• On mySimon: Magno Wooden AM/FM Radios
July 17, 2008 4:20 PM PDT

Earnings: Microsoft and Google disappoint, while IBM soars

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

If there's a recession on, you would hardly guess it from the earnings reports from Microsoft, Google, and IBM. In terms of revenue, Microsoft beat Wall Street expectations with an 18-percent rise to $15.64 billion over Q2 2007. Yet the Street pummeled Microsoft's stock by 5 percent due to lowered guidance for the year and lower-than-expected profits, hinting at problems in the company's newer businesses like online and XBox.

In sum, Microsoft's old businesses (Windows was up 15 percent, Tools, etc.) are thriving, but it can't seem to get a foothold in the new world, with its online services business scraping to a $488 million loss. Its Office business also grew two percentage points slower than expected (14 instead of 16-percent growth), but this is probably a momentary blip compared to the continued costliness of trying to break onto the web in a meaningful way and owning the family room with the XBox.

Meanwhile, Big Boring Blue (IBM) boosted its profits by 22 percent over 2007 and revenue by 13 percent, bolstered by IBM's growth in emerging markets.

Revenue in the Americas, IBM's biggest market, rose 8 percent, or 6 percent adjusting for the impact of the weak dollar. Sales in its Europe and Middle Eastern sales region grew 20 percent, while sales in Asia climbed 16 percent. The company, like other tech giants, has said it expects overseas strength to compensate for a weak U.S. economy.

IBM is the trusted grandfather figure in an iffy economy, a vendor that may be overpriced but is also very safe.

And Google?

Well, Google seems to be suffering from the sheer magnitude of its promise. The company grew revenue by 39 percent over 2007 to $5.37 billion, but Wall Street punished its stock by over 10 percent in after-hours trading largely due to a marked deceleration in its paid clicks growth (20 percent, down from 30 percent in Q4 2007 and 45 percent in Q3 2007).

In other words, Google also suffers from the vulnerability of the larger advertising market, even as it takes a growing share of that market. Right about now, Google might be praying for a monopoly that is more dependable than its online advertising monopoly...like Microsoft's desktop dominance. Google is selling what everyone should have; Microsoft is selling what everyone already does have...but could use a little more of.

IBM? It's trying to reshape the world in America's image, one server and consultant at a time.

Regardless, despite Wall Street's judgment of the three companies, all are doing quite well. It's impressive to see companies as big of these grow at such significant percentages.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
The 'wisdom of crowds' loses steam
Microsoft's embrace of MySQL could kill it
Apple: 'Enterprise' is as enterprise does
Theory of competition fails in open source, elsewhere
Microsoft's Web business spurring development of IE
The case for the open-source Goliath
Netherlands' open-source policy goes double Dutch
Why is Google Android beating Symbian?
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by alegr July 17, 2008 9:56 PM PDT
I fail to see how IBM's 13% growth means it "soars" while Microsoft's 18% is "disappointment".
Reply to this comment
by Matt Asay July 18, 2008 6:21 AM PDT
It's the trajectory. And I wasn't making a value judgment: I think Microsoft's growth was impressive, as I said. It was Wall Street that didn't agree with us.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

E-tailers linked to 'scam' blame customers

Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right