• On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
July 8, 2008 6:37 AM PDT

Shuttleworth: Desktop Linux can be better than the Mac

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

Mark Shuttleworth addresses a range of interesting things in a recent interview, but there are two, in particular, that strike me. First, Mark acknowledges the obvious: The Mac is a superior usability experience. Second, however, while placating his upstream developer communities, he also notes that improving on their work is going to be critical to beating the Mac:

Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, has historically been very, very deferential to what we call our upstream communities - GNOME, KDE, and so on - in the definition of the desktop experience. Our view, very strongly, is that they hold the real expertise in defining that. And that, as a distribution, our primary job is to be a very efficient conductor of their good work into the hands of users....

Because we've increasingly been engaged in the definition of the desktop experience for some of these consumer electronics products, however, we're now in a position to actually start engaging with those upstreams and investing in that desktop experience....

And so we started to build out a team that will focus on the specific user experiences..., and our goal, very simply, is to make sure the Free software ecosystem can deliver a Mac OS-like experience, or an experience that will compete with the Mac OS. We see Apple as the gold standard of the user experience. We believe that, while it can be a challenge, the innovation inherent in the Free software process can deliver an experience that is comparable and in many ways superior.

Mark is a wonderful diplomat, but I'm glad to see that he also recognizes the deficiencies of his upstream communities, even if he would never articulate it like that. Put baldly: The upstream developer communities that he references are developer communities, often without the expertise or interest in developing an average user-focused experience.

To beat the Mac for usability, the emphasis can't be on developers. It has to be on users. Too often open-source developers forget the user. I'm glad that Mark has not.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
At its best, is open source unbeatable?
Your new software vendor? Domino's Pizza
The 'wisdom of crowds' loses steam
Microsoft's embrace of MySQL could kill it
Apple: 'Enterprise' is as enterprise does
Theory of competition fails in open source, elsewhere
Microsoft's Web business spurring development of IE
The case for the open-source Goliath
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by dehall622 July 8, 2008 7:43 AM PDT
the biggest difference in user experience in my opinion is the hardware support.... linux is missing drivers for certain hardware; this is impossible with mac since the hardware is probably hand-picked by jobs himself
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 8, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
OS X does an excellent job of insulating end users from the back end of the OS by limiting what they see and can do. Sure, they can go into a console and do everything there, but I would wager most OS X users don't even know what is under the GUI and they don't need to.


*nix is great for developers and geeks. That's where it has its following. For people who don't care about the tech geek side of it, OS X does the job. Different products for different people. There really is no need to compare them.

Reply to this comment
by The_Decider July 8, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
Too bad you don't know that Linux is as easy to install and administer and can look as pretty as OSX. I realize that clicking 4 or 5 buttons is challenging for you but install openSUSE 11.0 and see for yourself.
by kiwibuntu July 8, 2008 1:31 PM PDT
Mark Shuttleworth is bang on here. The linux experience will only be great, as opposed to adequate, if there is the honesty to recognise what needs fixing. As long as open source communities can manage that, they will probably be unstoppable in the long run. And OS X is not a solution for everyone who doesn't want to use Windows. Only open source software and commodity hardware can provide genuinely cheap computing to the masses.
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider July 8, 2008 3:02 PM PDT
Ubuntu, while miles ahead of Windows is a garbage distro that exists as hype only. There are distros that can give OSX a run for their money in any category you want to choose.
Reply to this comment
by dneary July 9, 2008 2:55 AM PDT
Hi Matt,

The GNOME community (at the heart of the Ubuntu user experience) has been focussed on the user experience and our vision of universal access for many years. That vision has been guided by a motto - "we are not our users" - and the guiding principle that we want to make our technology available to everyone - through beautiful, usable, integrated, accessible, localised applications.

Your prejudice that "upstream communities are developer communities", and thus cannot be user-oriented, is really quite insulting to a community which has embraced companies engaging the community, and community members with a wide range of skills, including many usability experts.

Dave Neary.
Reply to this comment
by Matt Asay July 9, 2008 9:50 AM PDT
I didn't mean to be insulting, Dave. Having used GNOME off and on for nearly five years, however, I can't say that I'm impressed with the result. I wish I could say otherwise.
by Leslie Satenstein July 9, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
Re Desktop Linux and the alternatives. At work I use XP, and at home I use Linux. From a user interface, I find Gnome under Linux to be superior to XP with the single desktop view.
On the otherhand, for the very large set of functionalities, the winner is XP.

That said, I am certain that Linux (and the Mac) are eroding the market that Microsoft owned. One reason is that Vista arrived too early on the scene, when the anticipated hardware hardware upgrades lag Vistas resource demands. People want to keep pcs for the same duration as they want to keep their cars.

Now, where Linux is taking off is in governments, non-USA countries, and in technical areas where Microsoft costs are dibilitating (small PDA's, cell phones and the like).

Open source will also force Microsoft to react with downward setting of prices, or else further provide the implementation advantage to Linux.

Leslie Satenstein
Reply to this comment
by batitombo July 10, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
Hmm, there some things that linux can't deliver yet!! Audio software, good midi, and the Number of visual editing apps... So.... Mac OSX it will be quite difficult to "beat". Apart from developments in business is another challenge
Reply to this comment
by jharrop2 July 11, 2008 12:12 AM PDT
Nobody has mentioned the impact Compiz [1] might have on the user experience?

Obviously, it is just one aspect of an overall user experience, and as aspect that Apple could presumably adopt if they envied it, but still ...

[1] http://compiz.org/Home/Screenshots
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right