• On TV.com: Sexy summer bodies photo gallery
June 25, 2008 5:13 AM PDT

Microsoft promises to deliver interoperability documents by March 2009

by Matt Asay

Microsoft has been slow in complying with the US Department of Justice's 2001 order for Microsoft to provide documentation on how its programs interoperate, but it's now promising to have them delivered by March 2009.

Whatever. It has taken Microsoft many years and it still can't - or, rather, won't - provide documentation that it must already have internally?

Come on, Microsoft! Many software vendors would like to see their applications - open source and otherwise - work even better on Windows or with Office. This intransigence doesn't just hurt you. It hurts your would-be partners. It hurts your customers. Start acting like a grown-up that can share the sandbox.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from The Open Road
What soccer team would your company be?
Open-source licensing: Your mileage may vary
Open source to shape cloud computing, but not dominate it
Off-topic: Why can't I have this job?
Legalized drugs, now open source. Those crazy Dutch!
Will 'good enough' virtualization topple VMware?
Linux community codes around Microsoft's FAT patents
As Mozilla 'upgrades the Web,' Microsoft must upgrade its pace
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by orcmid June 26, 2008 1:05 PM PDT
Uh, Matt, the documents you are talking about are new system (overview) documents that were added to the 41,000 pages of technical documentation that have been available since September 2007 and are now available for online, public download. The first overview document was introduced at the same time, and the expanded set is a result of review of the overview drafts. These system documents are very important, even though the need was recognized very recently, but this does not mean there isn't substantial material already available.

Finally, this has nothing to do with what would have been internal documentation, if any. This kind of documentation is only needed to support external interoperability and usage of protocols. If there was anything internal, it was probably used up in the 5,000 page original technical documents made available in 2002.

Finally, the APIs necessary for operating application on WIndows and in Office have been available for years and continue to be available as part of the standard MSDN on-line documentation. There don't seem to be any API compliance issues at this time. It is all about communication protocols used among products.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right