• On TechRepublic: Why Linux will triumph over Windows
June 16, 2008 12:55 AM PDT

Microsoft Project replacement tops 500,000 downloads (UPDATED)

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 4 comments

While perhaps no indication of what these companies are buying, it's still interesting to discover that Bank of America, Hewlett-Packard, General Electric, IBM, Siemens, Toshiba, Honeywell, and Nortel have downloaded and installed Projity's OpenProj, an open-source replacement for Microsoft Project.

They're not alone. As Projity CEO Marc O'Brien recently told Linux.com's Tina Gasperson, 500,000 individuals have downloaded OpenProj to date.

Perhaps most intriguing in all of this is that Projity knows which companies have downloaded and installed its software, since it can't get that information from Sourceforge, from which individuals download the software. (It could, of course, be the case that each of the companies noted above is a paying customer, but since several of these are unlikely to serve as public references....) I'm guessing that Projity has some sort of a "call home" feature in its project, or perhaps a simple web bug that registers with Projity each time a page is refreshed.

If the latter, it becomes doubly interesting when you consider Projity's license: CPAL. In this case, CPAL might prohibit users from removing the very web bug that Projity uses to track their use of the software.

Marc or someone else care to comment on how the tracking is managed? I'm sure a range of open-source companies would love to learn who is using their software, provided it doesn't abrogate a user's control of their privacy.


UPDATE: Marc O'Brien, CEO of Projity, emailed me to clarify the privacy issues I raised above:

I was disappointed you choose to raise issues that are erroneous and really counter productive for the open source success of OpenProj. ALL companies mentioned and all companies that we know are using OpenProj and Project-ON-Demand have provided us with their contact information. We do not know of ANY company using OpenProj or Project-ON-Demand who has not proactively given us their contact information.

Thanks for the clarification, Marc, and congratulations on getting these exceptional customers. That says a great deal about the quality of the software.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
At its best, is open source unbeatable?
Your new software vendor? Domino's Pizza
The 'wisdom of crowds' loses steam
Microsoft's embrace of MySQL could kill it
Apple: 'Enterprise' is as enterprise does
Theory of competition fails in open source, elsewhere
Microsoft's Web business spurring development of IE
The case for the open-source Goliath
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by nekosej June 15, 2008 6:52 PM PDT
When you first run OpenProj, you are asked to voluntarily provide an email address to receive the OpenProj newsletter. That's how we have an idea who is using the product. I'm afraid it's not so intriguing after all...

Howard Katz
CTO Projity Inc.
Reply to this comment
by Matt Asay June 16, 2008 5:03 AM PDT
This is true *if* when they give you that email address they also tell you it's OK to publicly disclose them as a user of the software. There's a difference between me giving you my email address, and me telling you that you can tell others I'm using the software. If you get this approval in the sign-up screen, then that is a fantastic PR/marketing move, one that others should emulate (I mean that sincerely).
by sjsilverman June 16, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
It's sad that sensationalist, idle, and incorrect speculation can be passed off as journalism (or whatever this blog is supposed to contain) these days. I would have hoped that CNET had higher standards. Wouldn't it have made sense to contact Projity for a comment before publishing the innuendo, rather than publishing first, then allowing them to respond?
Reply to this comment
by akiba_freak June 17, 2008 12:09 AM PDT
It's a blog. It's meant to be opinionated. Otherwise, it would be just another bland news site. Also, Matt quickly rectified the misunderstanding. You should appreciate the publicity of landing in an open source news site with high traffic.

Chris Wang (Akiba)
Freaklabs Open Source Zigbee
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right