• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
April 1, 2008 8:52 AM PDT

Don't expect new HDTV technologies anytime soon

by Don Reisinger
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

Even though news sites are touting the eventual release of new HDTV technologies and calling them the saviors we've been waiting for, the simple fact is they're not anywhere close. And to make matters worse, many of these are nothing more than proofs of concept that have no marketability. In other words, don't start trashing your plasmas and LCDs just yet because they'll be around for quite a while.

On Monday, I had the opportunity to interview Bob Perry, Panasonic's senior vice president for its display division, for the next episode of my CNET Digital Home podcast. During the interview, I asked him what the future of the HDTV market looks like and what we should expect.

Much to my chagrin and certainly some of those who will listen to the interview, he said that the chances of a new HDTV technology hitting store shelves anytime soon are slim. According to Perry, we're still at least a decade away from the next real HDTV technology that could actually supplant LCDs and to a lesser extent, plasmas.

Suffice it to say, it's a sad day for those of us who want to see the next big thing.

According to Perry, the HDTV business works in ways that are much different than any other tech industry. He contends that new technologies take about five to eight years just to develop into practical use in your home and another five to eight years to come down in price far enough for people to actually buy them. And to make matters worse, the clock has only started on one technology.

OLED should be the future. In case you haven't kept up on HDTV technologies (and why would you? New ones crop up and die every week), OLED does something that no other current technology can do--it creates such a small footprint that it's conceivable that in the future, we may be able to pull our TVs down from the ceiling much like a window shade. In other words, it's extremely thin and quite flexible--two attributes that most companies, most importantly, Sony, are using to their advantage.

And while you may have heard of other technologies like laser TV and even SED, Perry contends that most of those schemes are nothing more than pie-in-the-sky ideas that have little chance of beating OLEDs to the market.

But I digress. The major issue described by Perry was not that OLEDs will eventually replace plasmas and LCDs, but that LCDs and plasmas will be around for at least another decade with not one competitor. Sure, some believe that new technologies may make it to market sooner and that certainly is a possibility, but the chances are quite slim.

But if we know that LCDs and plasmas will be around for much longer than some expected, what does the future of plasma HDTVs look like? As it stands, many companies are moving to the LCD side and Panasonic is left on an island producing plasmas of its own and supplying companies like Pioneer with its plasma technology. Of course, Panasonic did invest billions in its new LCD plant where it hopes to capitalize on both technologies, but virtually every other company is counting plasma out except the popular tech company.

The reason why is actually quite simple. Historically speaking, plasmas displayed the best picture on screens that were normally larger than about 42 inches, while LCDs performed best at screen sizes that were smaller. But in recent years, LCD technology has caught up on larger screen sizes and the cost of a 42-inch LCD is quickly beating the price of a 42-inch plasma.

And according to most industry insiders, it doesn't look like LCD's rise to the top will slow down. Realizing this, what does the future of plasmas really look like? Will it become the safe haven for screen sizes that stretch well into the 80-inch-plus range or will it quietly phase out?

So far, no one knows. But if you look at where the industry is headed and its constant attempts to reduce prices while increasing quality, the chances of plasma rising to the top are slim. That said, LCDs have never been more popular and as the costs continue to dwindle and the quality continues to rise, there's no reason to suggest we will have two HDTV technologies forever.

If I had to guess, look for plasmas to die out just before OLED hits store shelves and for both LCD and plasma to be gone in about 10 to 15 years. Until then, enjoy your current technology.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Recent posts from The Digital Home
Dolly Parton endorses IE 8 Web Slices
iTunes music library makes its way to the browser
Bill Gates' home tour on charity auction block
Universities reject Kindle over inaccessibility for the blind
EA chief: The Wii is 'weaker than anticipated'
Apple rejects Mad artist's iPhone caricature app
EA picks up Playfish for social gaming push
Sorry, kids: No social networking on the Xbox 360
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by dbargen April 1, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
As I've said before, it's for this reason that we can expect to see major price drops far beyond what we've seen in the last year or so for HDTVs. The only way to expand the market for HDTVs will be to compete and sell as many as possible. This requires more factories that can churn out displays at faster rates which willd rop prices. Add this to the upcoming 2009 digital transition, and there's a ripe market of consumers looking for affordable HDTVs.

