Linux developers petition for open Linux kernel drivers
Insisting that they have "repeatedly found them to be detrimental to Linux users, businesses, and the greater Linux ecosystem," today the Linux kernel community has started petitioning for open-source modules and open-source drivers for the Linux kernel.
Such modules negate the openness, stability, flexibility, and maintainability of the Linux development model and shut their users off from the expertise of the Linux community.
The Linux Foundation, led by Jim Zemlin, has issued a statement in favor of the Linux kernel developers' position. It's unclear why the kernel developers decided to speak out now, though the Linux Foundation indicates that the developers have been subjected to a steady barrage of questions on the topic for years. Apparently, they finally got sick of it.
It has been a long time coming. I wrote about closed-source device drivers for Linux back in 2002 [PDF]. Even then the idea of marrying proprietary device drivers to an open-source kernel was blasphemous to some, though it was also the only reason others were willing to engage with Linux. Some hardware companies persist in believing that their device drivers must remain closed for competitive advantage. It is unclear as to why....
Regardless, this statement from the Linux kernel developers arguably won't change much, but at least it signals an influential community's preferences. Will the hardware manufacturers listen?
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
"Insisting that they have "repeatedly found them to be detrimental to Linux users, businesses, and the greater Linux ecosystem," today the Linux kernel community has started petitioning for open-source modules and open-source drivers for the Linux kernel."
So, as I understand what is written, you are saying that the Linux kernel Community is campaigning for Open Source Modules and Drivers because they are detrimental? Are you sure that it isn't closed source ones that are detrimental?
You then go on to comment, presumably again about the Open Source modules and Drivers "Such modules negate the openness, stability, flexibility, and maintainability of the Linux development model and shut their users off from the expertise of the Linux community." You would have presumed that this would be the case made against closed source modules, wouldn't you?
I think you have had a bit of a problem with editing this article.