May 20, 2008 12:45 PM PDT

Initiative pushes enterprises to share code, fight disease

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • Post a comment

Stuart Cohen at Grand Central Station in New York.

(Credit: Matt Asay)

Most of the software in the world is written by enterprises that never intend to sell it. They write it for internal use.

Think of all the good that would come by sharing that code between enterprises with similar needs. Think long enough and you'll come up with Stuart Cohen's Collaborative Software Initiative (CSI).

CSI hit the news this week for some intriguing work with the state of Utah, which promises to deliver the world's first open-source infectious disease management system and break down the walls between enterprises to introduce a new era of sharing code.

At least, that's the promise. It starts with one state. Where it goes next is what CSI (and open source) is all about. According to CSI's statement:

The disease management system, which is being piloted in Utah this month, will be adaptable in all 50 states and available under an open-source license later this year. It is designed to support local health departments in the detection and investigation of individual cases and local clusters, while simultaneously meeting the state and federal needs of outbreak control, disease surveillance and epidemiologic research.

More than 100 people are contributing to the project. The core team consists of 15 members, including doctors, nurses, epidemiologists, and IT managers in Utah. The open-source software being used to build it includes Novell Suse Linux Enterprise Server, PostgreSQL, Apache HTTP Server, Apache Tomcat, Java, and JRuby.

The system and database are sitting on servers managed by Utah's Department of Technology Services and are accessible to all of the state's health departments.

This is what open source should be about: not petty bickering, but rather solving big problems with a collaborative approach. Cohen recognized while heading up OSDL that collaboration needs a coordination point, which CSI is providing to Utah and to a growing number of other organizations (as yet unannounced, but I know from talking with him and from elsewhere that they're in process).

Think of how much money organizations could save by pooling resources, and how much better software would be.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
Canonical shines its Ubuntu light on consumers
Open source became big business in 2009
Will we see an open-source IPO in 2010?
Could Apache keep Google's regulators at bay?
Red Hat's Q3 earnings defy gravity
Canonical's opportunity to simplify Ubuntu
Google--not necessarily 'more open than thou'
Is it Ballmer's fault?
by seanupton May 20, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
This model should work for industries where there is much duplicative need, but little competition. The public-sector is a no-brainer. So is health care. I think fundamentally, local media companies need to shift to this model. I work for a large metro newspaper, and we are approaching much more open-source in traditional IT these days, though we've been using F/OSS in web publishing for almost a decade. A collaborative model, possibly partially negotiated with an intermediary might be beneficial to local media companies that have similar needs but rarely compete outside of certain geographic boundaries. Consolidation of newspaper companies is still too closed to support the kind of innovation needed in the newspaper business, though it does support cost-cutting. However, cost-cutting isn't enough. Something like resource pooling and classic risk/idea sharing makes sense for these types of businesses.
Reply to this comment
by seanupton May 20, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
This model should work for industries where there is much duplicative need, but little competition. The public-sector is a no-brainer. So is health care. I think fundamentally, local media companies need to shift to this model. I work for a large metro newspaper, and we are approaching much more open-source in traditional IT these days, though we've been using F/OSS in web publishing for almost a decade. A collaborative model, possibly partially negotiated with an intermediary might be beneficial to local media companies that have similar needs but rarely compete outside of certain geographic boundaries. Consolidation of newspaper companies is still too closed to support the kind of innovation needed in the newspaper business, though it does support cost-cutting. However, cost-cutting isn't enough. Something like resource pooling and classic risk/idea sharing makes sense for these types of businesses.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right