• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
January 27, 2009 7:07 AM PST

Who has cash to survive the downturn?

by Matt Asay

The Financial Times points out that many technology companies are cash-rich and intend to stay so in order to ride out the recession. Apple sits atop nearly $26 billion in cash, while Microsoft keeps $19 billion in its pocket (and is probably grateful that its bid for Yahoo was declined, given how that would have decimated its bank balance).

Surprisingly, IBM is relatively cash-poor, with only $3.3 billion in the bank, and Oracle? Well, let's just say Oracle needs its acquisition strategy to start feeding it fat profits because its bank balance is $700 million underwater.

As for open-source companies, Red Hat holds roughly $677 million in cash, and another $450 million in short-term investments and receivables, which compares favorably to its proprietary peers, when considering the small size of its employee base and funding requirements. Novell is much the same, while Sun Microsystems has more cash on hand but also bigger outlays it must service.

Private open-source companies demonstrate the biggest, if diffuse, saving power. My own company, Alfresco, has much of its venture capital investment dollars still in the bank, allowing us to ride out the recession, while companies such as Hyperic, SugarCRM, and others share this fiscal prudence.

When the recession recedes, and it will, those with cash will be best-positioned to manage their options. For the big technology companies, there will be greater leeway to take risks on research-and-development investments and acquisitions. For the smaller companies like mine, well, we'll have the option to grow at our own pace rather than having to sell to a larger company simply to finance operations.

In this economy, cash brings peace of mind, but it also brings options. Ironically, given that Apple and Microsoft have two of the biggest cash hoards, it may well be that money earned on the desktop will provide these vendors the best options for extending that dominance to the cloud.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
When open source isn't (open enough)
SAP wants an open Java process (pot, meet kettle)
Google shifts software value to operations, away from IP
Mobile: Still waiting to see what sticks
Google privacy controls: Most people won't care
Amazon's move mocks EU's fear of Oracle
Skype to open-source far too little
The difference a few years makes to open source
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Mr. Dee January 27, 2009 8:50 AM PST
"Ironically, given that Apple and Microsoft have two of the biggest cash hoards, it may well be that money earned on the desktop will provide these vendors the best options for extending that dominance to the cloud."

and it burns you doesn't it?
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor January 27, 2009 9:09 AM PST
How's Google doing for cash?
Reply to this comment
by CDubber January 27, 2009 9:18 AM PST
Apple sits on a pile of cash while sales continue to do well.

Every dark cloud has a silver lining. In this economy, that silver lining is Apple. Too bad their stock price still doesn't reflect it.
Reply to this comment
by ScottRiqui January 27, 2009 9:19 AM PST
Google is at about $11 billion as of the end of 2008.
Reply to this comment
by jonathan0766 January 27, 2009 9:40 AM PST
Not sure where your numbers are coming from but they're way off. Oracle's balance sheet as of December 1st was holding $7.35 billion in cash and $3.3 billion in short term assets. IBM is sitting on $12.9 billion in cash as of January 1st, 2009. To note, IBM has been holding at least $10 billion in cash + short term assets for at least four years now. RedHat is sitting on $529 million in cash and $238 million in short term assets as of December 1st. Yahoo Finance and Google Finance both spell out these same exact numbers pretty clearly in the balance sheets for the latest quarterly data.
Reply to this comment
by p-brane January 28, 2009 12:17 PM PST
Matt, could your #'s actually have been this far off?
by Waam January 27, 2009 10:07 AM PST
As a shareholder of Microsoft stock I am continually puzzled why Microsoft is fighting battles it knows it will lose. Zune? Why? HD DVD? Why? MSN? Why? I'm still keeping my fingers crossed on XBOX, but it looks like now they will never catch Nintendo, and PS3 still is a sleeping giant. Why can't they just focus on what they are great at, marketing their OS to business and making Office the best product it can be? Please focus your company and make my balance sheet recover! I don't want to cut my losses because I feel if Microsoft can just focus on what it's good at, this is a stock worth keeping.
Reply to this comment
by Millerboy January 27, 2009 10:43 AM PST
Zune is for Microsoft to learn how to develop music management software, and integrate it into their smartphones (i.e. Microsoft Windows Mobile). HD-DVD was to spite Sony's Blu-Ray and hurt Sony as a corporation. Sony and Microsoft are competing in the video game industry. MSN is for the internet and it is related to software, the internet is definitely going to be another market to sell software as services in the future. Xbox is a smart move because it provides a foot in the door for putting MS software into the living room. After all, the video game console might be the most important entertainment device of the future. Not to mention the fact that the video game industry is bigger than Hollywood, in terms of revenues and profits. Microsoft sees an opportunity for revenue growth, the Xbox 360 is doing fine, and I wouldn't get too scared of the Wii. The Wii tapped new markets, children, parents, and grandparents. The Xbox 360 and PS3 are competing in the same demographic: hardcore gamers, male, age 16-35. The X360 is kicking ass right now.

Microsoft should learn from Zune and MSN to find new ways to improve their software. First, MS should integrate their MP3 player into their smartphone OS. The gadget world (cell phones, PDAs, mp3 players, etc.) is heading towards convergence. Sooner or later, the MP3 player will be assimilated into cell phones. It's only a matter of time. The device of the future is a smartphone.
by Millerboy January 27, 2009 10:54 AM PST
For what it's worth, this is a direct statement from Microsoft?the crux of last week's Financial Times story was not found in a direct quote, but rather in a section of analysis. Says the FT:

"[The future of the Zune] lies in planting the software and online service linked to the player in other devices."

Given that music phones have long since come of age, such a strategy?whereby the Zune is a software platform primarily intended for the multitude of Windows Mobile handsets?would make sense. But for now at least, the standalone Zune seems to have some time left.

Source: http://i.gizmodo.com/5130915/microsoft-denies-reports-that-zune-hardware-isnt-long-for-this-world
by dragonbite January 27, 2009 10:11 AM PST
So Proprietary vendors have less cash on hand, but more cash coming in while open source has less coming in but less going out.
Reply to this comment
by pentest January 27, 2009 10:36 AM PST
If MS had succeeded in acquiring Yahoo, they would be sitting on no cash, and their stock would be worth less. They would have been in really big trouble. Serious trouble today.

Yet Ballmer, the mastermind behind it isn't standing in line at the unemployment office.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right