• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
April 3, 2008 5:58 AM PDT

Linux desktop market share is up as much as 61 percent, study finds

by Matt Asay

It's possible that the Linux desktop will never be anything more than a fad among geeky enthusiasts. If so, a growing swell of people appear to be much more faddish of late, as numbers from W3Counter.com appear to indicate.

Looking at the data, Linux clearly has a ways to go. But consider just how far it has come:

Linux went from 1.25 percent in May of 2007 to 2.02 percent in March of 2008. That is 61.6 percent increase in market share in nine months. [Put another way,] that is 82 percent annual growth in installed computers.

These numbers don't match up with similarly gathered data from Hitslink, which has Linux market share still hovering around 0.61 percent market share. But even Hitslink shows strong growth over time: 41 percent-plus growth since May 2007.

It's not a perfect way to measure adoption. It's highly fallible. But one thing does seem clear to me from the data: Linux on the desktop is growing. It may only be growing within a small class of users, but it is growing. But if my grandma can use it, perhaps that "small class" will grow, too.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
Mobile: Still waiting to see what sticks
Google privacy controls: Most people won't care
Amazon's move mocks EU's fear of Oracle
Skype to open-source far too little
The difference a few years makes to open source
Novell cuts 3 percent of its workforce, plus benefits
Data's one-two punch in open-source business models
Open source as an antitrust strategy
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by tuxperson April 3, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
I live for the day when "grandma" is no longer the stereotype for the clueless, dimwitted end luser who needs a computer that is as simple as a touch-tone phone. OK, so it was you real grandma- it's still a lame stereotype.

I also live for the day when big publications like CNet actually publish informative articles. This isn't even piffle- it's piffle light. How many ways are there to measure market share? Here's a few ideas off the top of my head, and I'm not even an elite CNet tech "journalist":

- Tier 1 vendor OEM sales (Dell, HP)
- Major vendors like Novell and Red Hat
- Smaller independent vendors, such as Emperor Linux, ZaReason, and such
- Download statistics from the major distributions
- Surveys that attempt to sample how many Windows and Apple PCs are re-purposed to Linux, or use multiboot/virtual environments

Come on Mr. Asay and CNet, you can do better. A whole lot better.
Reply to this comment
by whogrant April 4, 2008 12:13 AM PDT
tux - this is a blog post, not an article so lighten up. If there was a well defined way to measure Linux usage everyone would be hanging on its publication every month, but there isn't. To quote Matt "These numbers don't match up with similarly gathered data from Hitslink" and "It's not a perfect way to measure adoption. It's highly fallible". So what do you want from Matt to be happy - a 200 page research document on Linux market share as a blog post?
by Trickmyster April 4, 2008 9:48 AM PDT
I live for the day when people like you finally shut the hell up and jump off a cliff
by Papa Chango April 3, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
Asus sold about 300,000 EEE's with Linux pre-installed and have plans to sell another 2,000,000 of their next batch (where the media claims that the newer EEE will be 60% WinXP, the message is that that paltry 40% represents 2,000,000 units), so there will definitely be an increase in those stats in 12 months.
I stay away from numbers which have no meaning ("we sold 3 widgets last year and this year we increased sales by 4,000%") other than to make yourself feel good. I'm more impressed by how many companies are now selling computers with Linux distros.
Wasnt it just recently that we were all excited that DELL launched their IdeaStorm?
I agree with Tuxperson that stats are worth the value you want to assign to a certain methodology and its flaws.

I know how many installs go on at our LUGfests and on my own I must have Linuxified over 25 work related PC's and about another 80-90 on my own (50 were for a retirement home) and about half of them are dual-boots because of games and that one killer app.

But the amount of non-tech people who now are aware that there is something called Linux out there is totally different from 2 years ago. LOTS of people didnt want to chuck out their single core CPUs to upgrade to a 'new' OS. and people started learning,. For the ones that need convincing, my "here are some Linux eye candy" routine is very popula ;-).

Slowly but steadily the desktop problems have been fixed and web experience makes OS agnosticism possible for many casual users. "Old" people can use it with no problem too. (I have no problem with 'grandma' since it usually is someone from a generation removed from computers like my mother was. Her first foray onto a computer was on PCLinusOS. She has loved it so far. My dad switched because he had read about open source and Shuttleworth and the principles behind FLOSS)
Now, its the turn of the low end PC's to come to mass markets with the EEE, Everex and other brands. This is were the real numbers are. I think support for those people will be critical for desktop acceptance to move forward.
Reply to this comment
by Alex_nb185 April 3, 2008 7:10 PM PDT
tuxperson.. uh ya.. I am using Leopard and Ubuntu right now so don't say it is because I don't have a clue. But after reading your article. I would say you are the definition of freetard
Reply to this comment
by Dachi April 3, 2008 7:46 PM PDT
Grandma??

Linux has never been, and likely never will be a product designed for grandma. Grandma would require her own personal administrator and with modern uptake in PERSONAL COMPUTING this is something we are clearly moving away from and not to.

If anything Linux will grow slightly from the hard core religious Linux sector more into the general geeky and power user population.

There are /many/ geeky/power user people using Linux today (thats me), but many of them are only using it as a secondary OS.

