Google taking security a little too seriously?
It looks like Google is marking all of its search results with this warning: "This site may harm your computer."
If you click on a Google result link in spite of the warning, you get an interstitial page with an additional warning: "Warning - visiting this web site may harm your computer!"
Clicking the warning itself will take you to this page, which explains: "This warning message appears with search results we've identified as sites that may install malicious software on your computer."
The server(s) that hosts that page seems to be getting hammered right now. No surprise. So is StopBadware.org, a site Google refers its users to for more information.
And so is the Google server that provides more detailed diagnostics for sites allegedly failing Google's safety tests, such as this report for the presumably clean Wikipedia site.
Coincidentally, I was reviewing the diagnostics page just yesterday for a site that had been infected by malware. The diagnostics page identified the origin of the malware that Google spotted on the server it was warning about. I wonder what, if anything, Google is saying about all these allegedly infected sites this morning... especially since Google is warning about its own site as well, if your search encompasses one of Google's own pages.
Something, I think, is amiss in Mountain View...
UPDATE: Todd Gardner suggests this problem was caused by an outage at StopBadware.org. If so, Google needs to rethink its fail-safe strategy for this data source.
UPDATE 2: Google seems to be working normally again.
UPDATE 3: According to a comment on this post by CNET user stopbadware, manager of StopBadware.org, and a blog post on that site titled Google glitch causes confusion, the problem was not with StopBadware.org.
UPDATE 4: According to this post on the official Google blog site by Marissa Mayer, Google vice president of search products & user experience, the problem was caused by a bad update to Google's list of malware-infected Web sites. As the post says, "the URL of '/' was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and '/' expands to all URLs."
Mayer reports that the problem has been fully solved and promises that Google "will carefully investigate this incident and put more robust file checks in place to prevent it from happening again."
Peter N. Glaskowsky is a computer architect in Silicon Valley and a technology analyst for the Envisioneering Group. He has designed chip- and board-level products in the defense and computer industries, managed design teams, and served as editor in chief of the industry newsletter "Microprocessor Report." He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. 





Cheers
Mike in Buenos Aires
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=1134775
. png
Awesome. Eh.
Do you mean that the responses to your queries are being manipulated?
I know that the ads you see on Google can vary according to such factors, but if Google is selectively altering search _results_ on that basis, I haven't heard about it. Can you provide a source for this information?
Eric Schmidt the CEO of Google is also on the board of directors at Apple, and a Free Mason.
I have also noticed that Google results can vary from one user to another, but I think this is just a consequence of Google's rather loosely coupled site architecture-- it isn't exactly deterministic by design, more like herding cats.
too funny
If you google 'google'
it suggests that their site may harm your computer
is the Firefox plugin that allows the user to choose which scripts (Java, JavaScript), Flash content, cross-scripts, and other hazardous web content to display when you visit a web site.
Since most malware comes from this type of content, it is important to be very selective about what is allowed to run on a website and install on your computer.
It takes a little more effort to surf the web with NoScript (but it takes a lot of effort to get malware off your system or re-install a system crippled with malware).
Even though the problem was caused by StopBadware.org, the responsibility is Google's since it affected their site. When building distributed systems, paranoia is a healthy attitude.
There was no need to toss your cookies.
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
- by Authortrek January 31, 2009 8:36 AM PST
- Great article, which I have referenced in my own account, which contains a poem that I have previously written about Google's monopolistic behavior: http://inprint.thesyp.org.uk/news.php?id=190
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Grifter02 January 31, 2009 7:59 PM PST
- It's called monopolistic behavior when a company becomes popular now? I'm pretty sure they have lots of competition. And everything they offer is free, so who cares???
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (39 Comments)