The hot fuel scam costs motorists big bucks
In California, 71.5 million gallons of phantom hot fuel will get sold in California during the summer and 21.9 million gallons will get delivered by Arizona pumps. Alaska gains some gallons.
A Congressional report says that U.S. motorists will pay $1.4 billion extra over the summer months for gasoline that expands at high temperatures. Steve Everly at the Kansas City Star has been digging into the issue.
Who was the chair of the committee? Sometimes presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich. I wish this were in the hands of someone with a bigger and more respected microphone. This is important stuff.
Martin Tobias is the CEO and chairman of Imperium Renewables and a venture partner at Ignition Partners. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network. 



http://youtube.com/watch?v=CMovXzVOzc4
http://youtube.com/watch?v=UVhXrvCCILw&mode=related&search=
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3333992194168790800&q=water+powered+car&pr=goog-sl
and that there's some variability to the price. Of course, most gas tanks are
underground, which greatly stabilizes the average temperature of the gas
when it's pumped; you don't seem to have considered that. But even apart
from this point, the only thing that would happen if gas prices were adjusted
according to the temperature of the gas is that gas prices would go up or
down according to the location. Certainly the gas companies aren't just going
to say "oh! I guess we ought to be making less money!"
As for the other commenter's reference to using water as a fuel, this is a
scam. Consider: start with a tank of water. Process the water into hydrogen
and oxygen any way you like. Then burn the hydrogen and oxygen to make
water, which you put back into the tank. If the conversion process consumes
less energy than the burning does, you have a perpetual motion machine.
This is a scam. This is a scam. This is a scam. What I tell you three times is
true.
. png
See my CNET blog: http://blogs.cnet.com/8300-13512_1-23.html
- by BSChemistry May 11, 2008 9:06 AM PDT
- The Conservation of Energy and the First Law of Thermodynamics Can?t be Ignored.
- Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_law_of_thermodynamics
The Iceland produces hydrogen from hydrothermal energy. The cost of production is cheap because is only a combination of Capital investment and Plant Operation Cost and FREE (geothermal energy).
To produce Hydrogen we have to spend a lot of Energy.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/thermo/electrol.html
By providing energy from a battery, water (H2O) can be dissociated into the diatomic molecules of hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2).
H2O => (H2) + ½ (O2) -285.83 kJ @ temperature 298K (Eo = 1.229 V)
The efficiency of water electrolysis is not 100%.
This event will occur on any conductive surface. When the proper amount of energy is applied, however, certain materials such as high surface area metals are more efficient and consume less energy to produce a given amount of hydrogen. The precious metal platinum has shown great activity for water electrolysis, attaining over 50% efficiency. Using electrodes composed of QSI nanometals, QSI has achieved up to 80% efficiency at lower current flow rates (100 mA/cm2) and approximately 60% efficiency at higher rates (1000 mA/cm2). The feed water of the electrolyzer must be distilled or deionized water, which is not cheap too.
Using ready to go technology with 80% efficiency and the electrode current density of (100mA/cm2), the water electrolyzer is not very compact and efficient, and the electrodes don?t last forever.
Installed in a car, the energy sourced from the battery has to be replaced by alternator, which in return used car engine energy with an efficiency of 25% to 30% of the burned gasoline. Producing free electricity from the Regenerative Braking System, or from Thermocouple Electrical Power Generator using the heat of exhaust system, is a different but not a simple story.