• On ZDNet: Why I Will never buy a Mac
December 10, 2008 6:37 AM PST

Microsoft approaches an open-source epiphany

by Matt Asay

I read with interest this account of the Microsoft Platform Strategy Group's efforts to steer the Redmond giant toward a more conciliatory approach to open source. One paragraph, in particular, struck me (emphasis added):

[Microsoft senior director Bob Duffner] stressed that Microsoft by no means wants to promote the use of open-source software to its customers, and still thinks its own software is superior. However, embracing open source is about giving customers and developers the chance to make their own decisions about which software to buy, and making sure both Microsoft and open-source software can be part of the same buying decision, Duffner said.

Perhaps someone should remind Duffner that by promoting its own software to customers, Microsoft already is promoting open-source software, since open source has long been included in its proprietary offerings, a trend that is increasing. (Duffner knows this, of course - he has a deep background in open source. I suspect his comment was designed to placate internal Microsoft factions more than to convey any information to customers.)

Not that customers are fooled. Forrester Research recently surveyed a range of enterprises and uncovered an overwhelming understanding among IT buyers that proprietary offerings have open source inside. So, to Duffner's point, Microsoft and open-source software already are part of the same buying decision, both in terms of separate products and in terms of Microsoft's own products.

Kudos to Duffer, Sam Ramji, and others on the Microsoft open-source team that are preaching this open-source gospel to the Microsofties. It seems to be sinking in.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from The Open Road
What soccer team would your company be?
Open-source licensing: Your mileage may vary
Open source to shape cloud computing, but not dominate it
Off-topic: Why can't I have this job?
Legalized drugs, now open source. Those crazy Dutch!
Will 'good enough' virtualization topple VMware?
Linux community codes around Microsoft's FAT patents
As Mozilla 'upgrades the Web,' Microsoft must upgrade its pace
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by applediddy December 10, 2008 7:34 AM PST
"Microsoft already is promoting open-source software, since open source has long been included in its proprietary offerings"

I'm confused, what software that Microsoft offers is even remotely based on open source?
Reply to this comment
by JadedGamer December 14, 2008 8:54 AM PST
Lots of BSD code in Windows, especially the TCP/IP tools like ftp and ping.
by Goodbye Helicopter December 10, 2008 8:01 AM PST
uh, let's see...
anything that uses C or C++, the internet, email, networking, large amounts of graphics and file routines

you really don't have a clue how much open source software is all around us, but with different packaging on top
Reply to this comment
by MSSlayer December 10, 2008 8:06 AM PST
berkley sockets API is another, except for one small change that makes them incompatible.
by den_harsh December 10, 2008 4:05 PM PST
Good news. This will improve the quality in both private and open source software and reduce the price.. But I wounder, will we have open source windows?
Reply to this comment
by tomg36 December 11, 2008 6:17 AM PST
While it seems that Open Source and Microsoft don't belong in the same sentence, they actually do. I'm working for a company Aras Corp that released it's complete Product Life Cycle Management [PLM] product is under Microsoft Open Source licences. The Free Software Foundation classifies both licenses as "Free".

The client portion is released under the GPL compatible Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) (http://www.microsoft.com/opensource/licenses.mspx), and the server code is released under Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL) . Microsoft has a web site www.codeplex.com that has almost 7000 projects and downloads.


Tom
www.aras.com
Reply to this comment
by Matt Asay December 11, 2008 1:45 PM PST
MSN Messenger, Visual Basic...just to name two that include open source code.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right