And the fastest browser is...
Which is the world's fastest browser? According to Zimbra, Safari runs fastest, though it didn't beat out Firefox by much. Both Safari and Firefox were roughly twice as fast as Microsoft's Internet Explorer 7.
Of course, Zimbra was testing for how these browsers perform with the Zimbra Web application. Your mileage may vary with other applications. In fact, I'd love to see a wide range of tests for different sites and applications. Who's next?
As an aside, I continue to be impressed at how Zimbra treats non-Microsoft platforms as first-class citizens (along with Microsoft). Firefox is the same way. Both allow you to run on the Mac, for example, without losing any functionality that you'd find in Windows/IE.
It's called great code. Weak developers write code that limps on anything but Windows. Great developers write code that ports well to diverse platforms.
- Topics:
-
Development,
-
Industry news
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us



Zimbra is fortunate to be in a position where they can develop with multiple platforms in mind, but for companies where the time and money just isn't there then they have to get it working for the majority, and that majority is on IE.
People get real, do you think Zimbra is going to do tests for every browser out there? They will only consider those with an acceptable share.
Don't forget Opera pioneered tabbed browsing and mouse gestures - so its not just another browser!
And the fastest browser I currently use is Camino - a Mac-only browser. Beats Safari hands-down...
JT
http://www.FireMe.To/udi
Not gonna read the article.
- If Opera is faster than Safari - and in my experience 9.5 is - then a statement that Safari is the fastest should have the disclaimer that this is among the browsers tested. I mean if e.g. I tested two gas-guzzling SUVs and said one of them had the best MPG of all cars I would be ridiculed for not considering other cars.
- How did people come to the 1% market share number? Was it the OneStat numbers? On mobile phones the share is way higher, but I guess those do not count. For some sites Opera also masks as other browsers in order to compensate for stupid authors who insist that browser detection is the way to go - those accesses will not be counted as Opera. But hey, I can turn off caching if it can help to show more Opera hits to sites...
My unscientific impression is that it's pretty equal with FF3 , beats the pants off IE,
much depends on the website.
BTW, amen to Nunya's comment below. Anyone developing websites with IE only specific code should be banished.
Please discontinue writing articles in the future, especially about programming quality and porting to "diverse platforms", when clearly you have no idea what a compiler is.
"@ woderaider, Actually Opera's first release used MDI (Multi-document interface), not tabs. Also there were browsers before Opera that used tabs, such as InternetWorks by BookLink Technologies 1994."
actually Opera always had true MDI, right to now, version 9.5, not the dumbed-down Tab UI. Tab UI is just a poor-man's MDI with constantly maximized windows. And Opera has true MDI first, and it also has Tabs first, since you can maximize all the MDI windows, and have the window titles listed in a bar selectable at the bottom, which means Tabs (albeit at that time the word "tab" still means something different from now). Even right now Firefox still doesn't have true MDI, as there's no way to un-maximize the tabs into windows and view them side by side.
So Opera has MDI first, and it has tabs first (you have to customize it first though), it just doesn't have a more restricted, less free, Tab UI, and it still doesn't have it, as it doesn't dumb down its true MDI. InternetWorks had "tabbed" windows, but the "tab" in this case is something completely different from the idea in our modern Tab UI.
-
by manishkshwh
June 23, 2008 7:41 PM PDT
- Yeah I found the same thing while testing it on different Platform....
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 26 Comments >>