Apple rejects Mad artist's iPhone caricature app
A Mad Magazine contributor has been told by Apple that his iPhone app featuring drawings and contact information of members of the 111th Congress has been rejected because it depicts politicians in an objectionable light.
Richmond's iPhone app in action.
(Credit: Tom Richmond)According to Tom Richmond, who wrote about his app's rejection on his personal blog, his app--dubbed Bobble Rep-111th Congress Edition--in no way should have been construed as objectionable.
Richmond said that the focus of the app was to create a "database of all the members of the United States Congress which allowed the user to find the names and contact information of their senators and congressional representative either via Zip code or by using the iPhone's GPS location services." Rather than use the politicians' individual portraits, the app depicts each senator and representative in caricature form, which Richmond drew himself. All told, the app features 540 caricatures of the politicians.
Using the app, each politician's head is placed on one of 12 bodies. When iPhone owners shake their phone or flick the politician's head with their finger, their head bobbles around. As Richmond pointed out, the feature was "just a novelty, and the real purpose of the app is the database that allows you to find out who your representatives in Washington are and how to contact them."
After Apple's vetting process, however, Richmond and the others involved in developing the app learned it had been rejected.
"Thank you for submitting Bobble Rep - 111th Congress Edition to the App Store," the rejection letter from Apple read. "We've reviewed Bobble Rep - 111th Congress Edition and determined that we cannot post this version of your iPhone application to the App Store because it contains content that ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement."
Another shot of Richmond's iPhone app.
(Credit: Tom Richmond)Section 3.3.14 of the license agreement says that apps can be rejected "if they contain content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, sounds, etc.) that in Apple's reasonable judgment may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory."
Apple did not provide any more details on why the app was rejected. It also hasn't immediately responded to request for comment.
In his own defense, Richmond said that Apple's ruling is "truly ridiculous." He wrote on his blog that the "caricatures aren't mean or very exaggerated. They are simple, fun cartoon likenesses of the politicians and the purpose of the app is a informational database. There is no editorial commentary involved at all."
Then, like many of the developers who received rejection notices in the past for questionable reasons, Richmond said that Apple "should be taken to task over its ludicrous and inconsistent app approval policies."
If you want to see more images of the app, click here. After that, let us know what you think about this rejection in the comments below. Was it warranted? Were the caricatures unfair? Let's hear from you.
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
And also, it takes a special kind of jerk to express glee at others' ailing health. I hope you're proud of yourself, you gonad.
I will agree with your second point though... although, there are a great many of Apple fanatics out there who equate Bill Gates or Steve Ballmer to Satan and wish for his demise as well.
The cartoon likenesses of the politicians certain don't cast them in the most favorable light.
Especially the McCain bobblehead shown in this article. :)
The app caricatures EVERYONE IN CONGRESS, be they Democrat, Republican, or Connecticut for Lieberman.
I'm a conservative Mormon and I don't find this objectionable at all. There is plenty worse on the Tonight Show!
Stupid Apple...
Personally I think it is a slippery slope for them.
Funny the same free market capitalism that brought them success, they support the political agenda that is absolutely against that ideology.
I think this is not a good thing for Apple to invoke politics like this, they may wish to rethink this before it affects their business.
Aside from Al Gore who could be more concerned with their environmental status, can you give some examples of this liberal bias?
What "conservative" shows are you trying to claim are banned from itunes? Works of art? Prose?
So, one could test the liberal bias theory (and yes, I do think on exists at Apple, with Jobs and Gore involved, and it trickles down into hiring practices) by resubmitting the app with "nicer" pics of the dems, but without changing the repub pics.
I own an original of his of Alfred E. Neuman.
As far as the article is concerned: Apple - what is your deal?! I have an iPhone and I love it - but c'mon - this is stupid.
I'm really starting to wish I'd waited for the Pre to come out, and am developing a disdain for Apple exceeding that I have for Microsoft.
bobble-head maker for "exploitation of an individual for commercial purposes". This perhaps is the real
reason for Apple's rejection....
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/18/national/18arnold.html
..although it would naturally seem that Tom Richmond & his partner would be ultimately responsible for the content & thus any poss. litigation, Apple knows it would be a richer target.
you. It is intolerable. Honestly.
- by aeproberts November 10, 2009 12:22 PM PST
- Ridiculous.....they really need to get their process ironed out. If an app violates an existing contract stipulation, shows pornography or crashes the phone then it should be rejected, otherwise it should be released and let the market decide if it is worth having or not.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (59 Comments)