• On GameFAQs: The top 100 most popular games!
November 6, 2009 11:38 AM PST

Sorry, kids: No social networking on the Xbox 360

by Don Reisinger
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 30 comments

In the public preview of the upcoming Xbox Live update that features access to Twitter, Facebook, and Last.fm, users under the age of 18 aren't allowed to access the aforementioned social networks. Unfortunately for those users, that will still be the case when the software launches on all Xbox 360s later this year.

According to Microsoft spokesperson Major Nelson in a blog post, Microsoft made the decision to limit access to Twitter, Facebook, and Last.fm to those 18 and older because parents won't have the ability "to use Family Settings to customize which of these applications their children can access." Microsoft is also concerned with keeping the Xbox Live environment "age-appropriate."

Realizing it will be a hot-button issue for many Xbox Live users, Major Nelson was quick to point out that it wouldn't be a lasting solution. Microsoft, he said, is working on "an update that gives parents the choice of which social applications their children can access." According to Nelson, after the update is released, children between the ages of 13 and 17 will be able to access the social networks after obtaining parental approval.

So far, Microsoft has not said when the Xbox Live update will finally launch (Nelson said "soon"). The update that gives parents control over access to those social networks will be released "several weeks" after the launch of the Xbox Live update.

Let's hear from you. Do you think Microsoft should limit child access to social networks? Let us know in the comments below.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Recent posts from The Digital Home
Human rights groups: No in-game war crimes
Nintendo Black Friday: DSi with $20 in DSiware
Another iPhone worm, but this one is serious
Best Buy starts Black Friday craze a week early
Modern Warfare 2 tops entertainment industry, not just games
Wii and Wii Fit make their way to Sports Authority
Dolly Parton endorses IE 8 Web Slices
iTunes music library makes its way to the browser
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (30 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by solitare_pax November 6, 2009 11:59 AM PST
Lets see - All a kid has to do is lie about their age to bypass this, right?

I feel more secure already.
Reply to this comment
by umbrae November 6, 2009 12:45 PM PST
They would need a credit card and lie about their name. The parental controls on XBL is actually very tight.
by kaibelf November 6, 2009 2:23 PM PST
Exactly. It's easier for them to lie on a PC than on the 360.
by faceless128 November 6, 2009 2:47 PM PST
they would have to lie about their age when making their passport account. if your passport account has an age that's under 18 when you make an xbox live account that's tied to it, you get a child profile. of course, many kids realize this and put their age at 18 or older anyway, my younger brother did just that a few years ago, and my sister, who is 10 also realized this when signing up for hotmail.

also, you don't need a credit card, you can buy 12 month xbox live cards in stores, often at a $10-20 discount over the $49.95 that you would pay with a CC. it's actually best if you don't use a credit card, since using one means your subscription automatically renews every year, which can cause problems with your xbox live membership if the card is declined for any reason.
by dannyboy1016 November 13, 2009 1:16 PM PST
LOL all u got to do is go on a real pc i know the xbox is technically a pc but go on a real pc and go on any of those websites microsoft cant restrict you cuz of your age who goes on face book from a xbox!!! i only do that when im tired bored lazy or when my laptop gets broken. No offense to all the xbox lovers out there who pumps 310mill in activisions pocket just for CODWAW2 the first day of it release i mean its a good game but ill just wait till the price drops. "peace"
by Jahntassa November 6, 2009 12:00 PM PST
I think it's safer than not to automatically restrict it on accounts deemed as 'under 18'. In theory, most people who would access those types of services already have another method to do so beyond the XBOX.

The fact that they will release the parental controls for it a few weeks after is better than nothing at all. IMO it's a feature that shouldn't hold up the general release.
Reply to this comment
by b_man95 November 6, 2009 12:00 PM PST
They Really shouldn't put those types of restrictions the social networking sites. they them selves have restrictions
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor November 6, 2009 12:01 PM PST
Like most things, the rules like this only stop those people who actually care enough to follow the rules. You know...the people who would have been responsible enough anyway without the rules? The rest of them get around it and everything is all hunky dory. Of course, when they do release the updates, how long do you think it will take kids to bypass the parental controls or just pretend to be the parents themselves?
Reply to this comment
by kaibelf November 6, 2009 2:24 PM PST
It's a lot harder when the parents get a bill for xbox live gold on their credit card and want to know what it's about.
by faceless128 November 6, 2009 2:49 PM PST
why would a kid smart enough to get around their parents use a credit card for xbox live when it's easier (and often cheaper) to buy the xbox live 12 month card in best buy?
by November 6, 2009 12:09 PM PST
This is all about PR with parents. Microsoft can't go wrong taking this approach, especially if they follow up with that parental control update reasonably quickly.

What they don't want is to have a single Xbox taken out of the living room because the parents can't control what their kids do with it. Of course that perceived control is a myth, but perception is reality.
Reply to this comment
by wedgexx November 6, 2009 12:31 PM PST
They're going to add it to the parental controls within a month of release. What's the problem again?
Reply to this comment
by OfficerNelson November 6, 2009 12:41 PM PST
Something tells me that a disgruntled soccer mom with no responsibility for her child[ren] called this one.

Is it honestly that hard to hang out in the living room while your kids are staring at the TV? I only slightly understand why parents are worried about what their kids see on the internet because they can't monitor them 24/7, but even then it's pretty iffy. To claim that parents can't watch the big bright flashing square in the middle of their living room wall is probably a bit of a stretch.

Anyways, stupid idea. Why not wait until parents can choose which networks can be accessed instead of just blindly blocking them all? Is it really that urgent of an issue? Come on now.

