Firefox, Mac OS 9, and the power of open source
Despite the occasional usability snag, one of the very best things about open source is the diversity of development "itches" that can be "scratched," to use Eric Raymond's parlance. This is borne out in the news that the popular Mozilla Firefox browser has been ported to the Mac OS 9 platform.
Classilla Logo
According to the project developers, however, it also "establishes a template for other free open-source projects to follow," namely "By putting the ability to maintain our own software in our own hands, as users of classic Macs, we ensure that OS 9 will continue to survive."
In other words, Classilla demonstrates what open-source software has long allowed: developers and users can take their fates into their own hands, rather than being overly reliant on a vendor.
So, if you're feeling ambitious, join the effort. Or you could instead contribute to the Firefox port for the Amiga (Amizilla). You have nothing to lose but your chains (and quite possibly your sanity).
Follow me on Twitter @mjasay.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay. 





No, Classilla isn't tech for tech's sake, having to buy new hardware to support the lastest software is. As is vice versa (having to use newer software to operate on the latest hardware). People with decade old hardware and software to run on it do occationally use the Internet. That Internet experience isn't possible without new browsers, though.
Prolly get fired now.
- by leamanc--2008 July 17, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
- Classilla is not a port of Firefox. It is a fork of the last Mozilla build that was available for OS 9. In terms of the Gecko layout engine, security, and feature-set, it is roughly equivalent to Firefox 1.0. Actually, that's being generous, as by the time Firefox hit 1.0, its code base had diverged significantly from the Mozilla suite, but it's close.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)I can understand the attraction of running old OS's. Back in the OS 9 days, I kept many old machines around running System 6 up through various OS 8 versions. But to say that these are capable production machines in this day and age is quite a stretch. The software support has long since vanished, it uses an antiquated networking stack (streams vs. traditional TCP/IP sockets with the god-awful OpenTransport hack on top of it), doesn't have protected memory, doesn't do WPA WiFi security, and on and on and on.
If you want to play around with OS 9, or even put it to use for a specific task, I can see your point. But to pretend that the arrival of "Firefox 1.0" for the OS suddenly makes it a relevant, usable production OS on par with Vista, OS X, Ubuntu or Fedora, is quite laughable.