September 16, 2009 10:03 AM PDT

Dan Brown book selling better on Kindle than hardcover?

by Don Reisinger
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 20 comments

The Lost Symbol

The subject of much debate.

(Credit: Amazon)

Best-selling author Dan Brown's latest novel, "The Lost Symbol," is apparently selling better on the Kindle than in hardcover on Amazon.com.

In Amazon's overall sales listing, Brown's book is listed as the best-selling title on the site. But that listing includes both the book's hardcover version and the Kindle version.

On Amazon's Mystery and Thrillers page, the two versions are independently listed. At the top of that list is the Kindle version for $9.99. In the No. 2 slot is the hardcover version offered for $16.17. That list is updated hourly.

Blog site The Kindle Nation noticed the phenomenon early Wednesday morning.

As of late morning, the Kindle version is still atop the list. That said, it's important to note that this is one store. The hardcover version is still tops at rival Barnes and Noble, which also sells a digital version.

Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment and exact sales figures.

The possibility that the Kindle version of "The Lost Symbol"--which follows Brown's wildly popular "Da Vinci Code" and "Angels & Demons"--is outselling hard copies on Amazon could be a monumental moment in the e-book industry. Prior to the release of the book, its publisher, Random House, was mulling the possibility of not even releasing a Kindle version. Eventually, the company relented.

Dan Brown

The Kindle version is leading the way on Amazon.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

Random House's aversion to releasing a version for the Kindle e-reader was apparently rooted in its worries over "security and logistical issues." This underscored what has become a battle between publishers and Amazon's Kindle that mimics the battles Apple was forced to deal with when iTunes and iPods were under attack from the music industry.

But if the likely biggest book release of the year sells better on Amazon's Kindle than in hardcover in the massive online bookstore, that's undoubtedly big news for the publishing business. Companies that were suspect of Amazon's potential dominance in the space might realize the value of offering e-books on its device.

Amazon itself hasn't confirmed that more Kindle copies of "The Lost Symbol" have sold and it's possible that the Kindle version is only leading the pack for now, but it's still a significant event that could send shock waves through the publishing business.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Recent posts from The Digital Home
Modern Warfare 2: Most pirated game of 2009
Should 'nerd' and 'geek' be condemned?
Mom calls cops for help with son's gaming addiction
BioWare: Japanese RPGs don't get American audiences
Maine to consider cancer warnings on cell phones
Imagine November without Modern Warfare 2
Microsoft to fix Zune HD censoring issue
Apple files patent to provide 3D realism
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by cvaldes1831 September 16, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
It's also possible that Amazon.com has doctored the search results to drive sales of the Kindle reader hardware. I wouldn't put it beneath those guys.
Reply to this comment
by ittesi259 September 16, 2009 10:45 AM PDT
Besides being unethical, any proof of such a thing would lead directly to tons of lawsuits for false advertising and business practices.
by dowell100 September 16, 2009 2:23 PM PDT
Amazon.com has unilaterally deleted e-books purchased by others from Kindle's, so we can easily assume Amazon.com is an unethical company.

Amazon.com is being sued. However, more needs to be done, such as an investigation by relevant Federal authorities. They are out of control in many areas.
by dr_when September 16, 2009 10:42 AM PDT
The publishers may also want to consider that if Dan Brown and other authors sold books on Amazon for the Kindle only and not paper versions, they would not need publishers. I am sure the amount they make on a paperless version is more than what they make from a publisher of printed versions (kind of like the music biz). Plus the greenies would be happy for all the trees saved.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight September 16, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
The real value of a publisher is the promotion that lets someone like Dan Brown get discovered. Perhaps the future role of big media is goign to be as agents. Perhaps scaled back from the days of old but a needed service.
by cvaldes1831 September 16, 2009 2:38 PM PDT
Renegade Knight is correct. It's the same thing with the major labels in the recording industry. The value of the big industry players is the promotional aspect: book tours, interviews on talk shows, album tours, getting on Saturday Night Live. Stuff like that.
by ittesi259 September 16, 2009 10:46 AM PDT
My question is will this make the publisher want to do more e-books? I don't own a Kindle or other reader and I don't know the cost sharing deals between publishers and Amazon...but one would think sending an electronic file to Amazon is ultimately cheaper then taking the time and expense of printing the hardback....would that not likely equal more profit for the publisher?
Reply to this comment
by dr_when September 16, 2009 10:48 AM PDT
That is why my point is that the publisher serves no real purpose nor adds any value.
by dowell100 September 16, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
No, Amazon will kill the book industry, and that's one of the things that makes them dangerous. Their marketing does not mean more profit for publishers.

Book publishers are able to publish lots of books that don't become best-sellers because of profits made from the best-sellers. When you suck all the profits out of hardback best-sellers, there is no capital to invest in other worthy books that will not get blockbuster circulation. Amazon is just creaming the good stuff and that puts the entire publishing industry at risk.

