7 days with Google Chrome
When Google Chrome was released a week ago, I bravely volunteered to use the browser exclusively for the next seven days. That means no Firefox, no IE, no Opera, only Chrome, with no exceptions. I was fully expecting a week of frustrations, incompatibilities, and annoyances. I was ready to criticize all of the fatal flaws that were sure to turn up. I am happy to say that I was wrong. Google Chrome passes the full-time use test with flying colors.
(You can get Chrome from CNET Download.com.)One of the first things that people notice when they load up Google Chrome is the gigantic viewing window. Chrome's presentation is very elegant, with the larger than usual viewing window, beautiful animations, browser bar that searches, suggests, and shows history, and a good-looking and highly functional start page. Page searches also show the locations in which your search terms appear in the scroll bar. Surfing has been way easier on my eyes in the past week.
Chrome shows the locations of search terms in the scroll bar.
As everyone else has mentioned, Chrome is really snappy when using Google apps. Gmail and Google Reader work like a dream. Loading each tab in its own process also makes a difference. If you are in the middle of something important, a balky page or Flash element in a different tab doesn't crash everything. During my entire test of Chrome, there was only one instance when the whole browser started choking, but it was able to pull itself out of it. Chrome certainly showed nothing like the crashing issues that pop up with Firefox (although they have been made better with Firefox 3).
Windows Live Mail is incompatible with Google Chrome, suggesting that you "Upgrade your web browser."
The most serious issue I ran into was incompatibility with Windows Live Hotmail (seen above), which is a showstopper if you are a Hotmail user. It seems like this is an easily correctable issue and probably not the fault of Google. Chrome also suffers from the same insanely annoying bug as Firefox, where Flash videos sometimes stop after two seconds.
The thing I missed the most by switching from Firefox to Chrome for the week is the absence of my Remember The Milk todo list in Gmail. Google is promising extensions for Chrome, but doesn't support them yet, so you lose a lot of the functionality that Firefox's extensions provide.
All in all, my experience with Chrome was very positive and it really did not give me any major difficulties. I see Google Chrome potentially winning over some of Firefox's users, especially if they add extensions and get support from the developer community.
Chrome is more than a bright and shiny Google lab experiment. It's a useful browser that is going to steal share from the existing products.
Harrison Hoffman is a tech enthusiast and co-founder of LiveSide.net, a blog about Windows Live. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. 



erm... I use Chrome at work I found by clicking the "Continue to Windows Live Hotmail" shown in the screen grab above everything worked fine. Are you saying it didn't for you? All the page is saying is it doesn't know if your browser supports all the necessary JavaScript. Hardly a showstopper.
Unlike Firefox, Chrome is not customizable, has no add-ons (that I could find), and doesn't use "user scripts" -- these are probably the three main reasons people use Firefox. So, if anything, Chrome may steal more IE users, but certainly not FF users.
(Other problems -- wouldn't remember passwords, though it was set to do so, didn't look nice at all, and had glaring problems with the menus, or lack thereof.)
I developed software for 18 years. I have used a browser since Netscape 1. I push my browser hard since I frequently have 30 or 40 or 50+ web pages open at one time while researching. That makes IE die, while FF gets increasingly slower. Chrome does not even notice. It just keeps purring along.
The process management in Chrome is so powerful, yet you don't even know it's there -- how ELEGANT!
All this misinformation about "no add-ons" is just a red-hearing, because, being open source, Chrome will soon have all the add-ons you would need.
As for the other small details, well they are exactly that: small details.
I moved from FF to Chrome in a matter of minutes and have not looked back.
So much usability within such a clean interface. Again, how ELEGANT!
Thanks Google!
On the other hand, I tried installing FF3 a few weeks and was very disappointed. It brought my pc to a grinding halt. I had to unistall FF3 and reinstall FF2.
1. Flock
2. Chrome
3. Mozilla Firefox
4. Apple Safari
5. IE
6. Opera
Also, there's no plugins, especially no AdBlock. It seems to have no defenses against spyware. There's always spyware to clean, lots more than with Firefox, or even, surprise, IE 8 beta.
It's supposed to be for online apps, but there's no link or anything that would take you to them, or to suggest them. Those little youtube guides were so short and unintelligible as to be useless.
Care to expand on this? The size of viewing window on my screen is always predicated by the size of my screen regardless of browser in use so this particular comment has me scratching my head. Do you mean there's less real estate taken up by toolbars? I find fullscreen mode (again on any browser) quite useful for maximizing view.
@saintseminole: I absolutely think that Chrome's interface is elegant. It's simplistic nature and presentation of animations, including tabs and new downloads, makes for an intuitive and seemingly effortless UI, but you can be sure that they put a lot of work into perfecting it.
@Joetwopointoh: Yes, moving the tabs to above the address bar into an area that's usually just dead space helps to increase the viewing area, something that Firefox doesn't do. The menus are in line with the address bar, taking away another line, giving you more space. Of course you can turn off the bookmarks toolbar (which I did), but you can also do that in Firefox. The status bar at the bottom fades in, only when needed, opening up some more space there. The UI is just slimmer and more compact overall, giving you more space to look at the actual web page.
I can't bring myself to use full screen mode since it covers the start bar and all of my tray icons. At least with this, I still have a very large viewing window, and access to the start bar.
Jeff Thoele
jthoele@consolidated.net
- by McGillis September 12, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
- F11! The inability to conveniently use the whole screen as in MSIE or Firefox is a big oversight. Worse, I can find no way to get there.
- Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (39 Comments)