July 17, 2008 9:40 AM PDT

How YouTube is turning things around

I've been extremely tough on YouTube lately. About one month ago, I called for its head if Google doesn't turn things around quickly and I've also said that it's the garbage bin of the Internet. And while I still believe the second point, I'm starting to think Google is doing just what I said it should -- start working with major players and turn things around.

After it announced that YouTube would be working with Seth Macfarlane and feature his own channel, two big announcements from the YouTube camp have me changing my tune and thinking that Google may be on to something big here.

First, YouTube is coming to TiVo Series3 and HD boxes. At first glance, this deal may seem like a big deal, but in reality it's nothing more than a way for YouTube to expand its horizons and hopefully make it such a valuable attribute of set-top boxes (it's already on the Apple TV) that companies will be willing to enter sweetheart deals to have it included in their own boxes. In other words, it could have some long-term effects, but right now, it's not going to have any impact on the service's losses.

But in a far more important announcement that will have an impact on the entire service and probably have lasting effects, Google also announced that it has struck a deal with Lionsgate that will see the independent film studio enjoy a revenue-share agreement with YouTube and get a branded video channel to broadcast movie clips.

Now, the chances of this deal having a major impact on YouTube's bottom line right now are probably slim, but we can't downplay the significance of it in the long-term.

Much like the Seth Macfarlane deal, the Lionsgate deal highlights Google's intention to strike deals with major players in the entertainment industry to restore order to an outlaw site and find ways to bring advertisers to YouTube.

The main problem facing YouTube isn't that it can't get people to the site -- that's the least of its worries. Instead, Google is all too aware of the fact that monetizing YouTube and making it a viable business is not easy at all.

First off, the company is dealing with the problem of downright ridiculous videos being uploaded every day. Whether it's watching someone eat their lunch or perform a card trick, YouTube is full of crap that advertisers don't care about and simply don't want their ads running on. Let's face it, will a Dove soap commercial really work on a video called, "Fred Goes Swimming"? I think not.

Compounding that problem, there's no demographic data to speak of and most advertisers simply aren't willing to spend money on any video (regardless of relevance) if they don't know who is watching it.

To make matters worse, YouTube is inundated with copyright infringement that not only makes it a prime target for lawsuits, but makes it a thorn in the sides of major film and TV studios.

Taking all that into consideration, I still believe YouTube is becoming a valuable property. Sure, it has its problems and the company really needs to fix the copyright issue, but by striking deals with major film studios and other influential entertainers, Google is putting YouTube on a track for profit.

That said, it needs to do more.

The way I see it, Google needs to separate the crap from the quality. Instead of combining everything, Google needs to make a concerted effort to segregate the professional material from those videos that are created by the average person for the general public's consumption.

On the public's side of things, Google should simply try to sell banner ads at a high CPM and make money on the traffic. Instead of trying to find companies that would sell ads on the video, it can try to monetize it as much as possible regardless of the video's content.

Google should place all of its arrangements with professional video providers in a totally different part of the site (something much better than Channels) and do everything it can to determine demographics and sell advertising on the videos. Upon doing so, it should be able to see major revenue increases as more companies jump on the bandwagon.

And why would more companies jump on the bandwagon? Simple really: Google will use these deals to its advantage, sell advertising, and drive viewers to them by funneling its huge user-base to it. Upon doing so, it brings them to a controlled environment where advertisers have peace of mind and Google has demographic data. And once it can prove that the vendors are making money through the arrangement, more studios will come aboard and slowly but surely, YouTube's losses will turn around.

And in the end, everybody wins. The users who like to upload garbage can do it all they want and not worry about any involvement from Google. Google can get away from its issues with user content and find a way to monetize YouTube through professional videos. And major film and TV studios who have been wanting to capitalize on YouTube's traffic can finally do so after seeing how Lionsgate and Seth Macfarlane turn quite a profit with little content.

YouTube is finally turning itself around. And although this is just the first step of many and the profit potential isn't too high right now, it's making solid moves that should reap huge rewards in the future.

Want to know what Don is up to? Follow him on Twitter and FriendFeed.

Recent posts from The Digital Home
The Digital Home Video: iPhone 3G: A retrospective
Reality Check: The Seinfeld ad was superb
The Digital Home Video: Yep, Microsoft fanboys do exist
Why everyone should embrace gaming
The Digital Home Video: Frivolous lawsuits against Apple need to stop
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments
by j_a_s_p_e_r July 17, 2008 10:04 AM PDT
Youtube is so BORING. Video quality is poor. The content is poor and finding anything relavent to a specific topic is a pain. "Google needs to separate the crap from the quality" - I absolutly agree. I'd much rather watch TV shows and movies on Hulu or Joost, than watch some idiot try and get a few seconds of fame
Reply to this comment
by ripfilms July 17, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
As i agree to alot of what you are saying, I also disagree on a bunch of things too. I agree there is still a problem with copyright, and the issue is the uneducated kids who think its ok to upload anything they want. Solution, maybe a fee to upload? i also think by dividing content creators from the "junk" will cause more harm then good. You see YouTube has a community. That community built YouTube. without it youtube will be a place to go watch comercials. well thats my 2 cents.

