As chip sales plummet, which software vendors will survive?
The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) is now projecting that global chip sales will drop 21 percent in 2009, reflecting a souring view since its last projection in November 2008, according to The Wall Street Journal. Fewer chips means fewer new servers and fewer personal computers sold, which is consistent with IDC's report of a 25-percent decline in server sales in the first quarter of 2009.
Against the backdrop of these hardware declines, which software vendors are best-positioned to withstand CIOs' spending frigidity?
Recent earnings reports from Novell and from Red Hat suggest that Linux and open-source vendors may clean up even as spending gets chopped.
Indeed, Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst has suggested that the darkened economy spells "light" for Red Hat:
Our value proposition is even more compelling in a challenging economic environment, and we believe that's a key driver to our solid financial results and market share gains.
IT departments woke up on January 1, 2009, almost certainly looking at shrinking IT budgets but a continued need to make themselves useful to their enterprises. Enter open source, with its nonexistent (at least initially) license fees and try-before-you-buy mentality, which is precisely the right message for a down economy.
I work for Alfresco, an open-source content management and collaboration company, and advise over 10 open-source start-ups, including MindTouch, Volantis, SugarCRM, JasperSoft, Openbravo, and others. Across the board, the sour economy has been a net positive for the open-source companies with which I'm familiar, with pipelines growing by a factor of three in many cases, albeit with longer than usual sales cycles.
The question for companies that peddle proprietary products is whether they can replicate the ease of adoption that open source affords. Oracle has gone a long way toward this by making its products available to developers to download and try for free, but some companies still have yet to find a clue, as Cloudera CEO Mike Olson discovered recently with GitHub.
The market has tightened considerably, and is likely to get worse. The software vendors that can deliver superior value at a lower cost and less hassle will win in this environment. This should bode well for open source, but open-source companies still have their work cut out for them to come out ahead.
Follow me on Twitter @mjasay.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay. 



IBM, Microsoft, Oracle and other major players that are considered foundational.
Let me tell you the Company's that should be worrying:
Redhat, Novell, MindTouch, Volantis, SugarCRM, JasperSoft and Openbravo to name a few.
BTW, when I check Net Applications, I'm seeing Linux to be at .99%. Of course, this only reflects Internet-connected machines, but I would tend to expect standalone Windows systems to be proportionally lower than standalone Linux machines. Doesn't mean I'm right, but that's my opinion.
Apparently, Brandon LeBlanc started the 96% rumor which, according to the author of the above-linked blog (Joe Wilcox), is the correct figure for the United States. Worldwide, however, the percentage is lower; I'm seeing 80% or less in Wilcox's blog, and 75% in another. 75% is lower than 80, so that works for me. Cheers!
"[of approximately 160 Million (~16% of all computer users) visitors to sites per month] if Microsoft?s TechNet web site is included (which may or may not be the case, but a Microsoft logo is part of a rotating list of logos displayed) then you would expect it is likely visitors to that site tend towards using Microsoft operating systems."
http://www.itwire.com/content/view/25361/1141/
Contrarily, if the user forums for every Linux distro out there were added (assuming none are on there already) there would be a bias towards Linux which would have to be discounted.
Approximately 1% is also the most conservative estimate with the median (depending on source) being ~2%.
Yes, Linux is small-time on the desktop, yes it still needs a lot of work but a little objectivity never hurt anyone (except those with vested interests).
Just a thought. What do you think?
- by santuccie June 6, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
- Actually, I may have read that too quickly. The site says they "classify 430+ referral sources identified as search engines." That sounds like they're just looking at cookies. My mistake.
- Reply to this comment
-
(19 Comments)