October 21, 2009 8:01 AM PDT

Taking a look at Nook

by Peter Glaskowsky
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

I'm very impressed by the Nook, Barnes & Noble's new e-book reader. It's clear B&N has studied Sony's Reader and Amazon's Kindle very carefully.

The Nook has almost all of the major features of both product lines, plus a few more, with few competitive disadvantages. B&N has also followed Amazon's lead on support services. The Nook has a very good online e-book store as well as applications to support e-book reading on Macs, Windows machines, and smartphones.

(Credit: Barnes & Noble)

The Nook doesn't ship until the end of November, but here's what I found most significant from the announcement and the pages at nook.com:

Industrial design
I think the Nook is attractive and well-designed. It looks better than the Kindle 2, but not as good as Sony's Reader Touch Edition, which offers a larger screen in a smaller form factor. Also, Sony's forthcoming Reader Daily Edition is only slightly larger than the Nook, but offers a much larger screen.

Secondary color display
This feature surprised me. It seems expensive and insufficiently functional for what must be a significant added cost. The low resolution of this display (480 x 144, according to a CNET blog post) means it won't be useful for much beyond the basic user-interface features B&N has already described: book covers, menus, and a keyboard for note-taking. (Although I should note for the record that while B&N says "Its full-color touchscreen encourages you to bookmark, add notes, and highlight passages," I haven't found a photo on the company Web site depicting the virtual keyboard shown in some of the pre-release images. Perhaps that's one of the features still under development.)

By comparison, the secondary color screen built into the Alex e-book reader from Spring Design, shown in another recent CNET story, is large enough to be useful. Unfortunately, it's also large enough to be very much in the way, leading to an awkward device. Spring Design and B&N need to make up their minds-- are they making e-book readers or something else?

Wi-Fi and book lending
These features seem to have attracted a lot of attention, but in my opinion they don't add much value to the user. Wi-Fi sounds good, but 3G networking is more widely available and plenty fast enough for the kind of content the Nook supports. Like the color display, however, it adds cost and consumes power.

B&N says that "when you use your nook in a Barnes & Noble Bookstore, you can access exclusive content and special offers." That sounds more like a value for B&N: another way to sell things to Nook users.

One thing I'm curious about here, though: did the Wi-Fi feature make it easier for B&N to negotiate the 3G deal with AT&T by shifting some of the bandwidth demand to home and office networks?

The ability to lend Nook books to friends sounds like a well-meant attempt to emulate a key advantage of paper books, but the 14-day term turns a friendly offer into a kind of burden. Again, as a sales tool, this feature is more of a value to Barnes & Noble than to the users. What the e-book market really needs is an implementation of the First-Sale Doctrine, the ability to permanently transfer e-books to friends. I'm willing to accept significant limitations on this ability so that free second-hand e-books won't destroy the commercial e-book market, and I can think of several ways to solve that problem--but lending is not the answer.

Price
The $259 price is a very good deal for what you get. Many experts have speculated that Amazon subsidizes the price of the Kindle. If that's so, then B&N must be looking at a much larger subsidy for the Nook.

The extra color display, though small, must add at least $20 to the price of the machine. The Wi-Fi feature probably accounts for another $10. All of that comes out of B&N's bottom line.

Larger e-book store
Barnes & Noble says it offers over a million e-books, newspapers, and magazines. Amazon claims over 350,000. About half of the B&N total represents free books, mostly old public-domain works from Google Books, but that still leaves more books than Amazon's whole collection, which itself includes a lot of free and public-domain works.

Expandable memory
I have no idea why the Kindle 2 doesn't support any kind of memory expansion. To my way of thinking, this is a bizarre oversight on Amazon's part.

The Nook has a few missing features, but nothing crucial:

No Web browsing
B&N's deal with AT&T for 3G wireless service at no additional cost may not be as good as the deal Amazon made with Sprint. Amazon got permission to offer "experimental" Web browsing and Wikipedia access. Even though these features don't work very well because of the E-Ink display technology, their absence gives the Nook a disadvantage.

No text to speech
But since the Nook has everything needed to implement this feature--audio output, general-purpose audio support in the Android operating system, etc.--I expect this feature will show up before long.

No international access
Same situation here--and the Nook has the advantage of using the GSM-based AT&T network which is inherently compatible with most cell phone networks around the world.

No large-screen version
I expect it's just a matter of time before B&N introduces a full-page device to compete with the Kindle DX. (In the meantime, however, I wish they'd skipped the color display and used the space to support the 7" display found on the Sony Reader Daily Edition.)

Bottom line, I think the Nook is a fine product and should be very successful. It's an impressively mature offering from a company just entering the market. Aside from the few missing features, I think Amazon would have been proud to offer the Nook itself as the Kindle 3. Also, Barnes & Noble is in a position to compete more directly with Amazon than Sony has been able to do, which will help accelerate the growth of the e-book market.

I don't think I'll get a Nook myself unless some business-related reason pops up, such as competitive-analysis consulting. I have pretty much stopped using my Sony Reader, but I use my Kindle all the time. It accounts for about half of all the books I read, and I read a lot. Adding another device to my collection would probably result in two of them sitting idle.

Anyone considering the purchase of an e-book reader, however, would be well-advised to take a close look at the Nook, the Kindle 2, and Sony's Readers. They're all pretty good, and the choice among them will boil down to minor differences and personal preferences.

