• On ZDNet: The Windows 7 upgrade survival guide
November 3, 2009 6:51 AM PST

Dedicated tweeting gadget TwitterPeek launches

by Don Reisinger
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 27 comments
Share

TwitterPeek

TwitterPeek sells for $99 or $199.

(Credit: Peek)

A new gadget designed specifically for people who want to tweet on the go was launched Tuesday by gadget maker Peek.

The device, dubbed TwitterPeek, does one thing and one thing only: it lets people tweet. It doesn't access e-mail. It doesn't make phone calls. It tweets. That's it.

TwitterPeek, which looks like a smartphone, features a QWERTY keyboard and comes in black or aqua blue.

The idea behind TwitterPeek is simple. After buying the device, users need only to input their Twitter credentials to get going. The gadget lets them tweet, reply, retweet, send direct messages, and download followers. It supports one account at a time. Users can also view TwitPics by clicking the "view content" option from the TwitterPeek menu. The company claims its battery lasts three to four days with average usage.

Included in the price of TwitterPeek is a service plan. According to the company, users can access Twitter nationwide through Peek's own "mobile network," which accesses mobile-phone networks. If users choose to pay $99 at the time of purchase, they will get the TwitterPeek device and six months of Peek service. After that, they need to pay $7.95 per month for network access. If customers plunk down $199, they'll get the device and service for the life of the product. In either case, TwitterPeek allows for unlimited tweeting.

It makes sense that a device designed exclusively for Twitter would come from Peek. The company already offers the Peek and Peek Pronto, which are designed exclusively for mobile e-mail and text messaging.

But TwitterPeek, while an interesting idea, will need to convince consumers that it's really necessary in the marketplace. There are a slew of mobile apps that allow people to tweet while they're on the iPhone, some BlackBerry models, and Android-based devices.

It's also debatable whether even the most ardent Twitter users will want to pay $199 just to have access to a tweeting gadget. Evidently, the gadget was built for people who don't have access to mobile Twitter apps. It may also be useful for people who access Twitter from their mobile browser; that experience tends to yield more headaches than value when people want to post a quick tweet.

If you're interested in picking up a TwitterPeek, you can buy it exclusively on Amazon.com for $99 or $199, depending on your desired service plan.

But will you? Let's hear it in the comments below.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Recent posts from The Digital Home
Nielsen: Viewers watching video content all over the place
Play the Nintendo 64 in portable form
Report: Video games possibly coming to Redbox
Game developer: Wii has 'a lot of substandard software'
With CrunchPad dead, the Web reacts
Human rights groups: No in-game war crimes
Nintendo Black Friday: DSi with $20 in DSiware
Another iPhone worm, but this one is serious
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (27 Comments)
by lavachickie November 3, 2009 7:26 AM PST
Oh hell no.
Reply to this comment
by 1970Wagoneer November 3, 2009 7:29 AM PST
Wow...really? We have reading devices exclusively for storing thousands of books (noble), we have cell phones that can do just about anything and everything we would want it to, all in one device (handy), but a device for $200 that can just tweet? I will be extremely disappointed in society if this takes off.
Reply to this comment
by November 3, 2009 7:46 AM PST
LOL are you kidding me? You can get an iPhone for $99. I'd be surprised if this thing sold more than 1000 units.
Reply to this comment
by jtoast November 3, 2009 7:59 AM PST
Yea but can you get the Iphones service plan for $7.95/mo? I know I'm paying close to $100/month on a two year contract to be part of the Iphone users group.
by jlt0x November 3, 2009 8:11 AM PST
Believe it or not, there are quite a few people who don't have or want the iPhone. So none of those "apps" really mean anything to that set of consumers. There are people that post tweets every 5 minutes of their day. This device lets them tweet anywhere w/o a mobile phone or the expensive data plan.

