

But lets compare apples to apples. (Sorry. I couldn't resist) Assuming you buy 10 songs a month with either system. The cost for those 10 songs is still significantly cheaper at iTunes. 10 songs/mo. on iTunes at your 154 months comes out to 1524.60. The same 10 songs will cost you 2308.46 using Zune Pass. For the same number of permanent songs you pay 783.86 more for Zune Pass. iTunes is still cheaper. But you are correct that you cannot stream songs on an iPod. (But you can on the iPhone. I don't know about the iTouch)
Also we have not seen Apples new pricing model where they say the average cost of a song will be 1.09. We'll just have to wait and see. They could come up with something worse than Zune Pass.
And responding to scrubbingbubbles, I don't see FM going away anytime soon. Not when you consider that it is available for 100% of the US population, and it is free. HD currently has less than 20% geographic coverage.
by stewcanoe May 27, 2009 7:49 PM PDT
A coworker just brought up a good point. How many people actually download 120 songs a year? Very few. Most iTunes users spend less than $10/mo on their music library. For example, my average for music purchases is only 2.7 songs/month. Turns out I spend less than $3.00/month on music downloads. Zune Pass users will pay 14.99/mo. even if they download nothing! Even at 10 songs a month it comes out to 9.90/mo for iTunes and 14.99/mo for Zune Pass. Where are the great savings? I don't see the advantage. Oh, yeah. It is much to Microsoft's advantage for users to pay 14.99/mo and not buy anything. Very shrewd.
by stockyjoe May 27, 2009 10:44 PM PDT
You'd be surprised how many people download more then 120 songs in a DAY with Zune pass. Zune pass does rock.
by lonewarriorjs May 28, 2009 1:26 AM PDT
i had zune pass and downloaded 6000 songs give or take 100 in 2 weeks. my pc was on 24/7 of course. and if u dont connect ur zune to the pc after ur pass has run out u can keep using the songs for an extra month or 2.
by monkeyfun14 May 28, 2009 4:40 AM PDT
The music just doesn't go away...

It deactivates all you need to do is renew the sub and I found with only a month subscription I ended up downloading music for like 5 months before they cut it off. Idk if it was a glitch though.
by Zoobie May 28, 2009 1:50 PM PDT
@travisn1: "Who cares if you own the music in 12 years I'm sure I will be listening to something different anyways."

You sound like someone who is pretty young. Plenty of people own music more than 12 years old--many people own music more than 50 years old--1960 was 49 years ago, and a lot of Beatles music by itself is going on 40 years. Then there are all those Guitar Hero games with Aerosmith, Van Halen, and all sorts of junk from the 1980's (25 years ago). 12 years might sound like a long time if your a kid, but not so much if you're at the other end looking back.

Having said that, I'm glad to see MS putting out something that looks competitive. I have a 3G iPod that still works wonderfully, and I've wanted to get an iPod Touch but can't justify the expense until my current one breaks. Marketplace competition is great. MS would have never developed this if there were no Touch/iPhone, and this will push Apple to develop newer, better features. In the end, it's good for all of us, so I don't understand all these people who are in love with a corporation to the point they have to be rude to each other about their allegiancies on boards like this.
by cpopken May 30, 2009 8:26 AM PDT
12 years is a long time when you think about music trends. The music popular today most likely will not be popular in 12 years. Good music transcends time. The crap that is popular today will not.

I don't really see what is matters if people want to use the Zune Pass to get their music. It is not like it is a requirement to have a Zune, if you want to have it you can, and if you don't you don't have to. You can get your music from Amazon, iTunes, or other sources. You don't have to have a pass to get music.