youtube partner ripfilms. search it ;)
Reply to this comment
by selytch July 17, 2008 3:27 PM PDT
The [online] world is being dominated by large corporations. Ebay is selling off to larger retailers, Amazon is already there, now Google is heading there way. Very unfortunate indeed.
Reply to this comment
by selytch July 17, 2008 3:28 PM PDT
The [online] world is being dominated by large corporations. Ebay is selling off to larger retailers, Amazon is already there, now Google is heading there way. Very unfortunate indeed.
Reply to this comment
by LouRyder July 17, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
You seem to be confused on what YouTube really is. Why do I think this? Because you state in the eighth paragraph, that "the company is dealing with the problem of downright ridiculous videos being uploaded every day". Um, Hello! This is what YouTube is, silly.

There are plenty of video sites where people can see professional videos. Heck, if you want to watch professional stuff, just watch TV.

YouTube is FOR the ridiculous videos. Hence, their logo, Broadcast YOURSELF.

Love,
LouRyder, a "ridiculous video" uploader to YouTuber.
Reply to this comment
by NateBiggity July 18, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
If their moto is Broadcast Yourself, why do people upload videos of films and TV shows?

I think Don's blog here is getting a little off track. The biggest problem YouTube has to deal with right now is pleasing the media companies that are having their content uploaded by users. This possible deal with Lion's Gate is a good start. Everyone should upload content they have created, including both large media companies and individuals. I agree with you, LouRyder, that nobody should be concernced with how ridiculous the videos are. The better content will more naturally flow to the top, but if you still want to access something obscure, it should still be there.
Reply to this comment
by sahilk July 18, 2008 5:06 PM PDT
Ripfilms you sound like a hypocrite, on one side you say that they should charge a fees to upload on the other side you say the community created youtube um where did the community come from? From those "stupid kids" that receive 2mil+ views.. yeah if youtube started to charge it would drop in visits
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

Resource center from News.com sponsors
What you need in business class email.
Mailtrust

Click Here!
Never worry about email again. From mobility and shared calendaring to virus and spam protection starting at only $3 per mailbox. more>

Rackspace Mailtrust
Total Email Relief

We'll take care of your email so you can take care of your business.

14 Day Free Trial

With expert support 24x7x365 we guarentee 100% uptime. Try us for free for 14 days. Never worry about your email again.

Just $3 per mailbox

Choose the plan that is right for your company and only pay for what you need.

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account

Featured blogs

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • News - Business Tech

    Chrome's JavaScript challenge to Silverlight

    The advent of Google's Chrome browser, software pros say, should spur a big speedup for JavaScript, which would raise its standing against Microsoft's Silverlight technology.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week

    Here are CNET Reviews' 10 favorite items from the past week, including the TiVo HD XL, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50, and the Dish Network's newest digital TV converter box.

  • News - Apple

    Apple watchers spot 'iPod Nano' pix, iTunes hints

    The rumor mill has long been predicting a longer, leaner new version of the iPod Nano, and now it's conjuring up some pictures.

  • Outside the Lines

    EIC Squared: Chrome, iPods, and a Dell-Salesforce union

    On this week's EIC Squared podcast CNET's Dan Farber and ZDNet's Larry Dignan discuss Google's latest rocket launch--the Chrome browser--as well as Apple's iPod event next week and a Dell-Salesforce.com union.

  • Video

    Katie Couric reflects on first Webcast

    The political conventions are over and so are CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric's first series of Webcasts. CNET's Kara Tsuboi sat down with Couric on the final night of the Republican National Convention to discuss what she liked about Webcasting, some of her most memorable guests, and whether TV news will still be around by the next round of conventions.

  • News - Digital Media

    At 10 years old, whither Google?

    Daniel Sieberg of CBS News looks at how the company grew exponentially from start-up to superstar and part of our culture, but what's ahead?

  • Video

    YouTube plays party politics

    During the presidential campaigning four years ago, YouTube didn't even exist. Now it's a tool candidates must master to get their message across. CNET's Kara Tsuboi stops by the YouTube upload booths at the Democratic and Republican conventions to find out why Google's video site has such a big presence in Denver and St. Paul, Minn.

  • News - Gaming and Culture

    Are Demo and TechCrunch50 fragmenting their audiences?

    With both events scheduled to start Monday, many press, as well as venture capitalists and others are having to choose which one to attend.

  • News - Cutting Edge

    Execs predict next Google-like tech

    On eve of company's 10-year anniversary, researchers and business pundits speculate about what technologies might someday have as much impact as Google.

  • Gallery

    Images: The art of 'Spore' prototypes

    Will Wright and his Maxis team worked on dozens of prototypes to test the elements of their soon-to-be-released evolution game. Here's a sampling.

  • Webware

    Mozilla releases second Firefox 3.1 alpha

    Added features include support for a new video tag element introduced with the HTML 5 standard, along with some speed enhancements.

  • Green Tech

    Duke Energy to invest in mini solar power plants

    Can hundreds of rooftop solar panels collectively operate like a central power plant? Duke Energy launches $100 million distributed solar program to find out.