Ridicule has its place.
This is going to be something of an "inside baseball" post so if you're looking for news or rumors, you're out of luck.
If, instead, you're the kind of reader who likes snippy disagreements between pedantic Mac nerds, well, read on, friend!
MacJournals News has taken to task the Mac bloggers who openly mocked "Sticker Guy" as he has come to be known -- the reporter who asked Steve Jobs why Apple doesn't participate in the "Intel inside" promotion. According to MacJournals, the revenue the promotion would generate for Apple is reason enough for the question to be a good one.
The Macalope is proud to count himself as a "Logotard", as MacJournals humorously called us, even if it is a bit of a malapropism as we are clearly "Lack-of-logo-tards".
Because it was a stupid question. Sure, maybe not the stupidest question he could have asked, but still a whopper. Because while there may be valid reasons why other companies might take Intel's money and run, there is no chance on Odin's green earth that Apple would ever do it. To ask such a question is simply to display one's ignorance of Apple and Steve Jobs. The only stickers that you'll find on Apple products are those clear ones that protect them on their magical journey to your doorstep.
MacJournals lists other possible questions a reporter could have asked Jobs and discounts them because he would not have provided anything other than...
...marketing platitudes about great new products, great Intel chips, how cool Leopard is, and how hard they're working on the future.
How that excuses asking a stupid question is quite beyond the horned one, but it's also just not true. At All Things Digital, for example, Jobs was asked about the stagnancy of .Mac and revealed that a revision would be coming soon.
Is it easy to get information out of him you wouldn't get somewhere else? No. But it's not impossible, and "Sticker Guy" blew an opportunity. It's not the end of the world, it doesn't mean he's stupid, but there are times when people do stupid things that are just funny.
Mythical beast and rumormonger extraordinaire, the Macalope writes about all things Apple for the CNET Blog Network. Read more at The Macalope: An Apple blog. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.




- as a compny - is about at its core. You know, the kind of thing someone
attending such an event should be familiar with. How did Sticker Guy get a
Press Pass? No matter - it'll surely be his last.
The other reason it was a stupid question - it was asked and answered a
couple years ago when the Intel transition was announced. Again, kinda the
sort of thingy someone covering the "Apple Beat" should know.
I was actually kind of bummed out Steve didn't fry him with an iLaser on the
spot. Steve's gotten soft, man.
Bob Keefe (the infamous "sticker guy") has once and for all destroyed the adage that there is no such thing as a stupid question.
He did it with a room full of witnesses.
Yes, Virginia, there are some questions that are too lame to be asked.
then they could qualify for the free money while still not "buggering up" their
products. When you peel off the sticker that protects the screen on your
Macbook, you take the Intel sticker too.
Then again, Apple makes such beautiful packaging, I'd be a shame to see that
buggered up, too. So, I'm sure they wouldn't do it for that reason alone.
but if one really wants to talk about it then, well, apple spends a lot on design
and clean lines. Those ugly stickers would destroy that look. In which case,
they might as well not spend the money on the design and clean lines. In which
case they would make computers that look like Dells. In which case they would
be on the path to going bankrupt like the pre-return of Jobs in the nineties
beige box days. But a reporter covering the Apple beat knows all this right?
- intel inside
- by peterissorry August 12, 2007 8:56 AM PDT
- He has posted a response saying that he's actually working on a story about the
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(7 Comments)Intel Inside program, so he was probably looking for a quote. He must have
already known what the answer would be.