I personally feel that the Zune Marketplace is a much better interface that iTunes is. Just remember that iTunes and the iPod didn't really start to take off until Apple made a PC version of iTunes.
See more comment replies
by scrubbingbubbles May 27, 2009 6:51 PM PDT
Lets not kid ourselves.....FM radio is on the path of VHS tapes and Newspapers. In a few words....on the way out!
Fm radio is a novelty selling point at best. Of course i would listen to it if I had it. But not like i listen to podcasts (which is religiously)
HD radio is again a novelty unless you live in a HD hotbed. Namely LA, NYC and the like.
Reply to this comment
by CrashPad63 May 28, 2009 1:15 PM PDT
Theyve said the same thing about AM bub since the 70's guess what?Its still here. I love generalization of ones own opinion.
by Zoobie May 28, 2009 1:52 PM PDT
You can't have a board like this without people sharing their statistically significant sample size of one (self) or a few ("none/all of the people I know...").
by stockyjoe May 27, 2009 10:42 PM PDT
I like the zune as an MP3 player so the storage capacity is more of interest to me. What I dont understand, why would you make such a nice device and put old windows mobile 6.5 based on the IE6 engine on that thing? That's full of fail and just downgraded the device if you intend to use it as a browser.
Reply to this comment
by DigitalAngelic May 29, 2009 5:46 AM PDT
"Old" Windows Mobile 6.5? It just came out!
by John Elberling May 27, 2009 10:45 PM PDT
claiming the Zilch HD is somehow really comparable to the Touch 3.0, with all its apps (and 25% larger display) is absurd. you'd have to be on crack. and when the new 2009 Touch models are released at the same time this fall as the Zilch, very likely adding full GPS/compass location app services (plus camera?), it could be a massacre in the marketplace.

only good explanation is the Zilch HD is really a place holder for MS until a real WinMobile 7 Zune with apps is ready in 2010. so make some lemonade with the Zune lemon - HD radio and XBox tie-in - and add lots of bravado - bring on the Touch! - hoping to just to keep the brand alive until then.

but this could backfire big time. the 2009 Touch could well be a sensational product - and a no-kidding Zune "killer."
Reply to this comment
by ElSuperBeasto May 28, 2009 10:29 PM PDT
"claiming the Zilch HD is somehow really comparable to the Touch 3.0, with all its apps (and 25% larger display) is absurd."

Really? Yeah there are about 30,000-40,000, but I could count on my fingers the number of apps that I've found useful or entertaining for more than a couple of minutes on my Touch. And the display is definitely not 25% larger, the figure is closer to 18% if you're talking about the total number of pixels, and less than that for the physical screen size. Any advantage in screen size is rendered null by the sheer quality of an OLED screen, here take a look at this comparison http://www.pocketables.net/2009/03/apple-ipod-touch-2g-vs-cowon-s9-vs-samsung-p3.html .
by Firehazel May 30, 2009 6:51 PM PDT
@ John
Shut up, sheep.
i see this thing with a very viable chance in the market.
by Banshee1990 June 9, 2009 1:23 AM PDT
lets see the zune's 3.3 wide screen format vs the touch's 3.5 3:2 aspect ratio so there is a 5-6% difference there son, but the zune's screen is very useful in watching Widescreen movies
From what we know at the moment is that It has all the selling points of the touch ooooooo and Plus at the moment the better of the two processors. The zune actually looks may I say it manly unlike the rounded block called the touch. The hd has corner that remind me of a Muscle cars body IDK I just like the shiny screen and the smudge resistant back.
by lonewarriorjs May 28, 2009 1:21 AM PDT
ok sorry but radio has upgraded to digital radio, or at least in california, and digital radio is the same as hd radio.

Personally i think MS is wasting their money doing this. its just a slimmer slightly more advanced version of the zunes that are out now. if they really wanted to make an impact i think they should have incorporated a phone in to the device.

so until they make a zune phone im just going to stick with my current zune which ive had for 2 years and no problems. Unlike the ipods ive previously had which seem to have something go wrong right when the warranty ends.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (99 Comments)
advertisement
Click Here

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About Digital Noise: Music and Tech

Matt Rosoff is an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, where he covers Microsoft's consumer products and corporate news. He's written about the technology industry since 1995 and reviewed the first Rio MP3 player for CNET.com in 1998. He's also a bass guitarist and an avid collector (and digitizer) of LP records. DISCLAIMER: This blog contains the personal opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the opinions of his employers or of CNET Networks. As an IT industry analyst, the author occasionally agrees to nondisclosure agreements from Microsoft or other companies, and he will not violate the terms of such agreements on this blog.

He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Noise: Music and Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right