The innovations we can expect to see over the next decade are most likely to be in design refinement and manufacturing cost efficiency. Besides that, look for different cases and new applications for this kind of product (ie. placement, grid->touch capability).
Reply to this comment
by fudgy73 April 1, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
Mr. Reisinger seems like he would be really annoying in real life and that he received his job at CNET via a "friend." Poor opinions, poor usage of English, and an ugly mug make a bad combination.
Reply to this comment
by abbottpark April 1, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
This is nothing. Wait for Ultra HD to come out. Ultra HD stands for ultra high definition. It is a prototype for a new digital video format and is also referred to as ultra high definition video (UHDV). Ultra HD is the proposed replacement for existing high definition television (HDTV).

The highest-resolution HD monitors currently available offer 1,080 lines of resolution in a progressive-scan format - also known as 1080p video. These screens have 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and are theoretically capable of displaying every pixel of the highest-resolution HD broadcasts. These sets are sometimes called ?ultra HD? as a marketing term, but in fact are part of the current HDTV standard.

True ultra HD is so named because it provides a video resolution containing 16 times as many pixels as current HD. Whereas HDTV uses 1,080 lines of resolution, ultra HD contains 4,320. Ultra HD uses 7,680 x 4,320 pixels in a widescreen aspect ratio of 16x9, making for a total of approximately 33 million pixels (33 megapixels). Ultra HD also offers improved sound quality: a 22.2 channel sound system reproduces 24 different channels of audio in three vertical layers of speakers, compared to currently available surround sound systems that use 5 or 6 channels.

Ultra HD was developed by a Japanese public broadcast company and research group called NHK Science and Technical Research Laboratories. Their aim in designing ultra HD is to present images and sound realistic enough to give viewers the sensation of being part of the scene - one reason the ultra HD format is four times as high and four times as wide as HD. One screen built to demonstrate ultra HD spans 400 inches (10,160 mm). This provides viewers with a field of view perspective of about 100 degrees, compared to 30 degrees on commercially available screens. It is due to come out first in movie theaters in about 20 years. The current HD standard was in testing since 1962 at the NHK labs in Japan.
Reply to this comment
by ggordonliddy April 1, 2008 6:53 PM PDT
Come on... why are you making personal attacks? I can understand complaints about improper English usage (though nothing egregious jumped out at me in the article), but what exactly are the poor opinions in this HDTV article?
Reply to this comment
by aubrey_q April 1, 2008 9:12 PM PDT
Part of me wants to hold off for OLED, but that will be a long wait. I may end up with an LCD. Oh, well...
Reply to this comment
by ctfoley April 2, 2008 7:36 AM PDT
oleds will come in 1-2 years. OLEDs are just so much better. the screen is one of the most important things in home entertainment, so there will be tremendous pressure to make a better screen technology. also, technology advances faster now than it did in the past, which he is clearly basing his forecast on.
Reply to this comment
by lordeagle April 2, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
The Sony Store at the Eaton Centre here in Toronto already sells an OLED TV. It's small (about 10") and expensive (about $4-5000 i don't remember which one it was)...but they're superb! Viewing angles are total, contrast is ridiculously amazing and colors kick ass. And they're expecting the larger models to crop up later this year.

The prices will drop once they begin mass production of the OLEDs... not to forget that Sony products tend to have a premium price tag.
Reply to this comment
by Mam00th April 22, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
I WANT MY LASER TV
Reply to this comment
by C433Z April 23, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
ah man, OLEDs look so good though. i've never seen one but 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio sounds amazing. I've seen a pioneer kuro and that's only 20,000:1.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

advertisement

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right