I have a feeling that Peek will eventually release a device that will allow you to only text, e-mail, and Tweet. All for sub-$10/mo service plans.
by cdotspace November 3, 2009 9:26 AM PST
jlt0x - OK, maybe if it allowed text, email and tweeting but JUST tweeting? I agree with 1970Wagoneer: I will be extremely disappointed in society if this takes off.
by solitare_pax November 3, 2009 9:27 AM PST
You can do a lot with the iPod Touch that you can do with an iPhone - That would be a better alternative than this dedicated device that will wind up with the other must-have gadgets in some forgotten drawer.
by mamann November 3, 2009 8:04 AM PST
I'm so very confused. Is there anyone in the world that would own this before a cell phone? If you can tweet, follow, and remove following all from your cell phone with a simple text message; where is the value in this product?
Reply to this comment
by ravenshuman November 3, 2009 8:09 AM PST
Possibly, just possibly, they could find a niche market with older folks that are phobic of integrated gadgets but want to dip a toe into the social networking pool. (Sort of the tech equivalent of a gateway drug.) But as a viable, growing market? Nope. And I'm speaking as someone who does carry multiple gadgets (because I hate the still camera in my phone and I love my FlipVideo).
Reply to this comment
by DnetMHZ November 3, 2009 8:09 AM PST
Sad, just sad.
Reply to this comment
by noesnoesnoes November 3, 2009 8:15 AM PST
If you were sensible, you'd buy a decent Android phone for free and pay a monthly plan.. Then you'd get Internet, phone calls, texts, navigation, apps and.... yes.... you'd also get Twitter.
Reply to this comment
by insomnislacker November 3, 2009 8:20 AM PST
Why isn't this called a Peep, or Tweep. I guess they can't call it Cheap, though.
Reply to this comment
by jeffyablon November 3, 2009 8:51 AM PST
Seriously, about the stupidest thing I've seen . . . today.

Can't wait for tomorrow, though!

[CNET editors' note: URL removed]
Reply to this comment
by November 3, 2009 9:27 AM PST
@jtoast "Yea but can you get the Iphones service plan for $7.95/mo? "

Seriously? $7.95 a month to be able to do type short text msgs? LOL! Yeah that's the same.

@jtox "Believe it or not, there are quite a few people who don't have or want the iPhone. ...There are people that post tweets every 5 minutes of their day. This device lets them tweet anywhere w/o a mobile phone or the expensive data plan."

Do you really believe that those folks that are that addicted to Tweet do not already have a mobile phone? All I'm saying is why spend a$100 for a device to Tweet when you already have the ability to do so on your mobile phone?
Reply to this comment
by acezsoft November 3, 2009 9:28 AM PST
Are you kidding me? The Motorola droid will be less expensive than that! Also, now users need to carry one more device around besides their phone. I don't see it happening.

Bryan
http://www.acez.com
Reply to this comment
by inachu1 November 3, 2009 9:32 AM PST
My plan:
Do not buy this.
Purchase Ooma for free telephone service.
Save $200 a month by canceling my iphone service!
YAY!
Reply to this comment
by justin76here November 3, 2009 9:35 AM PST
This is STUPID! I have a Peek Pronto (email/texts) for $19.95 a month. If you have this, you don't need a TwitterPeek. There are websites you can sign up at to send and receive Tweets from your email. TwitterPeek is a waste of money. When the Peek company comes out with a mobile web device, then I'll pay attention. BTW, I do not recomend the Peek Pronto, the device is a piece of garbage and the service is sketchy from time to time.
Reply to this comment
by missilesilo November 3, 2009 10:50 AM PST
I don't know why people are bashing this device. I canceled my iPhone service because it was too expensive. I was paying $90 a month for cell phone, internet, and texting. With this device, I would pay $200 and no more monthly fees. This device lets you send and receive messages from anywhere, through twitter, without paying a monthly service fee. IMO that is a good deal. Instead of people texting you, you can tell them to tweet you or send a direct tweet.
Reply to this comment
by mikemc3 November 3, 2009 10:55 AM PST
Are you kidding me!! With Cell Phones, Netbook and about a billion other devices that have Internet access Amazon has the nerve to try to milk the Kindle craze by selling this worthless thing.

Only thing that makes this sadder, there will be consumers (suckers) that will actually buy this.
Reply to this comment
by mikemc3 November 3, 2009 11:01 AM PST
Really funny scenario...like all things Internet the Twitter FAD runs it's course. People move on. Twitter eventually close's it's doors. That's $200 of wasted money.
Reply to this comment
by SurferGeekGirl November 3, 2009 12:28 PM PST
The worst part is, this company treats us like we're stupid or something. Why in gods name would we need a device to do only one thing in this digital environment we're living in? The Peek is irrelevant. Obviously it gets a big FAIL from me.
Reply to this comment
by manalagi001 November 3, 2009 2:37 PM PST
Jumping the shark.
Reply to this comment
by November 3, 2009 4:16 PM PST
Really? Wow. Who the hell would buy this thing? If you have money for this, and you tweet, you probably have the bucks for a cellphone and a decent text messaging plan, so you can do your twit-stuff that way. This is probably going to end up on the Top 5 dumbest gadgets.
Reply to this comment
by shiningdevil November 3, 2009 6:08 PM PST
*loses it* Oops.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (27 Comments)
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

advertisement

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right