January 24, 2008 11:28 AM PST

Survey finds that Microsoft's Sharepoint support = rubbish

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

I guess it's true that you often get what you pay for. In the case of Microsoft Sharepoint, Microsoft sells licenses. That's pretty much all its users get. Info-Tech reports that some users are waiting up to six months for Microsoft's technical support team to resolve issues with the product. Six months. 180 days. A very long time to wait for a usable system.

Info-Tech surveyed 258 Sharepoint customers to see what they think of Microsoft's fast-growing product. A large majority are happy with Sharepoint's functionality and total cost of ownership. Nearly 25% say its support, however, stinks.

It turns out that customizing Sharepoint is a big problem for CIOs. Managing Sharepoint implementations, which often grow like a weed, is the other biggie:

One of the largest consulting firms focused on Microsoft technologies said SharePoint sometimes leads to management as well as technical challenges. Larry LeSueur, vice-president of infrastructure technology solutions at Avanade Canada, said many companies are looking at the Microsoft product as a collaboration aid without knowing what they're getting into. "The No. 1 question I get from CIOs about Sharepoint is how to get it back under control because it's been implemented at a departmental level."

According to the survey, Microsoft's technical support team is not the best place to seek help, given the relative lack of understanding of the product among the technical support workers. This could be because Microsoft's Sharepoint documentation is so poor. Both, however, are also likely due to the fast-paced adoption/growth Sharepoint has had.

I think Sharepoint is a decent product in an incredibly important sweet spot for content collaboration technologies. Were it released by a smaller company, it wouldn't have a chance. But with Microsoft's reach it has gone far in a short period of time. In so doing it has awakened the content management community to a gaping void in its offerings: collaboration and ease of use. Sharepoint is super easy to use compared to a Documentum or Filenet.

As for its shortcomings, it's interesting how they map against open-source content collaboration solutions like Alfresco and MindTouch. Open source companies don't have the problem with poor support - it's their business so customers who call tend to speak to the developers who wrote the product, not a junior technical support "engineer" whose understanding of the product comes from reading about it in glossy magazines.

It will be interesting to see how the weed (Sharepoint) competes against the community (Alfresco, MindTouch, Drupal, etc.). Short term, Microsoft is tough to beat. Long term...?


Disclosure: I work for Alfresco, the open-source alternative to Sharepoint, and advise MindTouch.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
An application war is brewing in the cloud
2010 the year of cloud-computing...M&A
Canonical shines its Ubuntu light on consumers
Open source became big business in 2009
Will we see an open-source IPO in 2010?
Could Apache keep Google's regulators at bay?
Red Hat's Q3 earnings defy gravity
Canonical's opportunity to simplify Ubuntu
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by gdeckler January 31, 2008 11:54 AM PST
Truly, there is no "?" with regards to SharePoint versus the open source community. I am a veteran of a fair number of content management products ranging from OpenCMS to DotNetNuke and even my own custom content management systems. While I cannot claim to know all of the 1,200+ CMS's out there let me just say that SharePoint is essentially the death knell for most of them. With so many CMS's the mind share around any single platform has been diluted and in the end SharePoint will be ubiquitous. Sure, some open CMS systems will live on, but relatively few as compared with today and in very niche areas. In 1994 there were dozens and dozens of email systems that one encountered. Beginning around 1996, the number has slowly dwindled until there are really only three major email systems used within the enterprise, Exchange, Domino and GroupWise and GroupWise is a very distant third.

Now, that being said, I will be the first to admit that Microsoft's SharePoint technical support has its challenges; I have had two run in's with them and not had satisfactory results either time. But that is the case with all new products, not just Microsoft's. In 1996 Microsoft Exchange support was pretty thin but today it is very good. Long term, SharePoint support will be excellent. The secret to SharePoint today is to engage a qualified partner that knows the product. And other content management systems are not really all that much better. Books on OpenCMS for example are extremely poor and support is essentially non-existent other than searching the Internet. And it is going to only get worse for the small open source niche CMS players like Alfresco, MindTouch, Drupal, etc. because they won't be able to build, maintan and grow a truly world class support organization with the 3 people that are going to be running their software in a couple years.
Reply to this comment
by PerryRogers August 27, 2008 3:21 PM PDT
Today I found two SharePoint bugs, and read about a third online. But I cannot report any of them to Microsoft, because they have no channel for bug reports, except the paid product support that requires hundreds of dollars of fees to a credit card upfront. What manager in his right mind will approve spending hundreds of dollars to report Microsoft's bugs to Microsoft? Especially as I've already found and documented workarounds for these for our use? I would like to report the bugs and workarounds to the manufacturer (Microsoft), but there is certainly no reasonable way to justify our paying hundreds of dollars to report them. Surely they are at some competitive disadvantage, not having any bug feedback channel from users...
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right