Besides, kids are smart. I spent 2 years finding each and every hole in Websense's content filter in high school. After a while I just bought a mobile broadband card and used it on campus. (It was a boarding school, so even at "home" the internet was under strict surveillance.) Same thing will happen here. Kids will find workarounds and tricks for a while, then will just end up accessing the social networks on a computer or on their cell phones.

Bad idea, bad execution. Welcome to Xbox.
Reply to this comment
by kaibelf November 6, 2009 2:27 PM PST
Nonsense. I'm part of the preview, and the most vocal complaints are from these kids. They also whine about how MS is limiting their "freedom of speech" and talk about how they intend to make money by gaming for a living. Kids, as a general rule, are NOT smart, and honestly, if their parents are paying for this access, why shouldn't they have control over it?
by Methuss November 6, 2009 12:41 PM PST
What is the point of addign yet another social networking program to a system that already has one? (MSN messenger is built in already)

Frankly I don't want people SMS bombing my phone because they go nuts using Twitter on their XBOX...and Facebook's lax security leaves me wondering how messed up a person's system can get from that.
Reply to this comment
by raverblood November 6, 2009 12:50 PM PST
all i can say is good.. they dont need to be on there
Reply to this comment
by biffhenerson November 6, 2009 12:57 PM PST
Sounds reasonable to me. Kids have no business on the internet anyway. Its nasty and bad.
Reply to this comment
by ibeetle November 6, 2009 1:02 PM PST
So you mean to say that the online players that have said my parents were never married, that I am the product of a mother that is a female dog, and that I actively engage in same sex relationships are OVER 18?

Yea... we need to keep those immature underage kids off the network
*/ Rolls eyes
Reply to this comment
by xaduurv November 6, 2009 1:33 PM PST
I find this move from MS very strange. They're alienating their key demographic, spotty teens who play nothing but halo and call of duty (come on, you know I'm right).
Reply to this comment
by kaibelf November 6, 2009 2:28 PM PST
Actually, their key demographic is mid-late 20's. Teens don't have anything without viable incomes.
by xaduurv November 6, 2009 11:22 PM PST
You mustn't have been a teen (or have raised teens) in quite some time. They don't need incomes. They have parents. And when it comes to gaming, they can be very vocal.
by mjconver November 6, 2009 2:05 PM PST
My 17-year old son got caught up in this nanny-state stupidity. When he signed up for his Xbox account 2 years ago he was honest with his birthday, and there's no way to fix it.

He's a senior in high school, an athlete, gets good grades, has a car, and I let him and his girlfriend to go R-rated movies. I could care less what he does on his Xbox. He defriended me on Facebook months ago, I could care less, he can have his space as long as his grades stay up.
Reply to this comment
by November 6, 2009 2:28 PM PST
You are just like my mom then. She doesn't care what I do as long as I keep my grades up, since it's hard to get into lots of problems with drugs and everything and keep up good grades.
by rquinn7 November 6, 2009 9:54 PM PST
I'm with you. Our kids can be licensed to drive one ton of metal on the streets at 50 mph. Yet they are not old enough to view "age appropriate" sites? Who are we kidding here? The thing that drives me crazy, it's insidious. The Government and by extension, corporations, feel that they (derived from the vocal minority) can dictate that which for centuries has been the domain of parents. Parenting.
by 6stringluke November 6, 2009 11:56 PM PST
rquinn7,
"he Government and by extension, corporations, feel that they (derived from the vocal minority) can dictate that which for centuries has been the domain of parents. Parenting"

How many cases of violent teens blaming video games for their actions? And how many parents only too willing to shun the responsibility and point the finger at the Xbox360 in the living room?

Of course most kids are sensible enough to not take gaming seriously, but the tiny minority ruin it for everyone else. Such is the world we live in today.

The company is trying to limit their liability, No more, no less. Some parents want to be friends with their kids. Thats not parenting...
by nataliev39 November 6, 2009 2:15 PM PST
I think it is smart to limit children's use of the social networking sites. They are only limiting it until they have a proper parental control to install. this is smart on their behalf because it will save them from numerous lawsuits if a kid wan't afe about internet use and got themselves into trouble. With an age limit in place, the company is guarding themselves from the suits of overprotective parents who would do anything to sue them if their child misbehaved on the internet.
Reply to this comment
by Stefaninafla November 9, 2009 5:56 AM PST
If MS don't want their XBox Live service to be used as a conduit for underage folks using social networking services, that's their prerogative. After all, people are supposed to read the EULA before agreeing.
Reply to this comment
by shycelticwitch November 11, 2009 9:06 AM PST
GOOD! Now all they have to do is get rid of the rest of the technocrap that keeps our kids (and adults) on the sofa... scarfing junk food and getting fat. No Facebook? No MySpace? SO WHAT?!!! Get of your butt and go outside and play. You might live longer (and be a little smarter too).
Reply to this comment
by lolbrandon November 18, 2009 2:12 PM PST
I feel that the restriction for facebook, last.fm, and twitter is unnecessarily high. 18 is quite annoying in my opinion. I am 16 years old and have a facebook and last.fm. Xbox should follow the terms of service that these social networking sites use which certainly isn't 18. Having to wait 2 years to use these useful applications on Xbox is a bit of a let down. If anything make the restriction set to 16, or have a parental setting which would be good problem solver.
Reply to this comment
by Helmaroc November 19, 2009 4:52 PM PST
The age requirement for facebook and twitter is 13 years old. I don't think last.fm even has an age requirement. So why do this? I know that a large part of the Xbox Live (maybe even half) player community is under 18 years of age, and have simply lied about their birthdate to gain access to everything. And I know there are kids under THIRTEEN using Xbox Live, Facebook and Twitter. So, this is a poor solution on all counts. It does not make sense, and it will not work.
Reply to this comment
(30 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

advertisement

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right