October 2, 2008 6:37 AM PDT

Palm needs Android? Do fish need water?

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments

Fortune makes the suggestion that Palm should focus on Google's Android mobile operating platform, and then ZDNet follows with a question, "Should Palm drop their Linux plans and embrace Android?"

The answer is "Yes." An emphatic "Yes."

Fortune writes:

...[I]t may be time for a drastic change of strategy. If Android is all it's cracked up to be, Palm may be better off scrapping its OS plans, and throwing in with Google instead....

Certainly, Palm would be taking a risk by betting on Android. Any embrace of Google would bring the wrath of Microsoft, which could make it more difficult for Palm to produce its most profitable handsets, its Windows Mobile-based Treos.

It really doesn't matter if Android is "all it's cracked up to be." It also doesn't matter if Microsoft doesn't like it. Palm isn't exactly thriving with Microsoft's Windows Mobile platform (nor is Microsoft, for that matter). Palm is a walking corpse and needs to associate with living, breathing human beings again.

Android lets Palm bet big on the future. Windows Mobile is a bet on an operating system that has failed to make much of a dent on the market in its 10 years of struggling to do so. Palm was right to bet on Linux two years ago, but it has done little with the strategy. It's time to try its luck with Google. Android is no panacea, but it's better than popping Advil while its arms, legs, and neck get amputated by the market.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
Canonical shines its Ubuntu light on consumers
Open source became big business in 2009
Will we see an open-source IPO in 2010?
Could Apache keep Google's regulators at bay?
Red Hat's Q3 earnings defy gravity
Canonical's opportunity to simplify Ubuntu
Google--not necessarily 'more open than thou'
Is it Ballmer's fault?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by kboateng October 2, 2008 9:31 AM PDT
It wouldn't hurt Palm to try Android but Windows was the best move they ever made. PERIOD.
Reply to this comment
by c|net Reader October 2, 2008 2:20 PM PDT
It was not the best move. They would have fared much better to deliver what their best customers wanted: advanced PDAs. Smartphones are horrible PDAs. There are folks who want a fair PDA and a decent phone in one device. There are folks who are quite happy to have a terrific PDA and the phone of their choice in separate devices. Competing with the likes of Motorola, LG, Samsung, etc. in making phones was silly. OK, creating the first converged device was smart, but they should have sold the technology to one of the big companies and focused on what they had always been good at.

What you have today is a company that abandoned its roots to grow only to find that it couldn't compete with the big dogs and is now smaller and weaker than ever. How is that smart?
by jrepenning October 2, 2008 10:30 AM PDT
Why is Android more 'living, breathing" than Linux?
Reply to this comment
by c|net Reader October 2, 2008 2:21 PM PDT
It is more alive than Palm's Linux efforts.
by Zaunto October 2, 2008 5:15 PM PDT
Maybe the article writer hasn't noticed this, but Palm has made more money from their Windows mobile Treos than the Palm versions. The Palm OS hasn't been updated since 2003. Palm's Linux strategy is nothing more than Vaporware. They should just license Android, retire the tired and aging Palm OS, and continue to sell Windows Mobile Smart Phones as well. Palm isn't going anywhere any time soon.
Reply to this comment
by Squichie October 3, 2008 1:38 AM PDT
@jrepenning

I think he means that their distro of Linux is no where near that of google's. Personally, I have never liked windows mobile, yet I know that the market has not been super competitive. I look forward to android, and I think it can do more than windows would ever be able to do, and I think it will be the Iphone alternative. Offering a beautiful product like apple, but a different philosophy, which is opensource.
by ChrisLang October 3, 2008 6:42 PM PDT
I use a Windows phone because it integrates with Outlook easily. Enough said.

What most have missed with Andoid is that it is going to integrate with the Google social network.

Also the browser runs JavaScript AND flash, something no other browser does well.

True OperaMini does run JavaScript, however it throws a out of memory error soon after and on every page you try to load from there on. But no flash.

So, have you seen Friend Connect soon on Blogger and in testing on 8 beta sites? Gee, the Anfroid browser runs JavaScript and not just JavaScript but AJAX, what Friend Connect needs to run on blogs.

Then, gee, what extremely popular site uses flash video, is social with friends lists? Do you see a pattern here? The android phone is going to give you Gtalk, a list of friends, not just contacts, BUT Internet friends that are on line. Wait till they add Geo Locating to the Android list and you can tell where your friends are at and go where they are. Think clubs. Think happy hour. Think events.

Does this make sense? Everything Google is doing right now is all part of this evil plan to take over the social network scene and has been for years. Why do you think they did not buy Digg?

Bottom line: I miss my Treo 650, do you remember no more than two clicks away? I do.

Chris Lang
http://www.keywebdata.com
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right