Additional Linux growth starts with these people, not with grandma.
Reply to this comment
by worldjude April 3, 2008 10:10 PM PDT
/dev/kickstorytoface


thx.

pwnt.
Reply to this comment
by whogrant April 4, 2008 12:28 AM PDT
PS: I collect statistics on five blogs with Google Analytics - my theory is Linux users surf just as much as anyone. My blogs range from local news and information, economics, technical stuff to a blog about working in a retail store. I'm the only Linux user I know who visits any of these blogs but my statistics are specifically included. Yet they all have between 2 and 5% of visits (not page views) from Linux users. Apple runs from 6 to 16% - where Linux usage is lowest so is Apple usage. Browser market share of 2% to 5% feels like where Apple was a few years ago - I'm hopeful this is an indicator of things to come because anecdotally I have had many friends buy Apple machines in the last year or so. I think mostly they have done it because they are tired of Windows, and as the only highly visible alternative are "Apple curious" - there are nice Apple stores and they have good publicity, marketing and PR so they just go for it. I suspect that free software will ultimately be the real driving force towards Linux - when you are buying a $200 ultra-mobile PC for surfing and a bit of document access it is just crazy to spend hundreds of dollars on software suites from Microsoft, Adobe and others. If your system comes preloaded with everything you need who cares what the OS is?
Reply to this comment
by moldyjello April 4, 2008 6:04 AM PDT
Linux desktop use is definitely growing. However there is still a few hang ups that need to be fixed before it will go completely main stream.
Reply to this comment
by 3v1n0 April 4, 2008 5:43 PM PDT
Well, I trust more on W3Scools stats and they show a better value than this one... Btw In last months the linux share has improved: is thsi thanks to eeePC? I guess it has helped!
Reply to this comment
by tuxperson April 9, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
whogrant, this is more than a blog from some random person riffing out random thoughts. Mr. Asay is professional- he gets paid for this. He does tech reporting and claims all kinds of journalistic and tech creds. The whole article is a waste of space that says nothing. It's perfectly reasonable to expect more than "here are some admittedly bogus numbers that I will build an article on." It's useless, and it's reasonable to expect a higher standard. Especially on this particular subject, which has long been rife with specially-massaged studies and statistics designed to support a foregone conclusion. A real reporter tries to get behind the bushwah and publish the truth.
Reply to this comment
by tuxperson April 9, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
ps- those of us who have been in tech for many years, and thus have a real-world view of what businesses and home users are doing, don't buy the reported numbers, and are tired of seeing the same old garbage recycled endlessly.
Reply to this comment
by mmmna April 23, 2008 8:23 AM PDT
Vistabomination isn't working very well on my stepsons PC, too slow, too difficult to use. More, despite the PC being sold with Vistabomination, it even says on a sticker the manufacturer put on it that this PC would run up to 2x faster with XP.... The kid wants XP for WoW, so I have to find a legitimate CofA and EULA so I can install XP. Then I have to get XP versions of all the drivers for the mobo, the graphics card, the pointing device, the sound system, the modem, the nic or the wireless dongle...

I haven't had driver problems in my last 3 distributions of Linux. I have driver problems for EVERY version of Windows.

More, with websites that are created by M$ BackOrifice or other M$ pwned web tools, the client user experience is usually restricted or even totally locked to using M$ Interknot Exposer of some modern version, thus forcing users to invoke a browser user agent hack to even visit a website. Using the statistics of visiting browsers agent declarations could be a faulty way of gaging the quantity of installed Linux userbase.

Never had a W3C verified site fail to accept my Linux browsers. Many a W3C tested website uses Interknot Exposer specific constructs. It would seem that M$ sets defaults and assumes everyone will be borg.

Simply put, accurate figures are hard to obtain, but declaring Linux as being something grandma cannot use is discourteous - discourteous to grandma! I know of several people whose middle aged parents (these people are the age of grandparents, I simply am unaware of there being grandchildren - is this important?) that tell of setting up a computer using Linux and the 'older' people are quite happy. I know people older than my 50 years that are proficient at using Unix, is that an important difference? BTW - at 49, I was a step grandfather - is that not the same as a grandma?

Registered Linux user #260423
Reply to this comment
by kickback999 September 14, 2008 5:46 AM PDT
My is like 70 now she has been using the latest pc's since the great Atari ST came out.
When her new laptop arrived about a year ago with Vista on she said
"This vista is the biggest load of bollocks I've ever seen"
She has been using Fedora ever since.
Reply to this comment
by IG-87 August 18, 2009 8:14 PM PDT
Yet another (but hopefully accurate) source for y'all

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8

I hope Linux increases coverage... by a lot. Personally, I am typing this comment with my desktop xubuntu box, I wiped Vista from my HP pavilion dv2 netbook/notebook, and my brothers have also their laptops AND desktops with Linux. All of them Ubuntu/xubuntu/kubuntu, and linux mint (based on ubuntu). Linux owes quite a bunch to Ubuntu+its derivatives. Why? because ubuntu makes it an easier way to have much more things in one place. For instance, the ubuntu repositories (add/remove), synaptic package manager, and tons of things made to be compatible with x/k/ubuntu.

I must agree though, they need to fix many things still (they're getting there fairly fast), it doesn't come without its bugs.
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right