• On mySimon: Victoria's Secret Vanilla Orchid
March 24, 2009 3:47 PM PDT

Microsoft's many open-source faces

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

Microsoft is a very big company, so perhaps it's not surprising that it hasn't been able to articulate a coherent message around open-source software. While the Redmond giant has largely distanced itself from earlier criticisms of open source as "anti-American," "a cancer," etc., it struggles to present a coherent, consistent face to the open-source world.

This isn't just true in Microsoft's criticisms of open source, but also its praise.

On the one hand, Microsoft has put TomTom, a major GPS device maker, on the defensive by suing it over patent infringement, including claims against TomTom's use of Linux. Two weeks later, Microsoft released !exploitable Crash Analyzer, an open-source security assessment tool.

This falls in the same week that a book was released by a senior Microsoft intellectual-property attorney highlighting the machinations Microsoft engineered to get around the GNU General Public License in its controversial patent covenant with Novell.

A week later, Microsoft launched Web App Gallery, a service that makes it easy to deploy a range of open-source content management, gallery, wiki, and blogging tools. Almost in the same breath, Microsoft is urging open-source vendors to not promote their cost advantages and instead focus on value, a competition that Microsoft presumably feels it can win.

And now Microsoft has published an official position paper on its open-source views, which says lots of happy things about open source, while cautioning that open source isn't a panacea.

What the !%!%!% is going on? Has Microsoft listened to itself lately?

Of course it has. Microsoft is simply going through growing pains as it learns to adapt to the open-source friendly world in which it lives. Any big company will both compete with and collaborate with open-source software, and Microsoft is no exception. What we're witnessing is the natural inconsistencies made public through Microsoft's efforts to get open source right.


Follow me on Twitter at mjasay.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
Why Microsoft should open-source Internet Explorer
Eclipse tells ex-community director to 'go away'
Open source: No vow of poverty (or get-rich-quick scheme)
Twitter needs a pretty face to beat Facebook
Handbrake 0.9.4: Your best deal on Black Friday
At its best, is open source unbeatable?
Your new software vendor? Domino's Pizza
The 'wisdom of crowds' loses steam
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by t8 March 25, 2009 12:06 AM PDT
If they could Microsoft would destroy all open source. Of course they cannot, so they have to play along with it so as to not be left behind. So they are forced to tolerate it. What ticks them off the most is when competitors launch products using Free Open Source that competes with their stuff. Tom Tom is an example. In this case, they will use FUD. They don't like competing with companies that re using a percentage of free code. It's just not fair says Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
by bjorn_ragnar March 25, 2009 1:51 PM PDT
Microsoft has som very clever PR people and they know how to "leak" news to media outlets. Could this have anything to do with TomTom joining OIN I wonder?

I had to read the MS White Paper three times and it was unbearable every time, made me feel dirty or sick or both, I guess.

My soul has scares from TSR programs, DOS busy flag, GetMessage and DispatchMessage and what have you.

I'm done with this. Joel Spolsky has written very well about Microsoft, being a former Microsoftie, and I will not repeat it here. Let me just say that Microsoft is completely, utterly irrelevant.

Peace,
Björn Sveinbjörnsson
Software developer.
Reply to this comment
advertisement
Click Here

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right