Publishers are essential. A book distributor like Amazon is not essential. There are many great ways to distribute a book without giving Amazon the right to sell a book $19.96 less than hardcover, then Amazon taking 65% of that $9.99. It's insanity.
by ibeetle September 16, 2009 10:49 AM PDT
The publisher never had any problem selling a ebook reader version of the book. The publisher was concerned that Amazon did not have the rights to distribute a digital copy of the book. The book was available for pre-order on the Sony ebook store weeks ago.

As far as this sales ranking these numbers do not surprise me. Brick and Mortar stores such as Borders, and Barns & Noble had Midnight release parties, major major discounting equal to Amazon and author signing appearances.

High sales rankings for the ebook version is strictly because of availably. You want the Kindle version you have to go to Amazon. You want a eBook version you have to go to Sony. You want a print edition... pretty much every retailer from Walmart to Borders to A&P has it. Make no mistake about it the electronic version will sell but the print edition will out sell it 100 to 1.
Reply to this comment
by DRTigerlilly September 16, 2009 11:03 AM PDT
here's a thought and correct me if i'm wrong...could this be due to the iphone's kindle app?
Reply to this comment
by BelowTheRoot September 16, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
...or because everyone that wanted the printed version preordered months ago, while the Kindle version was just made available?
by Zoobie September 16, 2009 1:29 PM PDT
Yeah--I doubt many people "pre-ordered" an electronic version, so all those pre-orders probably aren't counted for the hardcover. Having said that, I saw the book at Walmart for $17 and got an e-mail from Sony that has it for $9.99. I mostly download classics on my Sony reader, but that $10 price point is low enough that I'll go out and buy the e-book version.
by Nancy_Nally September 16, 2009 11:59 AM PDT
Below the Root nailed it...all the Kindle sales are happening at once, in a short time frame post-release, whereas the hardcover sales were spread out statistically by the ability to preorder it.
Reply to this comment
by sodapop2k9 September 16, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
LOL - another "look at my feet" article by the masterminds at CNET... For USA users of Amazon there are at least 3 "buy it on Kindle" messages on the Amazon page. The hardcover is unavailable on Amazon. And marked as an import. http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Symbol-Dan-Brown/dp/0385504225

Plus the kindle price is half that of the paperback. Rather soon the kindle sales will reach critical mass.
Reply to this comment
by sticks1839 September 16, 2009 12:52 PM PDT
You do realize that you link to the hardcover book page for Lost Symbol. It is "In Stock" and "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com." The other editions available include an "Import" version of the hardcover sold by 3rd parties. Notice the different cover artwork. US users can certainly buy the hardcover from Amazon.

Now there are numerous ads for buying on the Kindle, but that's just advertising by Amazon and makes sense, even if it is a bit much.

Lastly, the paperback is more expensive than the hardcover...very strange.
by SactoGuy018 September 16, 2009 1:42 PM PDT
I think the publishers will need to consider ebook versions of their novels because of one device: Apple's much-rumored tablet computer, which will likely have a screen good enough to become a decent ebook reader.

I would not be surprised one year from now Amazon will offer a Kindle application designed specifically for the Apple tablet computer, and that would really drive up ebook sales (Apple could offer a deal with Amazon.com where an ebook purchase through the iTunes Store will essentially be buying from the Amazon.com Kindle store). It would be even MORE interesting when you can use an extended version of iTune's LP feature to have the Audible.com audiobook version during audio playback show the pages from the ebook version at the same time (not far-fetched since Amazon.com owns Audible.com).
Reply to this comment
by cvaldes1831 September 16, 2009 2:44 PM PDT
There's already a Kindle app for the iPhone so it would not be far-fetched to imagine a Kindle app one day for this rumored tablet.

However, the biggest problems with reading e-books on the iPhone/iPod touch is A.) the readability in direct sunlight and B.) short battery life due to the energy requirements of the backlight.

Kindle is a better e-book reader because the screen technology is different and optimized for e-book reading.

The phantom Apple tablet will likely have a screen that is similar (technology-wise) to the iPhone and thus not optimal for e-book reading.
by SactoGuy018 September 16, 2009 2:54 PM PDT
@cvaldes1831, I'd almost agree but unlike the iPod touch or iPhone, the screen on the Apple tablet is supposed to be around 10" (diagonal), which is quite large and means far better readability compared to the iPhone screen. And Apple will likely offer LED backlighting for this 10" screen, which means reasonable battery life since LED's use far less power than florescent backlit LCD panels.
by cvaldes1831 September 16, 2009 7:37 PM PDT
The size with a 10" tablet isn't the issue; it's plenty big. The iPhone/iPod touch screen simply isn't all that great for extended viewing under direct sunlight. If Apple uses similar technology but a larger size, that's not going to change.

LED backlighting is not a panacea since the iPhone and iPod touch already feature it. If you never dim the display, trust me, the battery will run out quickly. Trust me, I have two iPod touches. While the tablet would have a larger battery, the screen is also larger, so there would be no vast improvements in terms of battery performance.
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Digital Home

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Digital Home topics

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

Don's links
Don's Facebook account
Don's Twitter feed
Don's Friendfeed account
Don's Google Reader account
Don's Last.FM account
Don's Pownce account
Don's Flickr account
advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right