Correction 12:20 p.m. PDT Thursday: This story initially misstated where the Nook's Wi-Fi feature will work at launch. It will work anywhere, not just at Barnes & Noble stores as incorrectly stated by B&N representatives at the launch event.

Peter N. Glaskowsky is a computer architect in Silicon Valley and a technology analyst for the Envisioneering Group. He has designed chip- and board-level products in the defense and computer industries, managed design teams, and served as editor in chief of the industry newsletter "Microprocessor Report." He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Speeds and Feeds
So long, and thanks for all the hits
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 5: Access
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 4: Security
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 3: Ruggedness
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 2: Reliability
Wrapping up Speeds and Feeds, part 1: Efficiency
Tilera's balancing act: 100 cores vs. market realities
The Gizmo Report: WikiReader--simple, singular
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by jgbt October 21, 2009 10:52 AM PDT
The secondary display is not so useless as you seem to think; e-ink is OK for turning pages, but clunky for navigation, especially for menu choices or anything complex. The secondary display is big enough for this and much more responsive.
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 21, 2009 11:41 AM PDT
Well, I just said it doesn't seem useful enough to justify the price. It's more flash than dash.

. png
by rnaoncfixd October 22, 2009 6:13 AM PDT
I saw the .png and was waiting to see a picture. It turns out that it is your signature. Boy, is my face red.

Back on topic, at the same price as a Kindle, I don't think it's too much as far as wi-fi enabled, dual screen e-readers go.
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 22, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
I tried to press a trademark claim against the Portable Network Graphics Development Group, but then I realized that could create a legal precedent would open me up to a lawsuit from the nation of Papua New Guinea. I tried to get some advice from John Paul Getty, but it turns out he died a few years ago, so I decided to let the whole matter drop.

. png
by sapporobaby October 21, 2009 11:05 AM PDT
Make up your mind. Is the wifi useless or not? You see, many Americans actually live outside of the US and are not up to paying roaming charges or having no wireless access to our content. B&N, through wifi made this possible. Amazon is behind the curve. Who ever heard of not putting wifi in such a device. In my book this is a deal breaker. As an American it really pains me at how parochial many Americans are in their myopic thinking.
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 21, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
Americans living outside the US have always been able to use the Kindle, including buying new content; it just requires a laptop. The up-front cost of adding Wi-Fi hardware is significant, and it burdens the cost of every Nook sold. Even though the cost comes out of B&N's profits, you may be sure that this money will be added to the prices of their books in the long run.
by kaseyh October 21, 2009 5:40 PM PDT
Might it be that they are making up some of the cost of the wifi hardware in a cheaper contract with AT&T? That in addition to the a broader market (3G is not available everywhere, but anyone with an internet connection will find the wifi useable) may make the extra hardware cost worth every penny to BN.
by -fjtorres- October 21, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
All things being more or less equal wouldn't the typical consumer buy the reader with the *cheaper* ebook prices?
Right now that would be Amazon, no?
Reply to this comment
by mtnmagic1998 October 28, 2009 9:40 AM PDT
From what I've seen just today, Amazon now has a kindle for $259.00 which is the same price as the Nook,
by Januss331 October 21, 2009 1:24 PM PDT
I'm digging the Nook. So much so that I already preordered mine. However, I have to point out that ATT's 3G service kinda stinks. So while we don't need the speed-we do need the coverage area. I'm fortunate that I am in an area with 3G coverage. But due to my lifestyle, I often find myself outside of coverage areas. I like the idea of wifi being there so I don't have to deal with 3G service.

Another reason why I jumped on it is the PDF file format support: ESSENTIAL for any kind of research work. Everything is a PDF now. I hate printing out endless 30 pg research papers to study only to throw them away after I'm done. And I can't read it on a computer screen without getting some serious eye fatigue. I would have loved this when I was in college, now that I'm in medical school and in the 3rd and 4th year curriculum, the assigned readings come from PDFs from online sources. Reading those PDFs on my iPhone again is an eyesore on places like the BART (or other commuter sources).

I'm also excited that BN is releasing a device. I was holding off on the Kindle 2/DX because I've always been an avid supporter of BN.

If the color screen has a good keyboard then what the heck, why not. Kinda an oddball feature but if it works, then it works. I just wish the Nook came out EARLIER than at the end of November!
Reply to this comment
by Peter N. Glaskowsky October 21, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
We'll have to see how the PDF function really works. For example, if the Nook can't reflow the text in PDF files, I can guarantee you're still not going to be happy with PDFs on an 800x600 screen. I've tried dozens of representative PDF files on my Sony Reader, and it's simply impossible to read many of them. By the time the text is magnified until it's legible, a single line overflows the screen, forcing painful horizontal scrolling. And figures are often illegible at any resolution because color and grayscale information disappears entirely.

Good luck, though. I do hope they have this figured out. I just think it's too soon to move to e-book readers for educational and professional use, especially on these small-screen devices.

. png
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Speeds and Feeds

Silicon Valley-based computer architect and chip analyst Peter N. Glaskowsky attends a variety of industry conferences throughout the year to meet with industry thought leaders and dig into the future of computing technology. In Speeds and Feeds, he analyzes trends in system architecture and interface design, as well as market and political pressures surrounding those trends. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Speeds and Feeds topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right